| Literature DB >> 32312990 |
Jiachang Chen1, Yiming Wang1, Zhengtian Ding1, Wangqing Kong2.
Abstract
The restricted availability, expense and toxicity of precious metal catalysts such as rhodium and palladium challenge the sustainability of synthetic chemistry. As such, nickel catalysts have garnered increasing attention as replacements for enyne cyclization reactions. On the other hand, bridged tricyclo[5.2.1.01,5]decanes are found as core structures in many biologically active natural products; however, the synthesis of such frameworks with high functionalities from readily available precursors remains a significant challenge. Herein, we report a nickel-catalyzed asymmetric domino cyclization reaction of enynones, providing rapid and modular synthesis of bridged tricyclo[5.2.1.01,5]decane skeletons with three quaternary stereocenters in good yields and remarkable high levels of regio- and enantioselectivities (92-99% ee).Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32312990 PMCID: PMC7171102 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15837-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Representative examples of bioactive compounds.
Bridged tricyclo[5.2.1.01,5]decane scaffolds are structural cores in many natural products.
Fig. 2Reaction design.
a Ni-catalyzed coupling cyclization of an alkyne and an activated alkene; b Ni-catalyzed asymmetric coupling cyclization of an alkyne and a ketone; c Working hypothesis for bridged tricyclo[5.2.1.01,5]decanes synthesis via coupling cyclization of an alkyne, an alkene and a ketone.
Optimization of reaction conditionsa.
| Entry | Ligand | Solvent | Yield of 4aa (%)b | Yield of 3aa (%)b | ee of 3aa (%)c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MeCN | 60 | Trace | – | |
| 2 | MeOH | 54 | Trace | – | |
| 3 | DMF | 12 | Trace | – | |
| 4 | Toluene | 5 | Trace | – | |
| 5 | TFE | 12 | 33 | 71 | |
| 6 | TFE | Trace | 41 | 65 | |
| 7 | TFE | 12 | 42 | 76 | |
| 8 | TFE | 9 | 46 | 75 | |
| 9 | TFE | 24 | 26 | 60 | |
| 10 | TFE | 20 | Trace | – | |
| 11 | TFE | Trace | 12 | 25 | |
| 12 | TFE | Trace | Trace | – | |
| 13 | TFE | 37 | Trace | – | |
| 14 | TFE | <1 | 77 | 98 | |
TFE 2,2,2-Trifluoroethanol.
aReaction condition: 1a (0.1 mmol), 2a (2 equiv), Ni(OAc)2.4H2O (0.1 equiv), ligand (0.12 equiv), TFE (1 mL) at 100 °C for 48 h.
byields of isolated products.
cDetermined by HPLC on a chiral stationary phase.
Fig. 3Absolute configuration.
ORTEP representation of the product 3aa.
Fig. 4Substrate scope.
a (Hetero)arylboronic acid scope. b Enynone scope. c Acyclic substrate. d Allenynone substrate.
Fig. 5Half-gram scale reaction and synthetic manipulations.
a Half-gram scale reaction. b Synthetic applications. (i) NaBH4, EtOH, 0 °C~ rt; (ii) 4-methoxyaniline (3 equiv), NaBH3CN, MeOH, rt; (iii) allylMgBr, THF, −78 °C-rt; (iv) PPh3MeBr, BuOK, THF, 0 °C-rt; (v) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, DCM, rt; (vi) NaN3, TFA/H2O = 4/1, 70 °C; (vii) O3/PPh3, DCM, −78 °C-rt. m-CPBA m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid, TFA trifluoroacetic acid.
Fig. 6Mechanistic studies.
a Three-component reaction with acetone. b The domino reaction used mono-carbonyl enyne substrate. c The use of stoichiometric aryl-Ni(II) complex in the reaction. d The stoichiometric reaction of Ni(OAc)2.4H2O with boronic acid. e The use of Ni(I) complex in the reaction.
Fig. 7Reaction mechanism.
Proposed catalytic cycle.