Literature DB >> 32302817

When health professionals look death in the eye: the mental health of professionals who deal daily with the 2019 coronavirus outbreak.

Modesto Leite Rolim Neto1, Hiure Gomes Almeida2, Joana D'arc Esmeraldo2, Camila Bezerra Nobre2, Woneska Rodrigues Pinheiro3, Cícera Rejane Tavares de Oliveira3, Itamara da Costa Sousa3, Onélia Maria Moreira Leite Lima4, Nádia Nara Rolim Lima5, Marcial Moreno Moreira6, Carlos Kennedy Tavares Lima4, Jucier Gonçalves Júnior7, Claúdio Gleideston Lima da Silva8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The fact that COVID-19 is transmissible from human to human and associated with high morbidity and potentially fatality can intensify the perception of personal danger. In addition, the foreseeable shortage of supplies and an increasing flow of suspected and real cases of COVID-19 contribute to the pressures and concerns of health professionals.
METHOD: The studies were identified in well-known international journals found in two electronic databases: Scopus and Embase. The data were cross-checked with information from the main international newspapers.
RESULTS: Work-related stress is a potential cause of concern for health professionals. It has been associated with anxiety including multiple clinical activities, depression in the face of the coexistence of countless deaths, long work shifts with the most diverse unknowns and demands in the treatment with patients with COVID-19. Therefore, it is an important indicator of psychic exhaustion.
CONCLUSIONS: As coronavirus cases increase and deaths surge in Italy, new figures show an "enormous" level of contagion among the country's medical personnel. At least 2,629 health workers have been infected with coronavirus since the outbreak onset in February, representing 8.3% of total cases. The percentage of infected health workers has almost doubled the number registered in China throughout the epidemic. Intensive care unit physicians are on their stress limit, especially when dealing with older patients and with death prospects. Doctors, not a relative, are inevitably the last people a dying COVID-19 patient will see.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Health professionals; Psychic exhaustion

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32302817      PMCID: PMC7152886          DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak continues to evolve, with more cases and quarantines popping up on news feeds everywhere. The closer it gets to their homes, the more people become worried. But what about people on the front lines? Nurses, doctors, healthcare workers, and other medical professionals who are testing for and treating patients with COVID-19 are at a higher risk of contracting it than the general public. What can they do to take care of themselves, physically and emotionally? (Magellan Health Insights, 2020). As if exposure to the COVID-19 during the global pandemic was not enough, healthcare workers face another risk: burnout due to overstress in an increasingly burdened healthcare system. The combination of stress and possible exposure puts healthcare professionals, from physicians and nurses to specialists, at greater risk of contracting COVID-19 and potentially spreading it to others (Health Care Finance, 2020). Given this critical situation, health professionals directly involved in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients with COVID-19 develop the insertion of psychic spaces for the installation of pain and psychological suffering and other mental health symptoms. The growing number of confirmed and suspected cases, overwhelming workload, depletion of personal protective equipment, extensive media coverage, lack of specific medications and inadequate support feelings can contribute to the mental burden of these health professionals (State Council of China, 2020, Lai et al., 2020, Lee et al., 2007). Work-related stress is a potential cause of concern for health professionals. It has been associated with anxiety including multiple clinical activities, depression in the face of the coexistence of countless deaths, long work shifts with the most diverse unknowns and demands in the treatment with patients with COVID-19. Therefore, it is an important indicator of psychic exhaustion (Adams and Walls, 2020; Kushal et al., 2018). It is the classic rock-and-a-hard-place scenario – healthcare workers and caregivers are desperately needed during the global response to the outbreak, but they represent one of the most vulnerable populations in terms of contracting the highly virulent disease (Admas and Walls, 2020). The difficulty in assessing the extent to which health professionals have been affected emotionally is difficult because the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), medical associations or unions of health professionals have not released worldwide data yet (Washington Post, 2020). Dozens of health care professionals on the front lines of the coronavirus pandemic have become ill with the coronavirus and more have been in quarantine after being exposed to it (Changing America, 2020). The fact that COVID-19 is transmissible from human to human (Li et al., 2020, Rothe et al., 2020) and associated with high morbidity and potentially fatality can intensify the perception of personal danger (Wang, Tang and Wie, 2020). In addition, the foreseeable shortage of supplies and increasing flow of suspected and real cases of COVID-19 contribute to the pressures and concerns of health professionals (Lai et al., 2020, Adams and Walls, 2020, Kushal et al., 2018, Chan-Yeung, 2004). Coronavirus generates a lot of uncertainty, and this has resonance with health professionals who suffer or have suffered from anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in the treatment of patients in hospitals. Panic attacks can also be a response to the stress load linked to the coronavirus outbreak demands (The Guardian, 2020, Lai et al., 2020, Adams and Walls, 2020, Lee et al., 2007). As coronavirus cases increase and deaths surge in Italy, new figures show an "enormous" level of contagion among the country's medical personnel. At least 2,629 health workers have been infected with coronavirus since the outbreak onset in February, representing 8.3% of total cases. The percentage of infected health workers has almost doubled the number registered in China throughout the epidemic (Aljazeera, 2020). Intensive care unit physicians are on their stress limit, especially when dealing with older patients and with death prospects. Doctors, not a relative, are inevitably the last people a dying COVID-19 patient will see (Lima et al., 2020, Carvalho et al., 2020, Moreira et al., 2020, Reteurs, 2020). Despite the common mental health problems and disorders found among health professionals in such settings, most of those working in isolation units and hospitals are not trained to provide mental health care. Evidence highlights some timely mental health care that needs to be developed urgently, such as: use of psychotropic drugs, prescribed by psychiatrists for severe psychiatric comorbidities; specialized psychiatric treatments and appropriate mental health services and facilities for patients with comorbid mental disorders; psychic treatment plans, psychiatric illness progress reports, and health status updates for professionals in the Intensive Care Unit; regular updates to address their sense of uncertainty and fear; psychological counseling using electronic devices and applications (such as smartphones and WeChat); provision of emotional and behavioral responses to extraordinary stress, and psychotherapy techniques such as those based on the stress adaptation model (Xiang et al., 2020, Maunder et al., 2003, Folkman and Greer, 2000).

Authors’ contributions

MLRN, MMM, CKTL, CGLS, JGJ and NNRL designed the review, developed the inclusion criteria, screened titles and abstracts, appraised the quality of included papers, and drafted the manuscript. HGA, JDE, CBN, CRTO and WRP reviewed the study protocol and inclusion criteria and provided substantial input to the manuscript. MLRN, NNRL, ICS and OMMLL reviewed the study protocol. MMM read and screened articles for inclusion. All authors critically reviewed drafts and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The Suicidology Research Group from Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) and Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) – institution linked to the Brazilian Department of Science, Technology and Innovation to encourage research in Brazil.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  13 in total

1.  Supporting the Health Care Workforce During the COVID-19 Global Epidemic.

Authors:  James G Adams; Ron M Walls
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  What does the future hold for doctors and suicide?

Authors:  Marcial Moreno Moreira; Modesto Leite Rolim Neto
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 3.  Promoting psychological well-being in the face of serious illness: when theory, research and practice inform each other.

Authors:  S Folkman; S Greer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and healthcare workers.

Authors:  Moira Chan-Yeung
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec

5.  The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Robert Maunder; Jonathan Hunter; Leslie Vincent; Jocelyn Bennett; Nathalie Peladeau; Molyn Leszcz; Joel Sadavoy; Lieve M Verhaeghe; Rosalie Steinberg; Tony Mazzulli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Updated understanding of the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Weier Wang; Jianming Tang; Fangqiang Wei
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.327

7.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

Authors:  Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 176.079

8.  Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed.

Authors:  Yu-Tao Xiang; Yuan Yang; Wen Li; Ling Zhang; Qinge Zhang; Teris Cheung; Chee H Ng
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 27.083

Review 9.  The emotional impact of Coronavirus 2019-nCoV (new Coronavirus disease).

Authors:  Carlos Kennedy Tavares Lima; Poliana Moreira de Medeiros Carvalho; Igor de Araújo Araruna Silva Lima; José Victor Alexandre de Oliveira Nunes; Jeferson Steves Saraiva; Ricardo Inácio de Souza; Claúdio Gleidiston Lima da Silva; Modesto Leite Rolim Neto
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.222

10.  Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Jianbo Lai; Simeng Ma; Ying Wang; Zhongxiang Cai; Jianbo Hu; Ning Wei; Jiang Wu; Hui Du; Tingting Chen; Ruiting Li; Huawei Tan; Lijun Kang; Lihua Yao; Manli Huang; Huafen Wang; Gaohua Wang; Zhongchun Liu; Shaohua Hu
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-03-02
View more
  65 in total

1.  Factors Associated With Psychiatric Adverse Effects in Healthcare Personnel During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ecuador.

Authors:  Edgar Efraín Pazmiño Erazo; María José Alvear Velásquez; Ivonne Gisselle Saltos Chávez; David Emanuel Pazmiño Pullas
Journal:  Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed)       Date:  2021-02-20

2.  Assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on intensive care workers: A single-centre cross-sectional UK-based study.

Authors:  Natasha Dykes; Oliver Johnson; Peter Bamford
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2021-01-05

3.  Sociodemographic and Psychological Predictors of Resilience Among Frontline Nurses Fighting the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yang Xiong; Lei Zhang; Xiaofeng Jiang; Xiaoqian Zhuang; Lingyao Meng; Lingli Peng; Jing Wu
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.556

4.  Mobile app helps trainees manage emergencies at the bedside.

Authors:  Andrew L Chu; Yonatan G Keschner; Lucinda Lai; Joshua J Baugh; Christopher W Baugh; Paul D Biddinger; Ali S Raja; Eric M Isselbacher; Jared Conley
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-08-01

5.  Mental health policy: protecting community mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Retno Lestari; Febri Endra Budi Setyawan
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2021-04-14

6.  Stress-induced cognition among radiologic technologists in COVID-19 quarantine centres in Palestine.

Authors:  Omar Rimawi; Hussein ALMasri
Journal:  Clin Psychol Psychother       Date:  2021-03-29

7.  OncoAlert Round Table Discussions: The Global COVID-19 Experience.

Authors:  Gilberto Morgan; Evandro de Azambuja; Kevin Punie; Felipe Ades; Kathrin Heinrich; Nicola Personeni; Ramy Rahme; Roberto Ferrara; Kevin Pels; Marina Garassino; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Gilberto Lopes; Fabrice Barlesi; Toni K Choueiri; Howard Burris; Solange Peters
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2021-04

8.  A Reflection on the Main Ethical Obstacles Related to the Strategic Action "O Brasil Conta Comigo".

Authors:  Jucycler Ferreira Freitas; Jucier Gonçalves Júnior; Estelita Lima Cândido
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Depression as a mediator between fear of COVID-19 and death anxiety.

Authors:  Selim Gundogan; Ibrahim Arpaci
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-04-26

10.  Conducting research in Radiation Oncology remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic: Coping with isolation.

Authors:  Jennifer Dhont; Marialaura Di Tella; Ludwig Dubois; Marianne Aznar; Steven Petit; Mateusz Spałek; Luca Boldrini; Pierfrancesco Franco; Jenny Bertholet
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.