Literature DB >> 19844656

Overview of disc arthroplasty-past, present and future.

Tamás Fülöp Fekete1, François Porchet.   

Abstract

Degenerative disc disease is one of the most frequent spinal disorders. The anatomy and the biomechanics of the intervertebral disc are very complex, and the pathomechanics of its degeneration are poorly understood. Despite this complexity and uncertainty, great advances have been made in the field of disc replacement technology, with promising results. Difficulties are continuously being encountered, but careful analysis of the results and intensive research and development will assist in countering these problems. There are approximately 40 clinical reports in the literature describing various aspects of randomised controlled trials involving intervertebral disc arthroplasty. However, the majority of these publications do not provide reliable information, in that they give only interim results and/or the results from just one of the many centres in multicentre studies. Such publications must be interpreted with caution, since they do not always represent the results of the whole study population and may hence be underpowered. We identified six randomised controlled trials that compared the final clinical outcomes of disc arthroplasty and spinal fusion. The present systematic review attempts to give an overview of the current status of disc arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19844656     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-009-0529-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.

Authors:  Gregory G Knapik; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ingrid Zechmeister; Roman Winkler; Philipp Mad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Postero-lateral disc prosthesis combined with a unilateral facet replacement device maintains quantity and quality of motion at a single lumbar level.

Authors:  Aniruddh N Nayak; Michael C Doarn; Roger B Gaskins; Chris R James; Andres F Cabezas; Antonio E Castellvi; Brandon G Santoni
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

5.  Correlation of neural foraminal motion after surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy with long-term patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Timothy Baumer; Daniel Oravec; Azam Basheer; Michael J Bey; Stephen W Bartol; Victor Chang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

6.  The innovative viscoelastic CP ESP cervical disk prosthesis with six degrees of freedom: biomechanical concepts, development program and preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Lazennec; Alain Aaron; Olivier Ricart; Jean Patrick Rakover
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.