Literature DB >> 32298467

The use of UV fluorescent powder for COVID-19 airway management simulation training.

C Gardiner1, J Veall1, S Lockhart2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32298467      PMCID: PMC7262236          DOI: 10.1111/anae.15089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


× No keyword cloud information.
The COVID‐19 pandemic has made it imperative to rapidly implement changes to typical medical practice in order to minimise spread of the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus. Many of these changes are non‐intuitive or differ significantly from normal practice. For this reason, we read with great appreciation the timely article by Fregene et al. 1, which describes translational simulation leading to increased preparedness at their institution. With the recognition that aerosol generating procedures are of particular importance to practice due to their high risk of virus transmission, we offer an additional tool for COVID‐19 airway simulation training that helped consolidate learning and motivate change to practice in hospitals across Vancouver. Here we describe two ways to integrate UV fluorescent powder, as a visual virus surrogate, into scenarios requiring tracheal intubation. Of note, droplet transmission is considered to occur with respiratory droplets which are by definition, > 5 microns, whereas airborne transmission occurs with droplets which are < 5 microns 2. We use Glo GermTM (Marlatek Inc., Brockville, ON, Canada) as the UV fluorescent powder in these simulations which is 5 microns in size 3.

Model 1: aerosolised powder

Remove one of the manikin's lungs and thread a 6.0 mm I.D. tracheal tube filled with 1/8 tsp of Glo Germ into the bronchial lumen, then inflate the cuff. Connect an elbow attachment with a CO2 sampling port to the tracheal tube. Connect an Ambubag to the elbow attachment and a 3 ml syringe filled with 1/16 tsp of Glo Germ to the sampling port. During airway management, squeeze the Ambubag to send plumes of Glo Germ into the airway and surrounding area when there are breaches to optimal management (inadequate neuromuscular blockade, during attempts at bag‐valve‐mask ventilation, failure to inflate tracheal tube cuff adequately, etc.).

Model 2: mixed atomised particles and liquid

Mix Glo Germ into a 250 ml bag of saline to the desired level of UV luminescence. Thread a mucosal anatomising device with extension tubing from the nose through to the oesophagus of the manikin. Fill a 5‐ml syringe with Glo Germ liquid and attach it to the mucosal anatomising device. During airway management, when the practitioner changes from a simple mask to Ambubag, spray Glo Germ liquid out from the nostril. In both models, mix minimal Glo Germ with airway lubricant or petroleum jelly to apply to the manikin lips, tongue, cheeks and the tracheal tube cuffs of any to be used in the scenario. The UV fluorescent powder dispersal apparatus of either model may be concealed from sight under a patient gown. Illuminate the scene and participants’ personal protective equipment (PPE) with black light at the end of the scenario, as well as before and after doffing PPE, in order to view Glo Germ dispersal. Figure 1 shows Glo Germ dispersal after airway management breech using model 1 (left) and model 2 (right), illuminated with black light (please note the nasal mucosal anatomising device visible in model 2).
Figure 1

Glo Germ™ dispersal after airway management breech using model 1 (left) and model 2 (right), illuminated with black light (please note the nasal mucosal anatomising device visible in model 2).

Glo Germ™ dispersal after airway management breech using model 1 (left) and model 2 (right), illuminated with black light (please note the nasal mucosal anatomising device visible in model 2). Before adopting either model it is essential to be clear on the educational objectives of the simulation scenario. The UV light reveal is impactful enough that it will weigh most strongly in participant learning, regardless of the teaching goals during debriefing. Whereas model 1 results in contamination of equipment within 1 m of the manikin, model 2 contaminates more widely. Both offer evidence of direct contamination from contact with the Glo Germ lubricant applied to various surfaces. Model 1 is more representative of aerosolised contamination due to Glo Germ's particle size of 5 microns, whereas the nasal mucosal anatomising device in model 2 creates a mix of 30–100 micron droplets 4. Model 2 introduces the potential for secondary dispersal and contamination with doffing, which is a major source of staff self‐contamination. Mindful extrapolation to clinical practice is required when using either model, given their inherent differences from true virus transmission. When used appropriately and in line with educational objectives, UV fluorescent powder offers a powerful visual tool in simulation training to reinforce, guide and consolidate changes to airway management for suspected and confirmed COVID‐19 patients.
  1 in total

1.  Use of in situ simulation to evaluate the operational readiness of a high-consequence infectious disease intensive care unit.

Authors:  T E Fregene; P Nadarajah; J F Buckley; S Bigham; V Nangalia
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 6.955

  1 in total
  8 in total

1.  A comparison of droplet and contact contamination using 3 simulated barrier techniques for COVID-19 intubation: a quality assurance study.

Authors:  Peter Rose; John Veall; Navraj Chima; Elena Vowels; Shruti Chitnis; Alana Flexman; Raymond Tang
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-08-31

2.  Preventing Contamination During Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Face of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Glo Germ Experience.

Authors:  Amy J Moulthrop; Lavinia M Kolarczyk; Emily G Teeter
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Mobilization of a Simulation Platform to Facilitate a System-wide Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  David J Carlberg; Tiffany M Chan; Diana Ladkany; Jessica Palmer; Kevin Bradshaw
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-06-23

4.  Application of Plastic Sheet Barrier and Video Intubating Stylet to Protect Tracheal Intubators During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Taiwan Experience.

Authors:  Hsiang-Ning Luk; Yao-Lin Yang; Ching-Hsuan Huang; I-Min Su; Phil B Tsai
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Development of a Mannequin for Simulation-Based Trials Involving Respiratory Viral Spread During Respiratory Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Arrest Scenarios.

Authors:  Cindy Luu; Margaux Chan; Leo Langga; Elizabeth Bragg; Alyssa Rake; Caulette Young; Jennifer Lau; Edward Guerrero; Joshua Buan; Todd Chang
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-09

6.  Exploring health service preparation for the COVID-19 crisis utilizing simulation-based activities in a Norwegian hospital: a qualitative case study.

Authors:  Une Elisabeth Stømer; Peter Dieckmann; Thomas Laudal; Kristi Bjørnes Skeie; Sigrun Anna Qvindesland; Hege Langli Ersdal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Aerosol and droplet dispersion during emergency front-of-neck access - A bench-top manikin simulation study.

Authors:  Jiali Kwek; Siying Pang; Sarah H K Chua; Jinbin Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-07-22

8.  Strategies for daily operating room management of ambulatory surgery centers following resolution of the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Franklin Dexter; Mohamed Elhakim; Randy W Loftus; Melinda S Seering; Richard H Epstein
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 9.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.