Literature DB >> 32319699

NTRK testing: First results of the QuiP-EQA scheme and a comprehensive map of NTRK fusion variants and their diagnostic coverage by targeted RNA-based NGS assays.

Martina Kirchner1, Julia Glade1, Ulrich Lehmann2, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse3, Michael Hummel4, Annika Lehmann4, Marcel Trautmann5, Jörg Kumbrink6, Andreas Jung6, Wolfgang Dietmaier7, Volker Endris1, Daniel Kazdal1, Carolin Ploeger1, Matthias Evert7, David Horst4, Hans Kreipe2, Thomas Kirchner6, Eva Wardelmann5, Reinhard Büttner3, Wilko Weichert8, Manfred Dietel4,9, Peter Schirmacher1, Albrecht Stenzinger1, Nicole Pfarr8.   

Abstract

Gene fusions involving the three neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase genes NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3 were identified as oncogenic drivers in many cancer types. Two small molecule inhibitors have been tested in clinical trials recently and require the detection of a NTRK fusion gene prior to therapeutic application. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) assays are commonly used for diagnostic profiling of gene fusions. In the presented study we applied an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme in order to investigate the suitability of FISH and RNA-/DNA-based tNGS for detection of NTRK fusions in a multinational and multicentric ring trial. In total 27 participants registered for this study. Nine institutions took part in the FISH-based and 18 in the NGS-based round robin test, the latter additionally subdivided into low-input and high-input NGS methods (regarding nucleic acid input). Regardless of the testing method applied, all participants received tumor sections of 10 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks for in situ hybridization or RNA/DNA extraction, and the results were submitted via an online questionnaire. For FISH testing, eight of nine (88.8%) participants, and for NGS-based testing 15 of 18 (83.3%) participants accomplished the round robin test successfully. The overall high success rate demonstrates that FISH- and tNGS-based NTRK testing can be well established in a routine diagnostic setting. Complementing this dataset, we provide an updated in silico analysis on the coverage of more than 150 NTRK fusion variants by several commercially available RNA-based tNGS panels.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FISH; NGS; NTRK; NTRK fusion variants; RNA sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32319699     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  10 in total

Review 1.  [New in the current WHO classification (2020) for soft tissue sarcomas].

Authors:  Eva Wardelmann; Wolfgang Hartmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Routine Molecular Pathology Diagnostics in Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Carina Wenzel; Sylvia Herold; Martin Wermke; Daniela E Aust; Gustavo B Baretton
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Next-Generation Sequencing with Liquid Biopsies from Treatment-Naïve Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Paul Hofman
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  [Diagnosis and therapy of tumors with NTRK gene fusion].

Authors:  Albrecht Stenzinger; Cornelis M van Tilburg; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Florian Länger; Norbert Graf; Frank Griesinger; Lukas C Heukamp; Michael Hummel; Thomas Klingebiel; Simone Hettmer; Christian Vokuhl; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse; Friedrich Overkamp; Peter Reichardt; Monika Scheer; Wilko Weichert; C Benedikt Westphalen; Carsten Bokemeyer; Philipp Ivanyi; Sonja Loges; Peter Schirmacher; Bernhard Wörmann; Stefan Bielack; Thomas T W Seufferlein
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 5.  NTRK insights: best practices for pathologists.

Authors:  Jaclyn F Hechtman
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Toward in vivo proof of binding of 18F-labeled inhibitor [18F]TRACK to peripheral tropomyosin receptor kinases.

Authors:  Melinda Wuest; Justin J Bailey; Jennifer Dufour; Darryl Glubrecht; Vanessa Omana; Tom H Johnston; Jonathan M Brotchie; Ralf Schirrmacher
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 7.  The Significance of External Quality Assessment Schemes for Molecular Testing in Clinical Laboratories.

Authors:  Nele Laudus; Lynn Nijs; Inne Nauwelaers; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Genomic architecture of FGFR2 fusions in cholangiocarcinoma and its implication for molecular testing.

Authors:  Olaf Neumann; Timothy C Burn; Michael Allgäuer; Markus Ball; Martina Kirchner; Thomas Albrecht; Anna-Lena Volckmar; Susanne Beck; Volker Endris; Hannah Goldschmid; Ulrich Lehmann; Huriye Seker-Cin; Sebastian Uhrig; Stephanie Roessler; Jan Budczies; Stefan Fröhling; Thomas Longerich; Alex H Wagner; Arndt Vogel; Peter Schirmacher; Albrecht Stenzinger; Daniel Kazdal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 9.075

9.  Prevalence of NTRK Fusions in Canadian Solid Tumour Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ronald Carter; Harriet Feilotter; Timothy Feltis; Joshua D Silvertown; Connie Lisle; Laura Semenuk; Colleen Knapp; Jillann Jaynes; Doreen Berg; Nabodita Kaul; Josianne Lachapelle; Leslie Richardson; Marsha Speevak; Haya Sarras; David M Berman
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.476

10.  Developing Drugs for Tissue-Agnostic Indications: A Paradigm Shift in Leveraging Cancer Biology for Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Nathan D Seligson; Todd C Knepper; Susanne Ragg; Christine M Walko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 6.875

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.