Literature DB >> 32298717

Acceptability of oral dimethandrolone undecanoate in a 28-day placebo-controlled trial of a hormonal male contraceptive prototype.

Brian T Nguyen1, Maritza T Farrant2, Bradley D Anawalt2, Fiona Yuen3, Arthi Thirumalai2, John K Amory2, Ronald S Swerdloff3, William J Bremner2, Peter Y Liu3, Diana L Blithe4, Stephanie T Page2, Christina Wang3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine men's satisfaction with and acceptability of a once-daily, oral regimen of dimethandrolone undecanoate (DMAU) versus placebo when used for 28 days. STUDY
DESIGN: After a Phase I double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating trial of oral DMAU for 28-days, 57 healthy male volunteers completed a survey assessing their experience and satisfaction with the regimen. In the trial, participants were randomized to receive up to 4 DMAU capsules daily versus placebo and instructed to ingest them within 30 min of consuming a high fat meal. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles were performed, followed by a 6-week recovery phase. Participants were counseled that they could not rely on the drug for contraception.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven participants were offered acceptability surveys (39 DMAU, 18 placebo). Most respondents, 80% (45/56), reported satisfaction with the method; 77% (44/57) would recommend it. 54% (31/57), reported that, if available, they would use the method as their primary contraceptive. More respondents reported satisfaction with active DMAU than placebo (87% vs. 67%; p = 0.05). Most respondents, 91% (52/57), reported no difficulty with having to take up to 4 pills within 30 min of ingesting a high-fat meal.
CONCLUSION: Most participants reported that the study method, daily oral DMAU or placebo, was satisfactory and acceptable. Having to take the drug after a high-fat meal did not detract from acceptability. IMPLICATIONS: Most participants in a 4-week trial of daily DMAU capsules would recommend and use the method. High satisfaction among DMAU and placebo groups affirms acceptability of a daily male contraceptive pill, warranting further study of oral DMAU.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptability; Androgen-Progestin Actions; Dimethandrolone undecanoate; Hormonal male contraception; Male contraception

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32298717      PMCID: PMC7287214          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  19 in total

1.  Potential impact of hormonal male contraception: cross-cultural implications for development of novel preparations.

Authors:  C W Martin; R A Anderson; L Cheng; P C Ho; Z van der Spuy; K B Smith; A F Glasier; D Everington; D T Baird
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  The acceptability of an injectable, once-a-month male contraceptive in China.

Authors:  Liying Zhang; Iqbal H Shah; Yunrong Liu; Kirsten M Vogelsong; Lihong Zhang
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia and oligozoospermia in normal men.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Evidence for the acceptability of an injectable hormonal method for men.

Authors:  K Ringheim
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1995 May-Jun

5.  Would women trust their partners to use a male pill?

Authors:  A F Glasier; R Anakwe; D Everington; C W Martin; Z van der Spuy; L Cheng; P C Ho; R A Anderson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  A lower dosage levonorgestrel and testosterone combination effectively suppresses spermatogenesis and circulating gonadotropin levels with fewer metabolic effects than higher dosage combinations.

Authors:  B D Anawalt; R A Bebb; W J Bremner; A M Matsumoto
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  1999 May-Jun

7.  Long-term effects of dimethandrolone 17β-undecanoate and 11β-methyl-19-nortestosterone 17β-dodecylcarbonate on body composition, bone mineral density, serum gonadotropins, and androgenic/anabolic activity in castrated male rats.

Authors:  Barbara J Attardi; Brett T Marck; Alvin M Matsumoto; Sailaja Koduri; Sheri A Hild
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2010-08-26

8.  Absolute bioavailability of testosterone after oral administration of testosterone-undecanoate and testosterone.

Authors:  U Täuber; K Schröder; B Düsterberg; H Matthes
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1986 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

9.  Effects of 28 Days of Oral Dimethandrolone Undecanoate in Healthy Men: A Prototype Male Pill.

Authors:  Arthi Thirumalai; Jonas Ceponis; John K Amory; Ronald Swerdloff; Vijaya Surampudi; Peter Y Liu; William J Bremner; Eric Harvey; Diana L Blithe; Min S Lee; Laura Hull; Christina Wang; Stephanie T Page
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 10.  Male hormonal contraception: looking back and moving forward.

Authors:  M Y Roth; S T Page; W J Bremner
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.842

View more
  4 in total

1.  Post-abortion contraception, an opportunity for male partners and male contraception.

Authors:  Brian T Nguyen; Tamar L Jacobsohn
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Update on Novel Hormonal and Nonhormonal Male Contraceptive Development.

Authors:  Jill E Long; Min S Lee; Diana L Blithe
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Acceptability of the oral hormonal male contraceptive prototype, 11β-methyl-19-nortestosterone dodecylcarbonate (11β-MNTDC), in a 28-day placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Brian T Nguyen; Fiona Yuen; Maritza Farrant; Arthi Thirumalai; Frances Fernando; John K Amory; Ronald S Swerdloff; Bradley D Anawalt; Diana L Blithe; Jill E Long; Peter Y Liu; Stephanie T Page; Christina Wang
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Contraceptive Technologies: Looking Ahead to New Approaches to Increase Options for Family Planning.

Authors:  Lisa B Haddad; John W Townsend; Regine Sitruk-Ware
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 1.966

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.