Literature DB >> 3230488

Aging and luminance-adaptation effects on spatial contrast sensitivity.

M E Sloane1, C Owsley, C A Jackson.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity as a function of target luminance for four spatial frequencies (0.5, 2, 4, and 8 cycles/deg) was measured in younger (n = 12; age range, 19-35 years) and older (n = 11; age range, 68-79 years) adults in order to examine the feasibility of optical and neural explanations for the impairment of contrast sensitivity in older adults. All subjects were free from identifiable ocular disease and had good acuity. Sensitivity for each spatial frequency was measured at eight luminance levels spanning 3.5 log units in the photopic-mesopic range. When gratings were flickered at 0.5 Hz, functions for older adults were displaced downward on the sensitivity axis across all luminance levels, and the slopes of these functions were steeper than those for younger adults, suggesting that optical mechanisms alone cannot account for the vision loss in older adults. Further measurements, in which spatial targets were flickered at 7.5 Hz, indicated that this faster temporal modulation affected sensitivity as a function of luminance differentially in younger and older adults. These data imply that the neural mechanisms subserving human spatial vision undergo significant changes during adulthood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3230488     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.5.002181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  26 in total

Review 1.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Evidence against age-related enlargements of ganglion cell receptive field centers under scotopic conditions.

Authors:  Brooke E Schefrin; Monika Hauser; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Comparison of the effects of Alzheimer's disease, normal aging and scopolamine on human transient visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  A T Smith; F Early; G H Jones
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Age-related deterioration of rod vision in mice.

Authors:  Alexander V Kolesnikov; Jie Fan; Rosalie K Crouch; Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; William J Donnelly; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Aging and blur adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Joseph L Hardy; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Simulating age-related optical changes in the human eye.

Authors:  D Whitaker; D B Elliott
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Scotopic spatiotemporal sensitivity differences between young and old adults.

Authors:  Cynthia L Clark; Joseph L Hardy; Vicki J Volbrecht; John S Werner
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Luminance affects age-related deficits in object detection: implications for computerized psychological assessments.

Authors:  Daniel R Seichepine; Sandy Neargarder; Meaghan E McCallum; Kristin Tabor; Tatiana M Riedel; Grover C Gilmore; Alice Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-11-07

10.  Role of high-order aberrations in senescent changes in spatial vision.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Joseph L Hardy; Julia W Evans; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.