In the normal physiology of the bladder wall, it has sufficient elasticity so that it can maintain normal pressure during filling phase of bladder.[1] Bladder functional pathology, secondary to neurogenic bladder or bladder outlet obstruction, can disturbs this elasticity by disturbing detrusor smooth muscle.[23] The prevalence of these defects is about 40% of children's urological referrals. The golden diagnostic standard of these functional pathologies is urodynamic study. Urodynamic study used diagnostic techniques that examine the function of the lower urinary system (composed of the bladder and urethra).[45] This study estimates the pressure flow relationship between the bladder and urethra, and the ultimate aim of this study is to adapt the symptoms of the patient to the pathophysiology of the bladder urethra which results in a final diagnosis.[6] These studies should evaluate the filling, capacity, and voiding phases of the bladder and urethra.[78] The problems of performing an urodynamic test such as the need for invasive catheterization, time and cost, patient collaboration, and the obstructive effect of the catheter (especially in patients with prostate enlargement and urethral stenosis), which may make diagnostic difficult; a series of these issues led to low aggressive and simpler tests to prioritize.[59]Researches today show a proven relationship between the rate of tissue damage and the impairment of the urodynamic evaluation, in other words, factors such as capacity, compliance, and bladder pressure have a proven relationship with the structural diseases of the organ.[10] At present, the above-mentioned urodynamic tests are considered as the gold standard for the diagnosis of bladder function.[1112] Research is now being made of the advancement of imaging techniques in order to eliminate and reduce as much as possible aggressive tests.[13] One of these new findings is Shear wave elastography. Elasticity testing is one of the latest technological advances in ultrasound that measures elastic and tissue consistency especially in soft tissues.[1415] Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the shear wave ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of neurogenic bladder.
Objectives
Aim of this assessment is specificity evaluation of ultrasound elastography for detection of neurogenic bladder in comparison with urodynamic study.
Patients and Methods
Study setting
It was a hospital-based study which conducted on patient with clinical manifestations of neurogenic bladder in Golestan Hospital of Ahvaz.
Study population
Study populations were all patients with clinical manifestations of neurogenic bladder. Based on this, 30 patients with these conditions, considered as study group.
Measurements
In this study, data on urodynamic study and bladder shear wave elastography results of patients who have been referred to the Center for urodynamic evaluation of Golestan Hospital in Ahwaz for various reasons during the years 1396 and 1397 have been studied over a specified period. In this study, patients who were referred for urodynamic study were first performed by a urologist on their urodynamic tests, then bladder shear wave elastography was done by radiologist. Patients were included in our study were suspected of neurogenic bladder based on history (frequency, urgency,) or ultrasound and VCUG finding (increased bladder wall thickness, bilateral hydronephrosis and bladder capacity reduction in relation to age). Data such as age, gender, height, weight, and other demographic data of patients were also evaluated. Patients were informed about the response to side effects before the urodynamic and Shear wave sonography tests, and in case of dissatisfaction, the patients were excluded from the study.At first, the urodynamic test was performed by the urologist and then the Shear wave ultrasonography was performed by a radiologist using a Supersonic device. Then all the information derived from the Shear wave ultrasound was compared with the results of the urodynamic study. The shear velocity of bladder tissue from the anterior and posterior wall was also measured. This velocity was measured at different scales and in different bladder conditions (based on the volume of filled bladder volume).
Ethical considerations
The study group adheres to the principles of medical ethics introduced by the Health Ministry and the Declaration of Helsinki and legislation in medical ethics committee of Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences. In addition, ethical committee of Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences approved protocol of study. In addition, this test on patients does not have an effect on the patient's treatment process and the results of the assessment are only reported to the patient, also ethical issues completely observed by authors.
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed by SPSS program and P < 0.05 was considered as significant value. We consider T-test for quantitative variables and X2 test for qualitative variables.
Results
We evaluated 30 patients with clinical manifestations of neurogenic bladder as our study group, of these, in gender 19 cases (63.3%) were male and 11 cases (36.7%) were female, also mean and standard deviation of age were 15.7 ± 6.2 years. In addition BMI of patients in 3 patients were lower than normal, in 15 patients were normal, in 8 patients were overweight and in 4 patients were obesity [Table 1].
Table 1
Basic and Demographic Information in patients with Neurogenic Bladder
Variables
Amounts
Age (years)
Mean
15.7
Standard Deviation
6.2
Sex
Male
19 (63.3)
Female
11 (36.7)
BMI
Thin
3 (10)
Normal
15 (50)
Overweight
8 (26.6)
Obesity
4 (13.3)
Basic and Demographic Information in patients with Neurogenic BladderIn the evaluation of the urodynamic method, 27 of the 30 patients who had referred with clinical manifestations of neurogenic bladder, had significant diagnostic criteria for diagnosis of neurogenic bladder (compliance reduction or detrusor over activity, or both) [Table 2].
Table 2
Comparison results of ultrasound electrography
Variables
Shear Wave Velocity
P
n
SD±Mean
Anterior Wall
P<0.05
Positive
1.62±0.37
24 (80)
Negative
1.31±0.34
6 (20)
Posterior Wall
P<0.05
Positive
1.87±0.42
25 (83.3)
Negative
1.13±0.34
5 (16.7)
Comparison results of ultrasound electrographyWe have seen the characteristics of this test that the specificity of test for the diagnosis of neurogenic bladder was 83%(out of 24 patients in 27 cases as positive), and the positive predictive value of this test was 85 and its negative predictive value was to 87 which also indicates the diagnostic ability of this test and this is statistically significant in patients (P < 0.05). We also observed the posture of the posterior wall, which has been shown to be a diagnostic test of neurogenic bladder (85%) (Out of 25 patients in 27 cases as positive), which indicates a high diagnostic capability of this test, as well as the positive predictive value of this test was 88and its negative predictive value was 90 that was statistically significant in patients (P < 0.05) [Table 2].In addition, mean and standard deviation of shear wave speed in patients with normal bladder were 1.11 ± 0.31 and in the group with abnormal bladder compliance was 1.65 ± 0.42, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.02). Detrusor over activity was also associated with shear wave speed in the bladder wall, and this was statistically significant (P = 0.008) [Table 3].
Table 3
Investigation of the relationship between different indices with the shear wave velocity of the bladder wall
Variables
Shear Wave Velocity
P
SD±Mean
Compliance
P=0.02
Normal
1.11±0.31
Decreased
1.65±0.42
Detrusor Over activity
P=0.008
Positive
1.69±0.26
Negative
1.07±0.45
Age (Years)
P=0.42
Less than 10
1.46±0.32
15-10
1.48±0.31
over 15
1.50±0.33
Gender
P=0.08
Male
1.46±0.33
female
1.50±0.31
BMI
P=0.7
Thin
1.48±0.33
Normal
1.47±0.30
Overweight
1.49±0.31
Obesity
1.45±0.34
Investigation of the relationship between different indices with the shear wave velocity of the bladder wall
Discussion
We found that the ultrasound elastography has a high specificity for neurogenic bladder detection in comparison with urodynamic study; however, other studies have shown different results in this regard. In following other study that conducted for this diagnostic method has been discussed. In addition, about primary care of patients in this field we observed that, in other studies also in recent study patients can be better evaluated and primary diagnosis of patients as an alternative diagnostic method and a primary screening method. So, this method can be used for diagnosis of urodynamic condition of bladder in primary care of patients and lead to better care of patients in this level.Sturm et al. reported that there was a significant difference between the shear wave speed (SWS) of the compliance and the noncompliance bladder.[16] On the other hand, Sebag et al. also evaluated the value of the shear wave elastography method for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules, and after statistical evaluations, they stated that ultimately 15 patients with thyroid malignancy were identified which had distinctly different findings in shear wave elastography,[17] these results are consistent with the observations from our assessment and indicate the importance of this method. On the other hand, Naqviet al. in a study that evaluated the shear wave elastography technique in liver fibrosis patients, have reported that this is a relatively new method of staging and grading liver fibrosis after statistical evaluations,[18] based on this, this method be founded as an effective method in liver evaluation. Accordingly, most studies in this field have been consistent with the results of our assessment, which indicates that this method is a less invasive and appropriate method for detection of neurogenic bladder.
Conclusion
Based on the results observed in this evaluation and, in comparison with other results in this field, bladder shear wave elastography has a high specificity for neurogenic bladder detection in comparison with urodynamic study. Accordingly, due to the less invasive nature of this method than urodynamic study, this can be used to identify patients with neurogenic bladder.
Authors: Ivan Z Nenadic; Bo Qiang; Matthew W Urban; Luiz Henrique de Araujo Vasconcelo; Alireza Nabavizadeh; Azra Alizad; James F Greenleaf; Mostafa Fatemi Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: J Bamber; D Cosgrove; C F Dietrich; J Fromageau; J Bojunga; F Calliada; V Cantisani; J-M Correas; M D'Onofrio; E E Drakonaki; M Fink; M Friedrich-Rust; O H Gilja; R F Havre; C Jenssen; A S Klauser; R Ohlinger; A Saftoiu; F Schaefer; I Sporea; F Piscaglia Journal: Ultraschall Med Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 6.548
Authors: Andrew Evans; Patsy Whelehan; Kim Thomson; Denis McLean; Katrin Brauer; Colin Purdie; Lee Jordan; Lee Baker; Alastair Thompson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 6.466