Literature DB >> 32301749

Analytical performances of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG and antibody kinetics.

Andrea Padoan1,2, Chiara Cosma1, Laura Sciacovelli1, Diego Faggian1, Mario Plebani1,2.   

Abstract

Background Coronavirus disease 2019, abbreviated to COVID-19, represents an emerging health threat worldwide as, after initial reports in China, it has continued to spread rapidly. The clinical spectrum of the disease varies from mild to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Moreover, many patients can be asymptomatic, thus increasing the uncertainty of the diagnostic work-up. Laboratory tests play a pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19, the current gold standard being real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) on respiratory tract specimens. However, the diagnostic accuracy of rRT-PCR depends on many pre-analytical and analytical variables. The measurement of specific COVID-19 antibodies (both IgG and IgM) should serve as an additional, non-invasive tool for disease detection and management. Methods The imprecision of the MAGLUMI™ 2000 Plus 2019-nCov IgM and IgG assays (Snibe, Shenzhen, China) was assessed by adopting the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP15-A3 protocol. Linearity of dilution and recovery was evaluated by means of mixes of high-level pools and low-level pools of serum samples. Immunoglobulin time kinetics were evaluated using a series of serum samples, repeatedly collected from COVID-19-positive patients at different times, from <5 days up to 26-30 days. Results Findings at the analytical validation of the assay carried out according to the CLSI EP15-A3 guideline demonstrated that imprecision and repeatability were acceptable (repeatability was <4% and <6% for IgM and IgG, respectively, whilst intermediate imprecision was <6%). In addition, results of dilution and recovery studies were satisfactory. The kinetics of COVID-19 antibodies confirmed previously reported findings, showing a rapid increase of both IgM and IgG after 6-7 days from the symptom onset. IgG had 100% sensitivity on day 12, whilst 88% was the higher positive rate achieved for IgM after the same time interval. Conclusions The findings of this study demonstrate the validity of the MAGLUMI 2000 Plus CLIA assay for the measurement of specific IgM and IgG in sera of COVID-19 patients, and for obtaining valuable data on the kinetics of both (IgM and IgG) COVID-19 antibodies. These data represent a pre-requisite for the appropriate utilization of specific antibodies for the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID IgG and IgM; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; analytical performances; antibody kinetics; rRT-PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32301749     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  93 in total

1.  Clinical value analysis of IgM and IgG antibodies detected by nucleic acid in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Tao Ding; Nengping Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 2.  Biological characteristics and biomarkers of novel SARS-CoV-2 facilitated rapid development and implementation of diagnostic tools and surveillance measures.

Authors:  Gajanan Sampatrao Ghodake; Surendra Krushna Shinde; Avinash Ashok Kadam; Rijuta Ganesh Saratale; Ganesh Dattatraya Saratale; Asad Syed; Abdallah M Elgorban; Najat Marraiki; Dae-Young Kim
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 10.618

3.  Evaluation of Chilblains as a Manifestation of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Anne Herman; Caroline Peeters; Alexia Verroken; Isabelle Tromme; Dominique Tennstedt; Liliane Marot; Claire Dachelet; Damien Gruson; Cedric Hermans; Marie Baeck
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  SARS-CoV-2 antibody-based SURVEILLANCE: New light in the SHADOW.

Authors:  Mario Plebani
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 8.143

5.  False negative results and tolerance limits of SARS-CoV-2 laboratory tests.

Authors:  Hikmet Can Çubukçu; Abdurrahman Coşkun
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Development of a rapid and sensitive quantum dot nanobead-based double-antigen sandwich lateral flow immunoassay and its clinical performance for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 total antibodies.

Authors:  Yaofeng Zhou; Yuan Chen; Wenjuan Liu; Hao Fang; Xiangmin Li; Li Hou; Yuanjie Liu; Weihua Lai; Xiaolin Huang; Yonghua Xiong
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 7.460

Review 7.  Recent advances in detection technologies for COVID-19.

Authors:  Tingting Han; Hailin Cong; Youqing Shen; Bing Yu
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 6.057

8.  Point-of-Care PCR Assays for COVID-19 Detection.

Authors:  Niharika Gupta; Shine Augustine; Tarun Narayan; Alan O'Riordan; Asmita Das; D Kumar; John H T Luong; Bansi D Malhotra
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-01

9.  Rapid, label-free, and sensitive point-of-care testing of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG using all-fiber Fresnel reflection microfluidic biosensor.

Authors:  Wenjuan Xu; Jiayao Liu; Dan Song; Chunsheng Li; Anna Zhu; Feng Long
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.833

10.  Declining Levels of Neutralizing Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 in Convalescent COVID-19 Patients One Year Post Symptom Onset.

Authors:  Tiandan Xiang; Boyun Liang; Yaohui Fang; Sihong Lu; Sumeng Li; Hua Wang; Huadong Li; Xiaoli Yang; Shu Shen; Bin Zhu; Baoju Wang; Jun Wu; Jia Liu; Mengji Lu; Dongliang Yang; Ulf Dittmer; Mirko Trilling; Fei Deng; Xin Zheng
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.