Literature DB >> 30205211

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Reaction Bonded Silicon Nitride Implants: Long-Term Case Series of the First Synthetic Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Spacer Implanted in Humans.

Ralph J Mobbs1, Prashanth J Rao2, Kevin Phan2, Philip Hardcastle3, Wen Jie Choy4, Eric R McCartney5, Ross K Druitt6, Christopher A L Mouatt7, Charles C Sorrell8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, a historical case series is reported of reaction bonded silicon nitride (Si3N4) implants for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for a patient population of 30 and surgery levels L3/4, L4/5, and/or L5/S1. Before the study, the only work on Si3N4 as a biomedical material was associated preliminary work, which involved animal trials using a rabbit model. The objective was to undertake the first use of Si3N4 as a biomedical material for humans, as an implant for ALIF.
METHODS: The Si3N4 implants were prepared by die-pressing silicon powder and reaction bonding in 95 N2/5 H2 at ∼1400°C for ∼50 hours. The surgeries involved a retroperitoneal approach for L3/4 and L4/5 levels and a transperitoneal approach for L5/S1 level. The patient follow-up involved assessment of radiologic fusion up to 30 years and clinical outcomes to 10 years.
RESULTS: The reaction bonded Si3N4 implants were found to be biologically safe and to show high fusion rates with minimal subsidence, no abnormal reaction, and no other complications. The primary outcome measure, visual analog scale back pain, improved from a preoperative mean of 8.4 (range, 6-10) to a mean of 3.7 (range, 0-9) at 5 years and a mean of 4.9 (range, 0-9) at 10 years. The Oswestry Disability Index improved from a preoperative mean of 48 (range, 26-84) to a mean of 35 (range, 4-76) at 10 years.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that Si3N4 is biologically safe in the long-term, with capacity for excellent radiologic osseointegration.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  30 years outcome; ALIF spacer; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Human implantation; Intervertebral spacer; Reaction bonded Si(3)N(4); Silicon nitride

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30205211     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

1.  Response to letter by Kersten regarding publication by McEntire et al.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-06

Review 2.  Silicon Nitride as a Biomedical Material: An Overview.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Du; Seunghun S Lee; Gurdial Blugan; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Clinical outcomes for lumbar fusion using silicon nitride versus other biomaterials.

Authors:  Graham C Calvert; George VanBuren Huffmon; William M Rambo; Micah W Smith; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

4.  Clinical outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with silicon nitride spine cages: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Graham C Calvert; George VanBuren Huffmon; William M Rambo; Micah W Smith; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

5.  Two-year results of a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus silicon nitride spinal fusion cages in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders.

Authors:  Bryan J McEntire; Greg Maslin; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.