| Literature DB >> 32316680 |
Lisa Dicks1, Sabine Ellinger1.
Abstract
Cardiometabolic diseases are a leading global health challenge. Their incidence as well as progression is strongly affected by diet. Consumption of Pleurotus ostreatus (P. ostreatus), an edible oyster mushroom rich in functional ingredients (e.g., β-glucans), may improve glucose and lipid metabolism, blood pressure, body weight and appetite sensations. Hence, this systematic review aimed to provide an overview on the effects of P. ostreatus intake on cardiometabolic parameters from clinical trials, taking into account risk of bias (RoB). Relevant studies were investigated for details with consideration of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess the RoB. In total, eight trials included observed beneficial effects of P. ostreatus intake on glucose metabolism (reduction in fasting and/or 2 h postprandial glucose) and lipids (decrease in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and/or triglycerides), and some found a reduction in blood pressure. In contrast, body weight did not change. Appetite sensations were not assessed. In most studies, the RoB was high or unclear due to methodological weaknesses and/or inadequate reporting. Thus, P. ostreatus intake may improve cardiometabolic health, but evidence for this is low. Hence, further clinical trials with an adequate study design are warranted to validate these suggestions.Entities:
Keywords: Pleurotus ostreatus; blood pressure; cardiometabolic health; chronic intake; edible mushrooms; glucose metabolism; human intervention studies; lipids; oyster mushrooms; postprandial
Year: 2020 PMID: 32316680 PMCID: PMC7230384 DOI: 10.3390/nu12041134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flow-diagram of study selection process according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [21].
Effect of the intake of oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus) on cardiometabolic parameters—results from clinical trials.
| Study, Country | Design |
| Participants | Interventions | IP (d) | Results b | Annotations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khatun et al., 2007 [ | SCT | 30 | DMT2 according to OGTT or FPG >8–20 mmol/L and dyslipidemia according to NCEP ATPIII | 7 |
| Study was performed during hospital stay | |||
| ↓ | FPG (I1: – 22%, | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↓ | TGs (I1: – 28%, | ||||||||
| ↔ | HDL-C (I1, I2) | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↓ | SBP (I1: – 4%, | ||||||||
| ↔ | SBP (I2) | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↑ | FPG (+ 13%, | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↑ | TGs (+ 11%, | ||||||||
| ↔ | HDL-C | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↑ | DBP (+ 2%, | ||||||||
| ↔ | SBP | ||||||||
| Kajaba et al., 2008 [ | UCT | 57 | Primarily combined types of dyslipidemia | 42 |
|
| --- | ||
| ↓ | TGs (– 36%, | ||||||||
| ↔ | HDL-C | ||||||||
| ↓ | CD ( | ||||||||
| ↑ | GPX ( | ||||||||
| ↔ | SOD, CAT | ||||||||
| Schneider et al., 2011 [ | RCT | 20 | Moderate untreated hyperlipidemia (TC ≥5.2 mmol/L and/or LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L) | 21 |
|
| Blood collection after an overnight fast | ||
| ↓ | TGs (– 23%, | ||||||||
| ↔ | TC; LDL-C; HDL-C | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↓ | oxLDL (– 11%, | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↑ | TGs (+ 25%, | ||||||||
| ↔ | TC; LDL-C; HDL-C | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↔ | oxLDL | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↓ | TGs (– 0.8 mmol/L, | ||||||||
| ↔ | TC; LDL-C; HDL-C | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↔ | oxLDL | ||||||||
| Choudhury et al., 2013 [ | UCT | 27 | Hypertension and DMT2, drug-treated, men | 90 |
| Subjects were allowed to continue the medication which they were already taking. | |||
| ↓ | FPG (– 18%, | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↓ | SBP (– 10%, | ||||||||
| Choudhury et al., 2013 [ | UCT | 14 | Hypertension (SBP ≥140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥90 mmHg) and BMI >25.0 kg/m2, men | 90 |
| Medication was continued if it was taken previously | |||
| ↓ | TC (– 12%, | ||||||||
| ↔ | TGs; HDL-C | ||||||||
| Sayeed et al., 2014 [ | CT | 40 | DMT2 (FPG 8–12 mmol/L), treated with OHA, age 30–50 y, BMI 22–27 kg/m2, women | 365 d | Field workers supplied mushroom packets twice per week, checked compliance and reported the physician any irregularities in continuing mushroom consumption. | ||||
| ↓ | FPG (– 20%, | ||||||||
| ↓ | TGs (– 20%, | ||||||||
| ↔ | LDL-C; HDL-C | ||||||||
| ↔ | SBP; DBP | ||||||||
| ↔ | FPG; 2hABF e; TG; TC; LDL-C; HDL-C; SBP; DBP | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↓ | FPG ( | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↓ | TGs ( | ||||||||
| ↔ | HDL-C | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ↔ | SBP; DBP | ||||||||
| Jayasuriya et al., 2015 [ | UCT | 22 | Healthy | 14 |
| --- | |||
| ↓ | FPG (– 6%, | ||||||||
| SCT | 14 |
| OGTT: 75 g glucose, dissolved in 300 mL water | ||||||
| ↓ | Glucose 2 h after OGTT (– 16%, | ||||||||
| Jayasuriya et al., 2015 [ | SCT | 14 | DMT2 (FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L) with dietetic treatment | acute |
| OGTT: 75 g glucose, dissolved in 300 mL water | |||
| ↓ | Glucose 2 h after OGTT (– 15%, | ||||||||
| ↑ | Insulin 2 h after OGTT (+ 22%, | ||||||||
a subjects completed study per protocol, in brackets: number of subjects included; b based on analysis per protocol unless indicated otherwise; c based on literature; d investigations were performed bimonthly; results refer only to values obtained after 360 days; e no information on breakfast concerning standardization; 2hABF were compared with baseline values obtained 2 h after OGTT; f bolus ingestion of P. ostreatus or water following a daily intake of P. ostreatus for 14 d; the result reflects the combined effect of acute and chronic intake. ↓ significant decrease; ↑ significant increase; ↔ no significant change (p > 0.05). Data on age and BMI are means ± SEMs or ranges. Values on baseline characteristics were calculated as weighted means from the data of individual groups if not provided by the authors. Missing SEMs were calculated by the SDs of individual groups. BW, body weight; C, control; CAT, catalase; CD, conjugated dienes; CHO, carbohydrates; CT, controlled trial; CVDs, cardiovascular diseases; DAE Department of Agricultural Extension; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DF, dietary fiber; DMT1, diabetes mellitus type 1; DMT2, diabetes mellitus type 2; E, energy; f, females; F, fat; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GIDs, gastrointestinal disorders; GPX, glutathione peroxidase; GSH, glutathione; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; I, intervention; IP, intervention period; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; m, males; n.a., not available; NAMDEC, National Mushroom Development and Extension Center; NCEP ATPIII, National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III; n.d., not detectable; n-3 FA, omega-3 fatty acids; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; OHA, oral hypoglycemic agents; oxLDL, oxidized low-density lipoprotein; P, protein; P. ostreatus, Pleurotus ostreatus; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SCT, self-controlled trial, i.e., all participants received both treatments in the same order; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TC, total cholesterol; TE, treatment effect; TGs, triglycerides; UCT, uncontrolled trial; 2hABF, 2 h after breakfast glucose.
Criteria concerning the quality of the studies to assess risk of bias.
| Khatun et al., 2007 [ | Kajaba et al., 2008 [ | Schneider et al., 2011 [ | Choudhury et al., 2013 [ | Choudhury et al., 2013 [ | Sayeed et al., 2014 [ | Jajasuriya et al., 2015 [ | Jajasuriya et al., 2015 [ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ?/? | √ |
|
| ||||||||
| Controlled | √ | ✕ | √ | ✕ | ✕ | √ | ✕/√ | √ |
| Crossover | ✕ | – | ✕ | – | – | ✕ | –/✕ | ✕ |
| Parallel group | ✕ | – | √ | – | – | √ | –/✕ | ✕ |
| Self-controlled 1 | √ | – | ✕ | – | – | ✕ | –/√ | √ |
| Randomized | ✕ | – | √ 2 | – | – | ✕ | –/✕ | ✕ |
| List generated before start of the study | – | – | ? | – | – | – | –/– | – |
| Adequate randomization method | – | – | ? | – | – | – | –/– | – |
| Allocation concealment | – | – | ? | – | – | – | –/– | – |
| Blinded | ||||||||
| Participants | ✕ | – | ✕ | – | – | ✕ | –/✕ | ✕ |
| Investigators | ? | – | ? | – | – | ? | –/? | ? |
| Outcome assessments | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ?/? | ? |
|
| ||||||||
| Details on intervention | ||||||||
| Source of mushrooms reported | √ | ✕ | ✕ | √ | √ | √ | √/√ | √ |
| Ingredients analyzed | ✕ | ✕ | √ 3 | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕/✕ | ✕ |
| Cultivation conditions of mushrooms | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕/✕ | ✕ |
| Details on the investigation of outcome markers | ✕ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ✕ | ✕/✕ | ✕ |
| Considering potential confounders | ||||||||
| Compliance | √ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | √ | ✕/✕ | – |
| Nutritional behavior | ✕ | ✕ | √ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕/✕ | ✕ |
| Physical activity | ✕ | ✕ | √ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕/✕ | ✕ |
| Body weight/body composition | √ | ✕ | √ | ✕ | ✕ | √ | ✕/✕ | ✕ |
| Medication | ✕ | ✕ | √ | √ | √ | ✕ | ?/? | √ |
|
| ||||||||
| Sample size estimation | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕/✕ | ✕ |
| Details on statistical analysis described | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ✕ | √/√ | √ |
|
| ||||||||
| Dropout | √ | ? | √ | ? | ? | √ | ?/? | ✕ |
| Dropouts reported | √ | ✕ | √ | ✕ | ✕ | √ | ✕/✕ | – |
| Reasons reported | √ | ✕ | √ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕/✕ | – |
| Baseline comparison | – | – | √ | – | – | √ | –/√ | ✕ |
| Full endpoint/no missing data | ✕ | ? | ? | ? | ? | ✕ | ?/? | √ |
| Outcomes reported according to registration | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ?/? | √ |
✕ No, not considered; √ yes, considered; – irrelevant; ? not clear, no details available. 1 self-controlled trial, i.e., all participants received both treatments in the same order; 2 stratification by gender; 3 only analyzed for mevinolin and ergosterols, main ingredients of the soups according to literature.
Figure 2Risk of bias summary. Green (+), low risk of bias; yellow (?), unclear risk of bias; red (–), high risk of bias.