Literature DB >> 32304767

Differences in abortion rates by race-ethnicity after implementation of a restrictive Texas law.

Vinita Goyal1, Isabel H McLoughlin Brooks2, Daniel A Powers2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between a restrictive Texas law, House Bill 2 (HB2), and receipt of in-clinic abortion by patient's race-ethnicity. STUDY
DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, we collected Texas state statistics on number of abortions, abortions per county, and abortions per county by race-ethnicity for 2012, before HB2 was enacted, and 2015, after HB2 was in effect. Using female reproductive-aged population estimates, we calculated the abortion rate and percent change in the abortion rate between the two time periods by county, patient residence in a county with an open clinic or HB2-related clinic closure, and change in distance to an open clinic for each race-ethnicity. We also used geospatial analyses to depict the greatest decrease in abortion rate by race-ethnicity and county.
RESULTS: In Texas, there were 64,716 reported abortions in 2012 and 54,253 in 2015. Statewide, there was a 20% decrease in the abortion rate affecting all racial-ethnic groups, yet the reduction was greater among Hispanic women compared to White women (-25% vs. -16%, respectively). The abortion rate also decreased more among those living in a county with an HB2-related clinic closure, especially for Hispanic women (-41% Hispanic vs. -29% White vs. -30% Black vs. -3% Other). Hispanic women whose travel distance increased 100+ miles had the greatest reduction in the abortion rate (-43%). Geospatial mapping confirmed our quantitative findings.
CONCLUSION: HB2 led to a disproportionate reduction in the abortion rate among Hispanic women in Texas, including those living in counties with a closed clinic or traveling long distances to obtain in-clinic abortion care. IMPLICATIONS: Restrictive abortion policies in Texas may disproportionately burden Hispanic women and those affected by clinic closures.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion rate; Disparity; Induced abortion; Legislation; Race–ethnicity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32304767      PMCID: PMC7473327          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.051


  17 in total

1.  Low-Income Texas Women's Experiences Accessing Their Desired Contraceptive Method at the First Postpartum Visit.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Chloe H Dillaway; Caitlin Canfield; Daniela M Kuhn; Katherine S Strandberg; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-12-03

2.  Access to abortion services: a neglected health disparity.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Tracy Weitz
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-05

3.  Change in Distance to Nearest Facility and Abortion in Texas, 2012 to 2014.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Women's experiences seeking publicly funded family planning services in Texas.

Authors:  Kristine Hopkins; Kari White; Fran Linkin; Celia Hubert; Daniel Grossman; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-01-30

5.  Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Sarah Baum; Liza Fuentes; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Amanda Stevenson; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Postabortion Contraceptive Use and Continuation When Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Is Free.

Authors:  Vinita Goyal; Caitlin Canfield; Abigail R A Aiken; Amna Dermish; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Cutting family planning in Texas.

Authors:  Kari White; Daniel Grossman; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Women's experiences seeking abortion care shortly after the closure of clinics due to a restrictive law in Texas.

Authors:  Liza Fuentes; Sharon Lebenkoff; Kari White; Caitlin Gerdts; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Disparities in abortion rates: a public health approach.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Lisa H Harris; Tracy A Weitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Women's Experience Obtaining Abortion Care in Texas after Implementation of Restrictive Abortion Laws: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sarah E Baum; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Border-state abortions increased for Texas residents after House Bill 2.

Authors:  Sarah Raifman; Gracia Sierra; Daniel Grossman; Sarah E Baum; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter; Kari White
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Time from first clinical contact to abortion in Texas and California.

Authors:  Madeline Adams; Gennifer Kully; Sarah Tilford; Kari White; Sheila Mody; Marisa Hildebrand; Nicole Johns; Daniel Grossman; Sarah Averbach
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Identifying data for the empirical assessment of law (IDEAL): a realist approach to research gaps on the health effects of abortion law.

Authors:  Scott Burris; Adrienne R Ghorashi; Lindsay Foster Cloud; Rachel Rebouché; Patty Skuster; Antonella Lavelanet
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.