Literature DB >> 32305163

Grade of injury, not initial management, is associated with unplanned interventions in liver injury.

Armin Edalatpour1, Brian T Young1, Laura R Brown1, Esther S Tseng1, Husayn A Ladhani1, Nimitt J Patel1, Jeffrey A Claridge1, Vanessa P Ho2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Risk factors for complications after liver injury do not distinguish between patients undergoing selective non-operative management (sNOM) vs operative management (OM) as the initial treatment strategy. Our objective was to identify risk factors for complications requiring an unplanned intervention following sNOM or OM. We hypothesized that patient undergoing sNOM will have fewer unplanned interventions.
METHODS: Adults presenting to a level I trauma center with grade III or higher liver injury over a period of 6 years were reviewed. Patient and injury factors, initial management strategy, subsequent complications and interventions were obtained. Bivariate analysis was performed between patients undergoing sNOM vs OM to determine factors associated with unplanned interventions, defined as intervention >48 h after injury. Logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for unplanned interventions.
RESULTS: 191 patients were identified: 105 (55%) grade III, 64 (34%) grade IV, and 22 (12%) grade V injury; 136 (71%) underwent sNOM and 55 (29%) underwent OM. 21 (15%) patients required an unplanned intervention: 26 percutaneous drainage, 10 ERCP, and 3 angiography; 12 had multiple procedures. Male gender, younger age, higher ISS, higher grade of injury, firearm mechanism, and initial OM (all p < 0.05) were associated with unplanned interventions. Firearm mechanism and injury grade IV and V, but not initial OM, were independent risk factors for an unplanned intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Grade of liver injury, not the initial mode of treatment, was significantly associated with requiring an unplanned intervention for liver-related complications. Surveillance at 7-10 days, or prior to discharge, in the high-risk group may be able to capture those requiring unplanned intervention and readmission.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver injury; Non-operative management; Operative management; Unplanned procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32305163      PMCID: PMC7331849          DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.03.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  16 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment of injuries to the solid abdominal organs: a 50-year perspective from the Journal of Trauma.

Authors:  Andrew B Peitzman; J David Richardson
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-11

Review 2.  A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of non-operative management in patients with high grade liver injury.

Authors:  Yosuf Saqib
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.392

3.  Nonoperative management of blunt liver trauma: the value of follow-up abdominal computed tomography scans.

Authors:  R F Cuff; T H Cogbill; P J Lambert
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision).

Authors:  E E Moore; T H Cogbill; G J Jurkovich; S R Shackford; M A Malangoni; H R Champion
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1995-03

5.  Evolution in the management of hepatic trauma: a 25-year perspective.

Authors:  J David Richardson; G A Franklin; J K Lukan; E H Carrillo; D A Spain; F B Miller; M A Wilson; H C Polk; L M Flint
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Complications of nonoperative management of high-grade blunt hepatic injuries.

Authors:  Rosemary A Kozar; John B Moore; Sarah E Niles; John B Holcomb; Ernest E Moore; C Clay Cothren; Elizabeth Hartwell; Frederick A Moore
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-11

Review 7.  Management of liver trauma.

Authors:  S A Badger; R Barclay; P Campbell; D J Mole; T Diamond
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline.

Authors:  Nicole A Stassen; Indermeet Bhullar; Julius D Cheng; Marie Crandall; Randall Friese; Oscar Guillamondegui; Randeep Jawa; Adrian Maung; Thomas J Rohs; Ayodele Sangosanya; Kevin Schuster; Mark Seamon; Kathryn M Tchorz; Ben L Zarzuar; Andrew Kerwin
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 9.  Outcomes and complications of angioembolization for hepatic trauma: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher S Green; Eileen M Bulger; Sharon W Kwan
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.313

10.  Complications of high grade liver injuries: management and outcomewith focus on bile leaks.

Authors:  Miklosh Bala; Samir Abu Gazalla; Mohammad Faroja; Allan I Bloom; Gideon Zamir; Avraham I Rivkind; Gidon Almogy
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Clinical outcomes of non-operative management and clinical observation in non-angioembolised hepatic trauma: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Francesco Virdis; Mauro Podda; Salomone Di Saverio; Jayant Kumar; Roberto Bini; Carlos Pilasi; Isabella Reccia
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2022-04-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.