| Literature DB >> 32299152 |
Chenyu Guan1,2, Daiqiao Ouyang1,2, Yongjie Qiao1,2, Kan Li1,2, Guangsen Zheng1,2, Xiaomei Lao1,2, Sien Zhang1,2, Guiqing Liao1,2, Yujie Liang1,2.
Abstract
CA9 is a member of the carbonic anhydrases' family, that is often expressed in cancer cells under hypoxic condition. However, the role of CA9 in the molecular mechanisms of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) pathogenesis remains unclear. CA9 expression was analysed using the TCGA database, and its influence on survival was performed using Kaplan-Meier, LASSO and COX regression analyses. The correlation between CA9 and immune infiltration was investigated by CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE. Moreover, the relationship between CA9 expression and downstream molecular regulation pathways was analysed by GSEA, GO and WGCNA. CA9 expression correlated with clinical prognosis and tumour grade in TSCC. Moreover, CA9 expression potentially contributes to the regulation of cancer cell differentiation and mediates tumour-associated genes and signalling pathways, including apoptosis, hypoxia, G2M checkpoint, PI3K/AKR/mTOR signalling and TGF-beta signalling pathways. However, the follicular helper T cells, regulatory T cells, immune and stromal scores showed no significance between high and low CA9 expression groups. These findings suggested that CA9 plays a critical role of TSCC prognosis and tumour grade. CA9 expression significantly correlated with the regulation of cell differentiation, various oncogenes and cancer-associated pathways.Entities:
Keywords: CA9; TCGA; bioinformatics; tongue squamous cell carcinoma; tumour grade
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32299152 PMCID: PMC7214172 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Evaluating the prognostic significance of carbonic anhydrases in TSCC. A, Heatmap of carbonic anhydrases expression in TSCC. B, The validation and elucidation of carbonic anhydrases was performed through the LASSO regression model. C, The forest plot exhibited hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) by multivariate Cox regression analysis
Univariate analysis and Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis of carbonic anhydrases in TSCC
| Gene | Univariate analysis | Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HR |
|
| |
| CA9 | 1.386 | <.001 | .002 |
| CA5B | 0.388 | .106 | .009 |
| CA5AP1 | 0.478 | .835 | .056 |
| CA4 | 4.279 | .030 | .061 |
| CA12 | 1.198 | .164 | .181 |
| CA5A | 0.059 | .781 | .371 |
| CA2 | 1.077 | .373 | .384 |
| CA5BP1 | 0.567 | .120 | .400 |
| CA8 | 0.894 | .892 | .432 |
| CA7 | 0.968 | .982 | .565 |
| CA6 | 1.765 | .186 | .567 |
| CA10 | 0.046 | .467 | .583 |
| CA1 | 0.013 | .694 | .617 |
| CA14 | 1.557 | .553 | .631 |
| CA3‐AS1 | 0.793 | .511 | .632 |
| CA3 | 1.011 | .906 | .725 |
| CA11 | 0.901 | .585 | .757 |
| CA13 | 0.967 | .909 | .775 |
| CA15P1 | 0.108 | .366 | .785 |
| CA15P2 | 0.009 | .677 | .864 |
P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
P < .05.
P < .01.
P < .001.
Figure 2Analysis of differentially expressed genes and immune infiltration level with CA9 high and low expression groups in TSCC. A, Heatmap of the analysed differentially expressed genes. B, Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes with CA9 high and low expression groups. C, Go analysis of the differentially expressed genes with CA9 high and low expression groups. D, Analysis of Hallmark gene sets by GSEA. E, Analysis of KEGG by GSEA. F, Violin plot of immune infiltration level between CA9 high and low expression groups. G, Immune scores between CA9 high and low expression groups. H, Stromal scores between CA9 high and low expression groups
Figure 3CA9 clinical characteristics and risk scores in TSCC. A, Scatter plots showing the expression levels of CA9 between normal tissue (blue) and TSCC tumour tissue (red). B, Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis of the role of CA9 in the overall survival of head and neck cancer patients. C, Nomogram for predicting 3‐y or 5‐y survival, in relation to CA 9 expression in TSCC patients
Univariate and multivariate analyses of the clinical characteristics related to the expression level of CA9 in TSCC
| Parameters | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR |
| HR | 95% CI |
| ||
| Group (high vs low) | 0.410 | .006 | 0.403 | 0.212 | 0.766 | .006 |
| Age (≤60 vs >60) | 1.153 | .640 | 1.072 | 0.584 | 1.967 | .823 |
| Gender (female vs male) | 0.802 | .492 | 0.854 | 0.450 | 1.618 | .628 |
| Grade (I + II vs III + IV) | 2.041 | .032 | 2.293 | 1.187 | 4.431 | .014 |
| Stage (I + II vs III + IV) | 2.161 | 0.062 | 2.319 | 1.028 | 5.229 | 0.043 |
P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
P < .05.
P < .01.
Figure 4Grade weighted gene co‐expression network analysis of module eigengenes of grade correlated with CA9 expression in TSCC. A, The clustering dendrograms and the scale‐free topology model of the CA9 high and low expression groups. B, Biological process enrichment of module eigengenes of grade correlated with CA9 expression. C, Cellular component enrichment of module eigengenes of grade correlated with CA9 expression. D, Molecular function of grade module eigengenes correlated with CA9 expression. E, Hub genes protein interaction network of the significant modules for patients’ grade