Literature DB >> 32314932

Prostate Mapping for Cancer Diagnosis: The Madrid Protocol. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion and Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsies.

Moises Elias Rodríguez Socarrás1, Juan Gomez Rivas1, Vanesa Cuadros Rivera1, Javier Reinoso Elbers1, Luis Llanes González1, Ivan Michel Mercado1, Julio Fernandez Del Alamo1, Pablo Juarez Del Dago1, Fernando Gomez Sancha1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the prostate cancer detection accuracy of transperineal prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy and micro-ultrasound during the same procedure. Micro-ultrasound is a new high-resolution imaging system that allows real-time targeted biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 194 consecutive patients underwent transperineal prostate biopsies using real-time targeted micro-ultrasound (ExactVu™) and ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (BiopSee®) in the same procedure, from February 2018 to September 2019. Biopsies were performed using a transperineal needle guide attached to the 29 MHz high-resolution micro-ultrasound transducer.
RESULTS: The overall positive rate was 56% (108) for prostate cancer and 42% (81) for clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group greater than 1), and adding micro-ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging detected significantly more clinically significant prostate cancer than systematic biopsy (p <0.001). Micro-ultrasound found 12 of 108 (11%) prostate cancers that were missed by all other techniques and 11 (92%) were clinically significant prostate cancer. PI-RADS® and PRI-MUS™ (Prostate Risk Identification Using Micro-Ultrasound) were strong predictors of clinically significant prostate cancer in a logistic regression model (AUC 0.76). For prostate specific antigen greater than 4 ng/ml, PI-RADS greater than 3, there was an improvement in detection rate between PRI-MUS 4 and PRI-MUS 5 (52% Gleason Grade Group greater than 1 to 92% Gleason Grade Group greater than 1). No fever or clinical infection was observed and 17 (8.7%) patients presented with minor complications (Clavien Dindo I).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study using a transperineal approach for micro-ultrasound guided biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy. The results show a high accuracy for prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis, without infectious complications. The proposed method should be validated in large randomized clinical trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; prostatic neoplasms; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32314932     DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  Use of high-resolution micro-ultrasound to predict extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer prior to surgery: a prospective single-institutional study.

Authors:  Vittorio Fasulo; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Federica Regis; Marco Paciotti; Fancesco Persico; Davide Maffei; Alessandro Uleri; Alberto Saita; Paolo Casale; Rodolfo Hurle; Massimo Lazzeri; Giorgio Guazzoni; Giovanni Lughezzani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Multiparametric ultrasound and micro-ultrasound in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Adriano Basso Dias; Ciara O'Brien; Jean-Michel Correas; Sangeet Ghai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Development and validation of a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and elastography-derived data for the stratification of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zhimin Ding; Di Song; Huaiyu Wu; Hongtian Tian; Xiuqin Ye; Weiyu Liang; Jinfeng Xu; Fajin Dong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-07

4.  Predictive model containing PI-RADS v2 score for postoperative seminal vesicle invasion among prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Mingjian Ruan; He Wang; Xueying Li; Xuege Hu; Hua Liu; Binyi Zhou; Gang Song
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-02

Review 5.  Transrectal Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer: Current Utilization, Integration with mpMRI, HIFU and Other Emerging Applications.

Authors:  John Panzone; Timothy Byler; Gennady Bratslavsky; Hanan Goldberg
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 6.  Alternatives for MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics-Review of Current Ultrasound-Based Techniques.

Authors:  Adam Gurwin; Kamil Kowalczyk; Klaudia Knecht-Gurwin; Paweł Stelmach; Łukasz Nowak; Wojciech Krajewski; Tomasz Szydełko; Bartosz Małkiewicz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Evaluating the diagnostic role of in-bore magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy: a single-centre study.

Authors:  Marc A Furrer; Anne Hong; David Wetherell; Stefan B Heinze; Paul Simkin; Ken Chow; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Homayoun Zargar
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.025

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.