| Literature DB >> 32318267 |
Angelo Tremblay1, Marie-Pier Bélanger1, Rupinder Dhaliwal2, Paula Brauer3, Dawna Royall3, David M Mutch4, Caroline Rhéaume5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a health disorder characterized by metabolic abnormalities that predict an increased risk to develop cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). It can be resolved, and its complications reduced, by lifestyle interventions offered in primary care. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of the exercise program of the CHANGE feasibility study on physical fitness and physical activity habits, and assess associations between changes in MetS components and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF).Entities:
Keywords: Blood pressure; Exercise; Lifestyle; Plasma glucose; VO2max; Waist circumference
Year: 2020 PMID: 32318267 PMCID: PMC7158158 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-020-0399-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Public Health ISSN: 0778-7367
Baseline patient characteristics
| All patients ( | Men ( | Women ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 59.84 ± 0.66 | 58.96 ± 0.94 | 60.75 ± 0.91 | 0.1730 |
| Current smoker (n (%)) | 15 (7.81) | 6 (6.19) | 9 (9.47) | 0.3996 |
| Height (meters) | 1. 69 ± 0.01 | 1.75 ± 0.01 | 1.62 ± 0.01 | < 0.0001 |
| Weight (kg) | 88.60 ± 1.03 | 94.84 ± 1.24 | 82.22 ± 1.38 | < 0.0001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 106.29 ± 0.66 | 107.99 ± 0.84 | 104.54 ± 0.99 | 0.0085 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 31.04 ± 0.25 | 30.79 ± 0.34 | 31.29 ± 0.38 | 0.3223 |
| VO2max (ml.kg-1.min− 1) | 32.81 ± 0.50 | 38.06 ± 0.52 | 27.46 ± 0.39 | < 0.0001 |
Data are mean ± standard error (SE) or n (%). BMI Body Mass Index
Note: P values based on t test/ANOVA for all variables
Personalized targets and measured values of aerobic exercise duration and intensity for study participants
| Time | Aerobic exercise | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration (min) | Intensity (bpm) | ||||||||
| Targeted | Measured | Targeted | Measured | ||||||
| Men | Week 1 | 84 | 25.73 ± 0.52a | 84 | 26.12 ± 0.54a | 83 | 111.28 ± 1.99a | 83 | 117.58 ± 1.78a |
| Week 11 | 72 | 34.28 ± 0.87b | 72 | 34.46 ± 0.90b | 71 | 119.37 ± 2.45b | 72 | 126.76 ± 2.47b | |
| Month 11 | 65 | 33.85 ± 0.97b | 65 | 32.69 ± 1.07b | 65 | 117.38 ± 2.42b | 65 | 125.74 ± 2.45b | |
| < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | ||||||
| Women | Week 1 | 84 | 25.65 ± 0.62a | 83 | 26.2 ± 0.64a | 84 | 110.11 ± 1.85a | 82 | 115.34 ± 1.82a |
| Week 11 | 66 | 33.23 ± 0.95b | 66 | 33.41 ± 0.98b | 66 | 116.00 ± 2.25b | 66 | 120.47 ± 2.19b | |
| Month 11 | 78 | 32.73 ± 0.85b | 78 | 31.99 ± 0.96b | 78 | 114.53 ± 1.92b | 78 | 122.60 ± 2.05b | |
| < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0004 | ||||||
Values are mean ± standard error (SE)
† P values based on linear mixed model analysis within each group (men and women). Values within each column with different superscript letter (a, b) are significantly different (p < 0.05)
As explained in the results section, exercise duration and intensity were measured at weeks 1 and 11 and month 11 to represent changes over time (instead of months 0, 3 and 12) to minimize missing values
Aerobic fitness, muscular and flexibility characteristics for study subjects
| Men ( | Women ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Month 3 | Month 12 | Baseline | Month 3 | Month 12 | |||
| Speed (mph) | 3.2 ± 0.1a | 3.6 ± 0.1b | 3.7 ± 0.1 b | < 0.0001 | 2.5 ± 0.1a | 3.0 ± 0.1b | 3.2 ± 0.1c | < 0.0001 |
| Steady-state heart rate (bpm) | 120 ± 2 | 119 ± 2 | 122 ± 2 | 0.1635 | 123 ± 2 a | 119 ± 2 b | 122 ± 2a | 0.0004 |
| VO2max (ml.kg-1.min−1) | 38.1 ± 0.6 a | 40.5 ± 0.6 b | 40.4 ± 0.6 b | < 0.0001 | 27.5 ± 0.4 a | 30.1 ± 0.4 b | 30.8 ± 0.4 b | < 0.0001 |
| Aerobic fitness score (unit) | 381.5 ± 5.5a | 404.8 ± 0.6 b | 403.8 ± 5.5 b | < 0.0001 | 274.6 ± 4.6 a | 301.3 ± 4.6 b | 308.4 ± 4.6 b | < 0.0001 |
| Health benefit zone - (aerobics) (0 to 4)§ | 2.0 ± 0.1a | 1.6 ± 0.1 b | 1.6 ± 0.1 b | < 0.0001 | 3.8 ± 0.1 a | 3.3 ± 0.1 b | 3.1 ± 0.1 b | < 0.0001 |
| Partial curl-ups (repetition 0 to 25) | 11 ± 1 a | 16 ± 1 b | 17 ± 1 b | < 0.0001 | 5 ± 1 a | 8 ± 1 b | 9 ± 1 b | < 0.0001 |
| Health benefit zone - (Partial curl-ups) (0 to 4)§ | 3.5 ± 0.2 a | 2.6 ± 0.2 b | 2.4 ± 0.2 b | < 0.0001 | 4.1 ± 0.2 a | 3.7 ± 0.2 b | 3.4 ± 0.2 b | < 0.0001 |
| Push-ups (repetition) | 8 ± 1 a | 11 ± 1 b | 12 ± 1 b | < 0.0001 | 4 ± 1 a | 7 ± 1 b | 8 ± 1 b | < 0.0001 |
| Health benefit zone - (Push-ups) (0 to 4)§ | 3.8 ± 0.12 a | 3.3 ± 0.2 b | 3.1 ± 0.2 b | < 0.0001 | 4.0 ± 0.1 a | 3.6 ± 0.1 b | 3.4 ± 0.1 b | < 0.0001 |
| Flexibility (cm) | 16.5 ± 1.0 a | 19.0 ± 1.0 b | 20.2 ± 1.0c | < 0.0001 | 23.0 ± 1.0 a | 24.9 ± 1.0 b | 25.3 ± 1.0 b | 0.0003 |
| Health benefit zone - (Flexibility) (0 to 4)§ | 4.0 ± 0.1 a | 3.7 ± 0.1 b | 3.5 ± 0.1 b | < 0.0001 | 3.9 ± 0.2 a | 3.5 ± 0.2 b | 3.5 ± 0.2 b | < 0.0001 |
Data are mean ± standard error (SE). § A lower score indicates a better performance. † P values obtained by comparing differences in the variable values within each group (men, woment) by using a linear mixed model analysis
Variations of VO2 max overtime in subjects classified according to tertiles of baseline VO2
| VO2 max (ml.kg-1.min−1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All subjects | Low ( | Medium ( | High ( | ||
| Men ( | Baseline | 38.1 ± 0.5a | 32.7 ± 0.3a | 37.8 ± 0.2a | 43.9 ± 0.6a |
| 3 months | 40.5 ± 0.6b | 34.6 ± 0.3b | 40.2 ± 0.3b | 46.7 ± 0.7b | |
| 12 months | 40.4 ± 0.6b | 34.5 ± 0.4b | 40.2 ± 0.3b | 46.4 ± 0.6b | |
| ( | ( | ( | |||
| Women ( | Baseline | 27.5 ± 0.4a | 23.4 ± 0.3a | 27.1 ± 0.2a | 31.7 ± 0.4a |
| 3 months | 30.1 ± 0.4b | 25.7 ± 0.4b | 30.2 ± 0.2b | 34.4 ± 0.3b | |
| 12 months | 30.9 ± 0.4b | 26.5 ± 0.3b | 30.7 ± 0.2b | 35.1 ± 0.3b | |
Data are mean ± standard error (SE)
A two-way ANOVA with repeated measures revealed a significant effect of VO2 max tertiles (P < 0.0001) and of time (P < 0.0001) for each group (men and women). There were no significant time* tertiles interaction effect for men and women. Values within the same column and same gender with different superscript letters (a,b) are significantly diffirent (P < 0.0001)
Components of MetS for study subjects
| Variables | Baseline | Month 3 | Month 12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men ( | ||||
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 82.3 ± 0.8 | 78.1 ± 0.8 | 78.1 ± 0.8 | < 0.0001 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 135.1 ± 1.3 | 126.7 ± 1.3 | 129.6 ± 1.3 | < 0.0001 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 6.43 ± 0.12 | 6.19 ± 0.12 | 6.39 ± 0.12 | 0.0352 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.08 ± 0.02 | 1.09 ± 0.02 | 1.13 ± 0.02 | 0.0011 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 2.47 ± 0.18 | 1.79 ± 0.19 | 1.86 ± 0.19 | < 0.0001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 108.0 ± 0.9 | 105.3 ± 0.9 | 104.1 ± 0.9 | < 0.0001 |
| Women ( | ||||
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 79.0 ± 0.9 | 75.6 ± 0.9 | 76.3 ± 0.9 | 0.0004 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 134.0 ± 1.5 | 126.3 ± 1.5 | 129.1 ± 1.5 | < 0.0001 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 6.39 ± 0.14 | 6.25 ± 0.14 | 6.33 ± 0.14 | 0.4129 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.31 ± 0.03 | 1.29 ± 0.03 | 1.38 ± 0.03 | < 0.0001 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 2.01 ± 0.09 | 1.83 ± 0.09 | 1.84 ± 0.09 | 0.0184 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 104.5 ± 1.0 | 101.8 ± 1.0 | 99.9 ± 1.0 | < 0.0001 |
Data are mean ± standard error
* p values obtained by comparing differences in the variable value within each group (men, women) by using a linear mixed model analysis
Fig. 1Mean changes in waist circumference (WC) between baseline and month 12 (Panel a) and mean changes in waist circumference (WC) between month 3 and month 12 (Panel b) for women according to changes in VO2 max tertiles. Panel A: ∆VO2max values were 0.24 (0.24), 2.80 (0.11), and 7.24 (0.56) (Mean ± SE) ml.kg-1.min− 1 for the low, medium and high tertiles, respectively. Panel B: Corresponding ∆VO2max values were − 1.48 (0.33), 0.54 (0.06), and 3.13 (0.35). Values within the same panel with different superscript letters (a,b) are significantly different (P < 0.05, Tukey-Kramer post hoc)
Fig. 2Activity participation classified in two categories of intensity for men (Panel a) and women (Panel b) in Laval University participants. Lower intensity: sum of leisure activities and sports and manual work at moderate intensity; Higher intensity: sum of leisure and sports activities of higher intensity and intense manual work, high intensity sport activities or sport competition. Values within the same line and same gender with different superscript letters (a,b) are significantly different (P < 0.01, Tukey-Kramer post hoc)