| Literature DB >> 32319138 |
Majid Mirzaee1,2, Shahryar Semnani1, GholamReza Roshandel1, Mojgan Nejabat3, Zahra Hesari4,5, Hamidreza Joshaghani4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been shown there is an upward trend for strontium (Sr) and antimony (Sb) levels from low-risk (LR) to high-risk (HR) areas of etiology of esophageal cancer in water, soil, and grains grown in Golestan province. In the present study, the serum levels of Sr and Sb were determined in healthy individuals living in these areas.Entities:
Keywords: antimony; esophageal cancer; high-risk areas; low-risk areas; strontium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32319138 PMCID: PMC7370749 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Lab Anal ISSN: 0887-8013 Impact factor: 2.352
Figure 1Strontium standard curve (The x‐axis and y‐axis represents the standard concentration and absorption, respectively)
GFAAS system parameters for measuring of strontium and antimony in serum
| Temp, °C | Ramp, s | Hold, s | Gas, mL/min (ON/OF) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step | ||||
| Dry1 (Sr) | 120 | 50 | 0 | 300 ON |
| Dry1 (Sb) | 70 | 45 | 0 | 300 ON |
| Dry2 (Sr) | 140 | 20 | 0 | 300 ON |
| Dry2 (Sb) | 120 | 10 | 0 | 300 ON |
| Dry3 (Sb) | 140 | 15 | 0 | 300 ON |
| Dry4 (Sb) | 400 | 30 | 0 | 300 ON |
| Ash1 (Sr) | 400 | 15 | 10 | 300 ON |
| Ash1 (Sb) | 1000 | 10 | 5 | 300 ON |
| Ash2 (Sr) | 400 | 0 | 3 | OF |
| Ash2 (Sb) | 1000 | 0 | 4 | OF |
| Atom (Sr) | 2700 | 0 | 3 | OF |
| Atom (Sb) | 2700 | 0 | 3 | OF |
| Clean (Sr) | 2800 | 0 | 3 | 300 ON |
| Clean (Sb) | 2700 | 0 | 3 | 300 ON |
| Cool (Sr) | 0 | 0 | 30 | 300 ON |
| Cool (Sb) | 0 | 0 | 30 | 300 ON |
| Conditions | ||||
| Purge Gas (Sr and Sb) | Argon | |||
| Mode (Sr and Sb) | Peak area | |||
| Injection volume (Sr and Sb) | 20 μL | |||
| Wavelength (Sr) | 460.7 nm | |||
| Wavelength (Sb) | 217.6 nm | |||
| Furnace (Sr and Sb) | Pyrolytically coated graphite tube | |||
| Accuracy and precision | ||||
| Recovery (Sr) | 97% | |||
| Recovery (Sb) | 93% | |||
| Coefficient of variation (Sr) | 6% | |||
| Coefficient of variation (Sb) | 8% | |||
| Standard deviation (Sr) | 1.82 | |||
| Standard deviation (Sb) | 0.94 | |||
| Limit of detection (Sr) | 0.013 | |||
| Limit of detection (Sb) | 0.001 | |||
Abbreviations: GFAAS, Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy; Sb, antimony; Sr, strontium.
Figure 2Antimony standard curve (The x‐axis and y‐axis represents the standard concentration and absorption, respectively)
Data analysis of strontium and antimony (μg/L)
| Data analysis of strontium (μg/L) | Data analysis of antimony (μg/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | Area | |||||
| West (LR) | East (HR) |
| West (LR) | East (HR) |
| |
| WP | 30.44 ± 4.05 (104/52%) | 30.29 ± 3.74 (96/48%) | .42 | 15.21 ± 3.40 (104/52%) | 14.81 ± 3.17 (96/48%) | .42 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD (number of participants/percent of participants).
Abbreviations: HR, high‐risk areas; LR, low‐risk areas; WP, Whole of province.