Literature DB >> 25128413

Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas.

Daniel Grossman1, Sarah Baum2, Liza Fuentes2, Kari White3, Kristine Hopkins4, Amanda Stevenson4, Joseph E Potter4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In 2013, Texas passed omnibus legislation restricting abortion services. Provisions restricting medical abortion, banning most procedures after 20 weeks and requiring physicians to have hospital-admitting privileges were enforced in November 2013; by September 2014, abortion facilities must meet the requirements of ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). We aimed to rapidly assess the change in abortion services after the first three provisions went into effect. STUDY
DESIGN: We requested information from all licensed Texas abortion facilities on abortions performed between November 2012 and April 2014, including the abortion method and gestational age (< 12 weeks vs. ≥ 12 weeks).
RESULTS: In May 2013, there were 41 facilities providing abortion in Texas; this decreased to 22 in November 2013. Both clinics closed in the Rio Grande Valley, and all but one closed in West Texas. Comparing November 2012-April 2013 to November 2013-April 2014, there was a 13% decrease in the abortion rate (from 12.9 to 11.2 abortions/1000 women age 15-44). Medical abortion decreased by 70%, from 28.1% of all abortions in the earlier period to 9.7% after November 2013 (p<0.001). Second-trimester abortion increased from 13.5% to 13.9% of all abortions (p<0.001). Only 22% of abortions were performed in the state's six ASCs.
CONCLUSIONS: The closure of clinics and restrictions on medical abortion in Texas appear to be associated with a decline in the in-state abortion rate and a marked decrease in the number of medical abortions. IMPLICATIONS: Supply-side restrictions on abortion - especially restrictions on medical abortion - can have a profound impact on access to services. Access to abortion care will become even further restricted in Texas when the ASC requirement goes into effect in 2014.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Access; Law; Restriction; Texas

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25128413      PMCID: PMC4179978          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  11 in total

1.  The supply-side economics of abortion.

Authors:  Theodore Joyce
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Self-induction of abortion among women in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Kelsey Holt; Melanie Peña; Diana Lara; Maggie Veatch; Denisse Córdova; Marji Gold; Beverly Winikoff; Kelly Blanchard
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2010-11

3.  Obstacles to the integration of abortion into obstetrics and gynecology practice.

Authors:  Lori Freedman; Uta Landy; Philip Darney; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2010-09

Review 4.  First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Raymond; Caitlin Shannon; Mark A Weaver; Beverly Winikoff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Kathryn Kooistra
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-01-10

6.  Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Jenna Jerman
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-02-03

7.  Cutting family planning in Texas.

Authors:  Kari White; Daniel Grossman; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Linda A Bartlett; Cynthia J Berg; Holly B Shulman; Suzanne B Zane; Clarice A Green; Sara Whitehead; Hani K Atrash
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Determinants of demand: method selection and provider preference among US women seeking abortion services.

Authors:  Tara Shochet; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  The public health threat of anti-abortion legislation.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  50 in total

1.  Constructing a longitudinal database of targeted regulation of abortion providers laws.

Authors:  Nichole Austin; Sam Harper
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Change in Distance to Nearest Facility and Abortion in Texas, 2012 to 2014.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2014.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Jill Shah; Michele G Mandel; Jamie W Krashin; Danielle B Suchdev; Denise J Jamieson; Karen Pazol
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2018-11-23

4.  Women's experiences seeking publicly funded family planning services in Texas.

Authors:  Kristine Hopkins; Kari White; Fran Linkin; Celia Hubert; Daniel Grossman; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-01-30

5.  Postabortion Contraceptive Use and Continuation When Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Is Free.

Authors:  Vinita Goyal; Caitlin Canfield; Abigail R A Aiken; Amna Dermish; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  A 21st-Century Public Health Approach to Abortion.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Liza Fuentes; Nancy F Berglas; Amanda J Dennis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Dramatic Decreases in US Abortion Rates: Public Health Achievement or Failure?

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  State Law Approaches to Facility Regulation of Abortion and Other Office Interventions.

Authors:  Bonnie S Jones; Sara Daniel; Lindsay K Cloud
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Reconstructing a Pregnancy Cohort to Examine Potential Selection Bias in Studies on Racial Disparities in Preterm Delivery.

Authors:  Katherine J Sapra; Ashok K Chaurasia; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Katherine A Ahrens
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  Counseling and referrals for women with unplanned pregnancies at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas.

Authors:  Kari White; Katelin Adams; Kristine Hopkins
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.