Literature DB >> 32307516

Psychological support in times of COVID-19: the Essen community-based CoPE concept.

Alexander Bäuerle1, Eva-Maria Skoda1, Nora Dörrie1, Juliane Böttcher2, Martin Teufel1.   

Abstract

The SARS CoV-2-virus (COVID-19) pandemic is pushing national and international structures to their limits. Little is known about treatment options to combat the novel virus, but the same applies to the effects of COVID-19 on people's mental health. In Germany, as in many other countries, governmental actions impact peoples' individual freedom. These highly necessary actions to slow down the spread of the virus, however, are a burden to the community. We established a structured concept to support psychological burdened people in Essen, which is located in the Ruhr area, a metropolitan region with more than 5.1 million inhabitants in the heart of the federal state North Rhine Westphalia. The psychological burden following the spread of the virus and individual restrictions should not be neglected.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32307516      PMCID: PMC7188143          DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


To the Editor

Since the first cases of the SARS CoV-2-virus (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially classified the spread of the virus as the first pandemic since H1N1 in 2009/2010., So far, little is known about treatment options and potential vaccinations to effectively combat COVID-19. However, the same applies for the impact of COVID-19 on people’s mental health. In Germany, as in many other countries, the government determined social distancing, restricted personal lives and put thousands of people under private quarantine. These highly relevant actions to ‘flatten the curve’, however, are a burden to the community. A recent work about the psychological impact of quarantine indicates the psychological strain on those who are not allowed or unable to participate in social life. Besides necessary government regulations in order to slow down the rapid spread of the virus, a COVID-19 crisis strategy to face the increased psychological burden of the community has not been defined yet. We established a structured concept to support psychological burdened people in Essen, which is located in the Ruhr area, a metropolitan region with more than 5.1 million inhabitants in the heart of the federal state North Rhine Westphalia (NRW). NRW is the most populated state and total numbers of COVID-19 infections are the highest in Germany. Given these circumstances, community-based mental health support and interventions are highly needed, but also challenging. ‘Coping with Corona: Extended Psychosomatic care in Essen’ (CoPE) comprises telephone and videoconferencing calls with experts, as well as web contents and online interventions. CoPE is an integrated part of the community emergency action plan and includes a stepped procedure of assessment, indication, counseling and intervention (Fig. 1). The initial contact point is the corona specific hotline of the community of Essen (‘Bürgertelefon’), where citizens can get information about virus specific topics or express COVID-19-related burdens (e.g. distress, worries) [Step 1]. If the latter applies, medical assistants will do further psychological diagnostics (phone-based ‘CoPE hotline’) in order to distinguish the need and appropriate intervention [Step 2]. After triaging by the medical assistants, the citizen is directed to the required expert, i.e. psychologists, physicians (experts in psychosomatic medicine and psychiatry), qualified nursing staff and social workers. The telephone and videoconferencing calls compromise a semi-structured interview, individually need-based content, i.e. the activation of resources, relaxing techniques and support in social law [Step 3]. Aftercare is provided in the form of repeated telephone or videos contacts or by the use of the developed CoPE webpage offering psycho-educational information materials about resources, relaxing techniques and mental health. Additionally, an online intervention ‘CoPE It’ is provided [Step 4]. ‘CoPE It’ consists of four structured modules including psycho-education, mindfulness and cognitive behavioral skills training. During the COVID-19 crisis, implementing structured community-based concepts to support psychological burdened citizens is crucial. Furthermore, authorities and policymakers should be aware of the psychological impact of fear caused by the rapid outbreak of COVID-19 as well as decreed behavioral rules to decelerate the spreading.
Fig. 1

Flow chart of the CoPE concept.

Flow chart of the CoPE concept.

Conflict of interest

We declare no competing interests.

Funding

Not applicable.
  3 in total

1.  Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed.

Authors:  Yu-Tao Xiang; Yuan Yang; Wen Li; Ling Zhang; Qinge Zhang; Teris Cheung; Chee H Ng
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 27.083

2.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence.

Authors:  Samantha K Brooks; Rebecca K Webster; Louise E Smith; Lisa Woodland; Simon Wessely; Neil Greenberg; Gideon James Rubin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

  3 in total
  18 in total

Review 1.  Text Messages in the Field of Mental Health: Rapid Review of the Reviews.

Authors:  Reham Shalaby; Medard K Adu; Hany M El Gindi; Vincent I O Agyapong
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  COVID-19-Related Fear and Health-Related Safety Behavior in Oncological Patients.

Authors:  Venja Musche; Alexander Bäuerle; Jasmin Steinbach; Adam Schweda; Madeleine Hetkamp; Benjamin Weismüller; Hannah Kohler; Mingo Beckmann; Ken Herrmann; Mitra Tewes; Dirk Schadendorf; Eva-Maria Skoda; Martin Teufel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-08-05

3.  Techniques, Methods, and Dissemination of Community-Based Psychological Support Strategies in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Anke-Verena Benecke; Alexander Bäuerle; Christoph Jansen; Johanna Sophie Schneider; Nora Dörrie; Martin Teufel; Eva-Maria Skoda
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

4.  COVID-19: The need to heed distress calls of healthcare workers.

Authors:  Hazel T Biana; Jeremiah Joven B Joaquin
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.341

5.  Facing the future-what lessons could we learn from Covid-19?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.341

6.  An e-mental health intervention to support burdened people in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: CoPE It.

Authors:  Alexander Bäuerle; Johanna Graf; Christoph Jansen; Nora Dörrie; Florian Junne; Martin Teufel; Eva-Maria Skoda
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.341

7.  The Impact of Coping Strategies and Perceived Family Support on Depressive and Anxious Symptomatology During the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) Lockdown.

Authors:  Rachele Mariani; Alessia Renzi; Michela Di Trani; Guido Trabucchi; Kerri Danskin; Renata Tambelli
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Not all world leaders use Twitter in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: impact of the way of Angela Merkel on psychological distress, behaviour and risk perception.

Authors:  Martin Teufel; Adam Schweda; Nora Dörrie; Venja Musche; Madeleine Hetkamp; Benjamin Weismüller; Henrike Lenzen; Mark Stettner; Hannah Kohler; Alexander Bäuerle; Eva-Maria Skoda
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.341

9.  ChurchInAction: the role of religious interventions in times of COVID-19.

Authors:  Fides A Del Castillo; Hazel T Biana; Jeremiah Joven B Joaquin
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.341

10.  Mental health services for infectious disease outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review.

Authors:  Jing-Li Yue; Wei Yan; Yan-Kun Sun; Kai Yuan; Si-Zhen Su; Ying Han; Arun V Ravindran; Thomas Kosten; Ian Everall; Christopher G Davey; Edward Bullmore; Norito Kawakami; Corrado Barbui; Graham Thornicroft; Crick Lund; Xiao Lin; Lin Liu; Le Shi; Jie Shi; Mao-Sheng Ran; Yan-Ping Bao; Lin Lu
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 7.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.