Literature DB >> 32304725

Environmental virus surveillance in the isolation ward of COVID-19.

H Wang1, P Mo2, G Li3, P Chen4, J Liu1, H Wang1, F Wang5, Y Zhang6, Q Zhao7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32304725      PMCID: PMC7159873          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, Since December 2019, novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)-infected pneumonia (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan and spread rapidly across the world [1]. Recent studies mainly focused on the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with confirmed infection [1,2]. Little attention has been paid to environmental virus surveillance in the isolation ward of COVID-19. Thus, we conducted this study to evaluate the sites of environmental contamination on a COVID-19 isolation ward. The isolation ward was divided into three zones (clean zone, contaminated zone, and semi-contaminated zone) with two access points for patients and medical staff, respectively. All medical staff took strict personal protective equipment and disinfection before entering and leaving the contaminated zone. The clean zone and contaminated zone were disinfected with 1000 mg/L chlorine dioxide for 30 min, including ground, wall, and surface objects. Air was disinfected using an air sterilizer according to the manufacturer's protocol and ventilated twice a day for 30 min each. A total of 84 sites of the isolation ward had a surface virus nucleic acid tested by swab sampling. The sites included the surfaces of chairs, printer, keyboard, telephone, table, trolley, drawer, air sterilizer, personal digital assistant (PDA), blood sugar meter, blood pressure meter, corridor handrail, stair handrail, water-free hand sanitizer, wheelchair, fridge, washstand, and multiple sites in the patient room. The RT–PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 amplified simultaneously two target genes: open reading frame 1ab (ORF1ab) and the ORF for the nucleocapsid protein (N). Positive (pseudovirus with a fragment of ORF1ab and N) and negative (pseudovirus with a standard fragment) quality control samples were tested simultaneously. A cycle threshold (CT) value of <37 was defined as a positive test according to the recommendation from the National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention (China) [3]. All patients in the contaminated zone were COVID-19 confirmed patients with a positive nucleic acid test. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (No. 2020011). Nucleic acid detection was positive in six (7.1%) locations. In the semi-contaminated zone, three sites had positive detection of SARS-CoV-2, namely the surface of the drawer in the nurse station, and the washstand and drawer in the treatment room. In the contaminated zone, no sites in the patient room tested positive but one PDA was positive for the virus. In the clean zone, two sites had positive virus detection, namely the surface of the telephone receiver in the physician office and a push button of the water-free hand sanitizer. In this study, we performed viral nucleic acid tests on contaminated, semi-contaminated, and clean zones of the COVID-19 isolation ward. Most sites tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Negative virus detection in the patients’ room may reflect the effectiveness of daily disinfection. However, the drawer at the nurse station had a positive detection; the virus could have been brought to this location by the nurses' frequent journeys in and out to care for the patients. In addition, we were not surprised by the positive detection in the treatment room, where patients underwent additional treatments, and the virus load may have been too high to be completely eliminated by routine disinfection. When the result was obtained, we told the cleaning staff to disinfect the abovementioned positive sites twice a day, including disinfecting the surface with 2000 mg/L of chlorine dioxide, and spraying 1000 mg/L of chlorine dioxide to disinfect the air in the treatment room. Surprisingly, as the most frequently touched sites in the clean area, the surface of the telephone receiver in the physician office and the press button of the water-free hand sanitizer, had positive virus detection. These findings indicated that daily disinfection should be strengthened in the clean area of isolation ward. Moreover, it is equally important to keep the hands sanitized by using hand sanitizers. In conclusion, to avoid apparent and occult SARS-CoV-2 infections among the medical staff, daily disinfection should be strengthened in both the contaminated zone and the clean zone of the isolation ward.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding sources

This study was supported by the Program of Excellent Doctoral (Postdoctoral) Study of Zhongnan Hospital of (Grant No. ZNYB2019003).
  2 in total

1.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Bo Hu; Chang Hu; Fangfang Zhu; Xing Liu; Jing Zhang; Binbin Wang; Hui Xiang; Zhenshun Cheng; Yong Xiong; Yan Zhao; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records.

Authors:  Huijun Chen; Juanjuan Guo; Chen Wang; Fan Luo; Xuechen Yu; Wei Zhang; Jiafu Li; Dongchi Zhao; Dan Xu; Qing Gong; Jing Liao; Huixia Yang; Wei Hou; Yuanzhen Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 79.321

  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  Using a 5G network in hospitals to reduce nosocomial infection during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Li Wen; Zhiwen Ou; Wenzhou Duan; Weijie Zhu; Xiongzhi Xiao; Ying Zhang; Huanquan Luo; Weibin Cheng; Wanmin Lian
Journal:  Commun Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 2.  Nosocomial infection of COVID‑19: A new challenge for healthcare professionals (Review).

Authors:  Qiu Du; Dingding Zhang; Weimin Hu; Xuefei Li; Qiongrong Xia; Taishen Wen; Haiping Jia
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.101

3.  [Is Disinfection of Public Surfaces useful for the Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infections?]

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Lutz Jatzwauk
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2021-02-04

4.  Designing Mobile Epidemic Prevention Medical Stations for the COVID-19 Pandemic and International Medical Aid.

Authors:  Mi-Zuo Gao; Ying-Hsiang Chou; Yan-Zin Chang; Jar-Yuan Pai; Henry Bair; Sharon Pai; Nai-Chi Yu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 5.  Potential sources, modes of transmission and effectiveness of prevention measures against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  G Kampf; Y Brüggemann; H E J Kaba; J Steinmann; S Pfaender; S Scheithauer; E Steinmann
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  A Novel Non-contact Self-Injection-Locked Radar for Vital Sign Sensing and Body Movement Monitoring in COVID-19 Isolation Ward.

Authors:  Cheng-Yu Tsai; Nai-Chien Chang; Hsiu-Chen Fang; Ying-Che Chen; Su-Shin Lee
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Response of a Radiology Department to the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: The Experience of the Hospital "Policlinico Tor Vergata" in Rome.

Authors:  Andrea Malizia; Laura Filograna; Francesco Paolo Sbordone; Giorgio Ciccarese; Andrea Carbone; Beatrice Carreri; Colleen Patricia Ryan; Gian Marco Ludovici; Andrea Chierici; Guglielmo Manenti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.