Literature DB >> 32302815

Psychological status of surgical staff during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Jian Xu1, Qian-Hui Xu2, Chang-Ming Wang3, Jun Wang3.   

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which appeared in early December 2019, had an atypical viral pneumonia outbreak in Wuhan, Hubei, China. And there is a high risk of global proliferation and impact. The sudden increase in confirmed cases has brought tremendous stress and anxiety to frontline surgical staff. The results showed that the anxiety and depression of surgical staff during the outbreak period were significantly higher and mental health problems appeared, so psychological interventions are essential.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32302815      PMCID: PMC7151272          DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


Dear editor, In the outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia that occurred in early December 2019, the World Health Organization named this new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (XINHUANET, 2020). The World Health Organization has raised the assessment of the global spread and risk of COVID-19 virus to "very high" (WHO March 2020). As of March 21, 81,416 people had been diagnosed with new coronary pneumonia in China, and 3261 had died. More than 188,876 confirmed cases and 7956 deaths occurred in more than 160 countries around the world. The sudden increase in confirmed cases has brought tremendous stress and anxiety to frontline medical staff. This includes not only internal medicine departments such as the respiratory department, but also surgical medical staff is also facing huge pressure. Therefore, this study hopes to draw public attention to the mental health of surgical staff. A total of 120 subjects from the surgical medical staff of Baoshan Branch of Shanghai Shuguang Hospital were divided into two groups (60 in each group) at two time periods (outbreak period: January 28, 2020 to February 29, 2020; Non-epidemic outbreak period: March 2nd to March 21st, 2020) fill out four scales (Anxiety scale, Depression score, Dream anxiety score and SF-36 scale). By comparing the capital data of surgical staff from different periods of the epidemic, we found that there was no significant difference in the age, gender, and marital status of the surgical staff in the two periods(P>0.05). According to statistics, the anxiety score of surgical staff during the outbreak period was 7.817 ± 2.508, of which 28 were positive (≥8 points). The anxiety score of surgical staff during the non-outbreak period was 5.283 ± 1.738, of which 6 were anxiety positive. The anxiety score of the surgical staff during the outbreak period was significantly higher than that of the surgical staff during the non-outbreak period (t = 6.432, P <0.001). The depression score of surgical staff during the outbreak period was 7.333 ± 2.508, of which 24 were positive for depression (≥8 points). The depression score of surgical staff during the non-outbreak period was 4.933 ± 2.154, of which 7 were positive for depression. Obviously, the depression score of surgical staff during the outbreak was higher than that of surgical staff during the non-outbreak (t = 4.531, P <0.001). At the same time, the dream anxiety score and SF-36 of the surgical staff during the outbreak were significantly higher than those of the surgical staff during the non-outbreak (t = 17.365, P <0.001; t = 1.974, P <0.001). In addition, the anxiety score, depression score, and dream anxiety score of the surgical staff during the outbreak period were positively correlated (Fig. 1 D, E, F), and the depression score and dream anxiety score of the surgical staff during the outbreak period were strongly positively correlated Sex (Fig. 1A).
Fig. 1

Correlation between anxiety, depression and dream anxiety

Note:Correlation between anxiety and depression in surgical staff during the non-outbreak period (A) (P<0.0001), correlation between anxiety and dream anxiety (B), and correlation between depression and dream anxiety (C). Correlation between anxiety and depression in surgical staff during the outbreak period (D) (P<0.0001), correlation between anxiety and dream anxiety (E) (P<0.0001), and correlation between depression and dream anxiety (F) (P<0.0001). .

Correlation between anxiety, depression and dream anxiety Note:Correlation between anxiety and depression in surgical staff during the non-outbreak period (A) (P<0.0001), correlation between anxiety and dream anxiety (B), and correlation between depression and dream anxiety (C). Correlation between anxiety and depression in surgical staff during the outbreak period (D) (P<0.0001), correlation between anxiety and dream anxiety (E) (P<0.0001), and correlation between depression and dream anxiety (F) (P<0.0001). . The results showed that the degree of anxiety and depression of the surgical staff during the outbreak was significantly higher than that of the surgical staff during the non-outbreak. COVID-19 is an acute respiratory disease. It can spread through a variety of routes, such as close air and close contact, and can cause infections in hospitals. COVID-19 causes many medical personnel to be easily infected in a short time when treating patients. Surgical medical personnel also occupy an important position in this epidemic, there are also many SARS-CoV-2 confirmed cases that require surgical treatment. Surgical patients will not be reduced due to the outbreak of the epidemic. Especially, not all patients undergoing emergency operation and confine operation have been tested for viral nucleic acid, and it is impossible to determine whether the patient has no history of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, during the month of the epidemic outbreak (January 28, 2020 to February 29, 2020), the medical staff faced all patients who must be treated as soon as possible and inevitably need to worry about their own risk of infection. These include surgeons and anesthesiologists, who need to perform intubation and other operations, and they all need to be in close contact with patients at high risk. It is even more common for patients to conceal their exposure to high-risk areas of SARS-CoV-2 in order to receive timely treatment. Therefore, during the outbreak, the surgical medical staff suffered the risk of self-infection, and the huge psychological pressure caused the anxiety and depression. However, mental health problems will affect the working status of surgical medical personnel to a certain extent, and affect the treatment of patients. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the mental health of surgical medical personnel. Studies have shown that acute stress events such as SARS have significant negative psychological effects on medical staff. Surgical medical staff is also one of the forces to resist COVID-19, while preventing and controlling the epidemic, we must not forget the treatment of the remaining patients with severe surgery. In summary, in order to protect the mental health of surgical medical personnel, ensure adequate rest time and must pay attention to as early as possible, and give certain psychological intervention measures.

Authors' contributions

JX and QHX designed the current study. CMW and JW collected data. QHX and JX analyzed the data. QHX wrote the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to publish

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author statement

Manuscript number: PSY_2020_578 Manuscript Title: Psychological status of surgical staff during the COVID-19 outbreak I have made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND I have drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content; AND I have approved the final version to be published; AND I agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved All persons who have made substantial contributions to the work reported in the manuscript, including those who provided editing and writing assistance but who are not authors, are named in the Acknowledgments section of the manuscript and have given their written permission to be named. If the manuscript does not include Acknowledgments, it is because the authors have not received substantial contributions from nonauthors. Attachment: No Author signature: Jian Xu, Qian-hui Xu, Chang-ming Wang, Jun Wang Table 1 . xxx
Table 1

Basic characteristics and Anxiety, Depression, Dream Anxiety Index and SF-36 of surgical staff.

Clinical characteristicsCOVID-19 outbreak period (n = 60)Non-COVID-19 outbreak period (n = 60)tP
Age (years)36.68±9.6735.77±7.060.5930.554
Gender0.4620.438
male22)36.7(28)46.7(
Female38)63.3(32)53.3(
Marital status0.6650.478
married51(85.0)49(81.7)
unmarried9)15.0(11)18.3(
Sleeping time)h(6.28±0.447.21±0.893.1340.012
Anxiety Index7.817±2.5085.283±1.7386.432<0.001
Depression Index7.333±2.5084.933±2.1544.531<0.001
Dream Anxiety Index48.183±13.59215.983±4.64517.365<0.001
SF-36512.56±58.34658.32±61.231.974<0.001

Notes: Chi-squared tests or the two-tailed, paired Student's t-test were used. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Basic characteristics and Anxiety, Depression, Dream Anxiety Index and SF-36 of surgical staff. Notes: Chi-squared tests or the two-tailed, paired Student's t-test were used. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Declaration of Competing Interests

This study did not receive any industrial support. The authors have no competing interests to declare regarding this study.
  58 in total

Review 1.  Psychological sequelae within different populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review of extant evidence.

Authors:  Xin Jie Jordon Tng; Qian Hui Chew; Kang Sim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.331

2.  UVC-PURGE: A Novel Cost-Effective Disinfection Robot for Combating COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Akib Zaman; Mohammad Shahjahan Majib; Shoeb Ahmed Tanjim; Shah Md Ahasan Siddique; Shafayetul Islam; Md Shadman Aadeeb; Nafiz Imtiaz Khan; Riasat Haque; Md Rashid Ul Islam; M Rayhan Ferdous Faisal; Siddharth Malik; Muhammad Nazrul Islam
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.476

3.  Depression and anxiety among Pakistani healthcare workers amid COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Irfan Ullah; Kiran Shafiq Khan; Iftikhar Ali; Arslan Rahat Ullah; Sonia Mukhtar; Renato de Filippis; Najma Iqbal Malik; Mohammadreza Shalbafan; Zair Hassan; Muhammad Sohaib Asghar
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-26

Review 4.  The Wither or Thrive Model of Resilience: an Integrative Framework of Dynamic Vulnerability and Resilience in the Face of Repeated Stressors During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Malvika Godara; Sarita Silveira; Hannah Matthäus; Tania Singer
Journal:  Advers Resil Sci       Date:  2022-07-13

5.  Initial Psychometric Development of the Fear and Anxiety to COVID-19 Scale in Nursing Professionals: An Occupational Health Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Cristina Morgado-Toscano; Regina Allande-Cussó; Javier Fagundo-Rivera; Juan Jesús García-Iglesias; Jose Antonio Climent-Rodríguez; Yolanda Navarro-Abal; Juan Gómez-Salgado
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-10-14

6.  Mental Health in Health Professionals in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Antonia Bendau; Andreas Ströhle; Moritz Bruno Petzold
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 7.  [COVID-19 Pandemic: Stress Experience of Healthcare Workers - A Short Current Review].

Authors:  Jens Bohlken; Friederike Schömig; Matthias R Lemke; Matthias Pumberger; Steffi G Riedel-Heller
Journal:  Psychiatr Prax       Date:  2020-04-27

8.  Early vascular surgery response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Christopher A Latz; Laura T Boitano; C Y Maximilian Png; Adam Tanious; Pavel Kibrik; Mark Conrad; Matthew Eagleton; Anahita Dua
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  A year in review: sleep dysfunction and psychological distress in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sofia Pappa; Nikolaos Sakkas; Elpitha Sakka
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.842

10.  The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on otolaryngologists: Should we be concerned?

Authors:  Mona Mohammedsaleh Ashoor; Noorah Jamal Almulhem; Zaid Abdulrahman AlMubarak; Ahmed Abdulrahman Alrahim; Saad Mohammed Alshammari; Fahad Saleh Alzahrani; Ali Radi Alhayek; Abdullah Alardhi
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.