| Literature DB >> 32314673 |
Dan Weaving1,2,3, Nicholas Dalton-Barron1,4,5, Shaun McLaren1,4, Sean Scantlebury1,4, Cloe Cummins1,6,7, Gregory Roe1,8, Ben Jones1,2,4,6,9, Clive Beggs1, Grant Abt3.
Abstract
This study examined the relative contribution of exercise duration and intensity to team-sport athlete's training load. Male, professional rugby league (n = 10) and union (n = 22) players were monitored over 6- and 52-week training periods, respectively. Whole-session (load) and per-minute (intensity) metrics were monitored (league: session rating of perceived exertion training load [sRPE-TL], individualised training impulse, total distance, BodyLoad™; union: sRPE-TL, total distance, high-speed running distance, PlayerLoad™). Separate principal component analyses were conducted on the load and intensity measures to consolidate raw data into principal components (PC, k = 4). The first load PC captured 70% and 74% of the total variance in the rugby league and rugby union datasets, respectively. Multiple linear regression subsequently revealed that session duration explained 73% and 57% of the variance in first load PC, respectively, while the four intensity PCs explained an additional 24% and 34%, respectively. Across two professional rugby training programmes, the majority of the variability in training load measures was explained by session duration (~60-70%), while a smaller proportion was explained by session intensity (~30%). When modelling the training load, training intensity and duration should be disaggregated to better account for their between-session variability.Keywords: Training load; principal component analysis; rugby; time series
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32314673 DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1754725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Sports Sci ISSN: 0264-0414 Impact factor: 3.337