Ha Young Yoon1, Nari Lee1, Jong-Mi Seong1, Hye Sun Gwak1. 1. College of Pharmacy and Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
AIM: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel with those of clopidogrel in CYP2C19 reduced-metabolizers. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials or cohort studies up to January 2020. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular (CV) death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis and stroke. The secondary endpoint was bleeding. Pooled effects were measured by relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's regression test and adjusted by trim and fill method. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising 5829 CV patients with CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles were included. Patients who received ticagrelor or prasugrel showed a lower risk of MACE than those who received clopidogrel (RR 0.524; 95% CI: 0.375, 0.731). The former also had lower risks of CV death (RR 0.409; 95% CI: 0.177, 0.946), all-cause death (RR 0.441; 95% CI: 0.263, 0.739), MI (RR 0.554; 95% CI: 0.414, 0.741) and stent thrombosis (RR 0.587; 95% CI: 0.348, 0.988) than the latter patient group. The risk of stroke was not significantly different between patients receiving the alternatives and those receiving clopidogrel (RR 0.605; 95% CI: 0.257, 1.425). Major and minor bleeding risk was not significantly different between patients treated with alternatives and clopidogrel (RR 1.019; 95% CI: 0.827, 1.260 and RR 1.235; 95% CI: 0.581, 2.628, respectively). CONCLUSION: CYP2C19 reduced-metabolizers can expect better clinical outcome on using prasugrel or ticagrelor rather than clopidogrel.
AIM: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel with those of clopidogrel in CYP2C19 reduced-metabolizers. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials or cohort studies up to January 2020. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular (CV) death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis and stroke. The secondary endpoint was bleeding. Pooled effects were measured by relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's regression test and adjusted by trim and fill method. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising 5829 CV patients with CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles were included. Patients who received ticagrelor or prasugrel showed a lower risk of MACE than those who received clopidogrel (RR 0.524; 95% CI: 0.375, 0.731). The former also had lower risks of CV death (RR 0.409; 95% CI: 0.177, 0.946), all-cause death (RR 0.441; 95% CI: 0.263, 0.739), MI (RR 0.554; 95% CI: 0.414, 0.741) and stent thrombosis (RR 0.587; 95% CI: 0.348, 0.988) than the latter patient group. The risk of stroke was not significantly different between patients receiving the alternatives and those receiving clopidogrel (RR 0.605; 95% CI: 0.257, 1.425). Major and minor bleeding risk was not significantly different between patients treated with alternatives and clopidogrel (RR 1.019; 95% CI: 0.827, 1.260 and RR 1.235; 95% CI: 0.581, 2.628, respectively). CONCLUSION:CYP2C19 reduced-metabolizers can expect better clinical outcome on using prasugrel or ticagrelor rather than clopidogrel.
Authors: Jessica L Fayer Rehmel; James A Eckstein; Nagy A Farid; John B Heim; Steve C Kasper; Atsushi Kurihara; Steven A Wrighton; Barbara J Ring Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2006-01-13 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Richard C Becker; Jean Pierre Bassand; Andrzej Budaj; Daniel M Wojdyla; Stefan K James; Jan H Cornel; John French; Claes Held; Jay Horrow; Steen Husted; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Riitta Lassila; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Robert F Storey; Robert A Harrington; Lars Wallentin Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: P A Gurbel; T O Bergmeijer; U S Tantry; J M ten Berg; D J Angiolillo; S James; T L Lindahl; P Svensson; J A Jakubowski; P B Brown; S Duvvuru; S Sundseth; J R Walker; D Small; B A Moser; K J Winters; D Erlinge Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Larisa H Cavallari; Craig R Lee; Amber L Beitelshees; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Julio D Duarte; Deepak Voora; Stephen E Kimmel; Caitrin W McDonough; Yan Gong; Chintan V Dave; Victoria M Pratt; Tameka D Alestock; R David Anderson; Jorge Alsip; Amer K Ardati; Brigitta C Brott; Lawrence Brown; Supatat Chumnumwat; Michael J Clare-Salzler; James C Coons; Joshua C Denny; Chrisly Dillon; Amanda R Elsey; Issam S Hamadeh; Shuko Harada; William B Hillegass; Lindsay Hines; Richard B Horenstein; Lucius A Howell; Linda J B Jeng; Mark D Kelemen; Yee Ming Lee; Oyunbileg Magvanjav; May Montasser; David R Nelson; Edith A Nutescu; Devon C Nwaba; Ruth E Pakyz; Kathleen Palmer; Josh F Peterson; Toni I Pollin; Alison H Quinn; Shawn W Robinson; Jamie Schub; Todd C Skaar; D Max Smith; Vindhya B Sriramoju; Petr Starostik; Tomasz P Stys; James M Stevenson; Nicholas Varunok; Mark R Vesely; Dyson T Wake; Karen E Weck; Kristin W Weitzel; Russell A Wilke; James Willig; Richard Y Zhao; Rolf P Kreutz; George A Stouffer; Philip E Empey; Nita A Limdi; Alan R Shuldiner; Almut G Winterstein; Julie A Johnson Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Luke C Pilling; Deniz Türkmen; Hannah Fullalove; Janice L Atkins; Joao Delgado; Chia-Ling Kuo; George A Kuchel; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack Bowden; Jane A H Masoli; David Melzer Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Shangqing Jiang; Patrick C Mathias; Nathaniel Hendrix; Brian H Shirts; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; David Veenstra; Daniel Malone; Beth Devine Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 3.245
Authors: Mohammed Ahmed Akkaif; Mei Li Ng; Muhamad Ali Sk Abdul Kader; Nur Aizati Athirah Daud; Abubakar Sha'aban; Baharudin Ibrahim Journal: Pharmacol Rep Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 3.024