| Literature DB >> 32317855 |
Kaviarasu Munian1, Shahfiz Mohammad Azman1, Norhazwani Ahmad Ruzman1, Noor Faradiana Md Fauzi1, Alwani Nur Zakaria1.
Abstract
Volant and non-volant small mammals from three forest reserves, located inside and outside Selangor State Park, Malaysia, were trapped and documented. A total of five-line transects, each 200 m long and a total of 100 collapsible cage traps, three harp traps and ten mist nets were deployed at each study site to capture rodents and bats species. The presence of 47 species of volant and non-volant mammals was documented with the highest abundant species being Leopoldamys sabanus (n = 61). The Family Vespertilionidae was the most diverse, while Muridae was the most abundant species. Diversity indices have shown forest reserves - Gading Forest Reserve (FR) and Bukit Kutu FR - located in the State Park, have a higher species composition than the impaired adjacent forest reserve, Bukit Tarek FR extension. The taxonomic diversity and taxonomic distinctness of the three forest reserves ranged between 2.433 and 2.610, while the taxonomic distinctness values ranged between 2.638 and 2.748. Even though Gading FR recorded the highest number of species diversity, the Chao 1 diversity estimator and the rarefaction accumulation curve indicated that Bukit Kutu comprised more species. Comparisons between other state parks and national parks in Peninsular Malaysia indicated that Selangor State Park indeed harbours relatively more species of small mammals. Northern Selangor State Park and adjacent forest should be recognised as a conservation priority area, although there are comparatively more species harboured in other regions of the State Park. With the current information on fauna diversity, proper management should be formulated to preserve the existing ecosystems in order to ensure the continuity of fauna diversity in Malaysia. Kaviarasu Munian, Shahfiz Mohammad Azman, Norhazwani Ahmad Ruzman, Noor Faradiana Md. Fauzi, Alwani Nur Zakaria.Entities:
Keywords: Chiroptera ; Rodentia ; Bukit Kutu Forest Reserve; Bukit Tarek Forest Reserve (Extension); Diversity indices; Gading Forest Reserve; taxonomic distinctness; taxonomic diversity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32317855 PMCID: PMC7156494 DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e50304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biodivers Data J ISSN: 1314-2828
Figure 1.Location of Selangor state Park and present study sites. The black dots represent the location of present study sites.
Location and land cover composition of three study sites, based on information fromdata from the European Space Agency 2015 and reclassified, based on IPCC categories.
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Gading FR |
|
| 98.6 | 0.7 | 0.68 |
| Bukit Tarek FR (E) |
|
| 55.82 | 0.0 | 44.18 |
| Bukit Kutu FR |
|
| 99.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
List of species and abundance of small mammal assemblage in three study sites.
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |||||
| 1 | Non-volant |
|
| 1 | |||
| 2 |
|
| 7 | 8 | 5 | ||
| 3 |
| 1 | 2 | ||||
| 4 |
| 3 | 23 | 13 | |||
| 5 |
| 17 | 34 | 10 | |||
| 6 |
| 6 | 5 | 4 | |||
| 7 |
| 3 | |||||
| 8 |
| 5 | 12 | ||||
| 9 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||
| 10 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||
| 11 |
|
| 7 | 11 | |||
| 12 |
| 1 | |||||
| 13 |
| 1 | |||||
| 14 |
|
| 2 | ||||
| 15 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||
| 16 |
|
| 1 | 4 | 2 | ||
| 17 | Volant |
|
| 1 | 23 | 2 | |
| 18 |
| 1 | 3 | 5 | |||
| 19 |
| 7 | 17 | ||||
| 20 |
| 1 | 6 | 3 | |||
| 21 |
| 2 | |||||
| 22 |
| 1 | |||||
| 23 |
|
| 1 | ||||
| 24 |
|
| 7 | 1 | 14 | ||
| 25 |
| 15 | 1 | 13 | |||
| 26 |
| 8 | 2 | ||||
| 27 |
| 2 | |||||
| 28 |
| 2 | |||||
| 29 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
| 30 |
|
| 6 | 12 | 4 | ||
| 31 |
| 1 | 25 | 10 | |||
| 32 |
| 1 | |||||
| 33 |
| 4 | |||||
| 34 |
| 1 | |||||
| 35 |
| 1 | |||||
| 36 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
| 37 |
| 1 | 3 | ||||
| 38 |
| 1 | |||||
| 39 |
| 1 | 4 | ||||
| 40 |
| 1 | |||||
| 41 |
| 2 | |||||
| 42 |
| 1 | |||||
| 43 |
| 1 | |||||
| 44 |
| 1 | |||||
| 45 |
| 1 | |||||
| 46 |
| 1 | |||||
| 47 |
| 3 | |||||
|
| 92 | 199 | 142 | ||||
A compilation of small mammals in Selangor State Park, based on three regions: a:present study and Lim et al. 1999; b:Nor et al. 2001and Sing et al. 2013; c:Lim et al. 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
| 1 | Non-volant |
|
| / | / | |
| 2 |
| / | ||||
| 3 |
|
| / | |||
| 4 |
| / | ||||
| 5 |
| / | / | |||
| 6 |
| / | ||||
| 7 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 8 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 9 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 10 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 11 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 12 |
| / | ||||
| 13 |
| / | ||||
| 14 |
| / | / | |||
| 15 |
| / | / | |||
| 16 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 17 |
|
| / | / | / | |
| 18 |
| / | / | |||
| 19 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 20 |
| / | ||||
| 21 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 22 |
| / | ||||
| 23 |
| / | / | |||
| 24 |
| / | / | |||
| 25 |
| / | ||||
| 26 |
| / | / | |||
| 27 |
| / | / | |||
| 28 |
|
| / | |||
| 29 |
| / | ||||
| 30 |
| / | ||||
| 31 |
| / | / | |||
| 32 |
| / | / | |||
| 33 |
|
| / | / | ||
| 34 |
| / | ||||
| 35 |
| / | / | |||
| 36 |
|
| / | |||
| 37 |
| / | ||||
| 38 |
| / | ||||
| 39 |
| / | ||||
| 40 |
| / | ||||
| 41 |
| / | ||||
| 42 | Volant |
|
| / | / | / |
| 43 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 44 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 45 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 46 |
| / | / | |||
| 47 |
| / | ||||
| 48 |
| / | / | |||
| 49 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 50 |
| / | ||||
| 51 |
| / | ||||
| 52 |
| / | / | |||
| 53 |
|
| / | |||
| 54 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 55 |
|
| / | / | / | |
| 56 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 57 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 58 |
| / | / | |||
| 59 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 60 |
| / | / | |||
| 61 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 62 |
| / | / | |||
| 63 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 64 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 65 |
| / | / | |||
| 66 |
| / | / | |||
| 67 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 68 |
|
| / | / | ||
| 69 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 70 |
| / | ||||
| 71 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 72 |
| / | ||||
| 73 |
| / | / | |||
| 74 |
| / | ||||
| 75 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 76 |
| / | / | |||
| 77 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 78 |
| / | ||||
| 79 |
|
| / | / | / | |
| 80 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 81 |
| / | ||||
| 82 |
| / | ||||
| 83 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 84 |
| / | / | |||
| 85 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 86 |
| / | ||||
| 87 |
| / | ||||
| 88 |
| / | / | |||
| 89 |
| / | / | |||
| 90 |
| / | ||||
| 91 |
| / | ||||
| 92 |
| / | / | |||
| 93 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 94 |
| / | / | |||
| 95 |
| / | / | |||
| 96 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 97 |
| / | ||||
| 98 |
| / | ||||
| 99 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 100 |
| / | ||||
| 101 |
| / | ||||
| 102 |
| / | ||||
| 103 |
| / | ||||
| 104 |
| / | ||||
| 105 |
| / | ||||
| 106 |
|
| / | / | ||
| 107 |
| / | / | |||
| 108 |
| / | ||||
| 109 |
|
| / | / | ||
| 110 |
| / | / | / | ||
| 111 |
|
| / | / | ||
| 112 |
| |||||
| 113 | / | |||||
Figure 2.Small mammal accumulation curve, based on rarefaction for each study site in Northern Selangor State Park. Orange line: Gading FR; blue line: Bukit Kutu FR; pink line: Bukit Tarek (E) FR.
Species abundance, richness and diversity values estimated for each study locality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bukit Tarek (E) FR | 24 | 92 | 0.09405 | 2.69 | 0.6136 | 46 |
| Gading FR | 33 | 199 | 0.08644 | 2.828 | 0.5125 | 41.25 |
| Bukit Kutu FR | 28 | 142 | 0.06626 | 2.957 | 0.6873 | 30.5 |
Descriptive statistics of Taxonomic Diversity and Taxonomic Distinctness in three study sites.
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Gading FR | 2.610 | 2.572 | 2.643 | 2.803 | 2.743 | 2.789 |
| Bukit Tarek (T) FR | 2.433 | 2.522 | 2.682 | 2.638 | 2.708 | 2.818 |
| Bukit Kutu FR | 2.580 | 2.565 | 2.650 | 2.748 | 2.734 | 2.795 |
Figure 3.Dendrogram of species similarity between Selangor and other national and/or state parks in Peninsular Malaysia.