Literature DB >> 32873584

A comparison of droplet and contact contamination using 3 simulated barrier techniques for COVID-19 intubation: a quality assurance study.

Peter Rose1, John Veall2, Navraj Chima2, Elena Vowels2, Shruti Chitnis2, Alana Flexman2, Raymond Tang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The intubation of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) puts health care workers at risk of infection through aerosol, droplet and contact contamination. We evaluated the risk of droplet and contact contamination for health care workers using 3 intubation barrier techniques as part of a quality assurance study at our institution.
METHODS: This randomized quality assurance study was completed at a tertiary academic hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, on Apr. 4, 2020. Participants in personal protective equipment performed simulated intubations on a manikin with (a) no barrier, (b) a clear plastic sheet covering the manikin and (c) a plexiglass intubation box over the manikin, in random order. Fluorescein was ejected from inside the manikin's mouth to simulate droplet and contact spread during a standard intubation sequence. Two blinded independent assessors evaluated the location and degree of contamination on the intubator and assistant using an ultraviolet light. Contamination severity was rated in a standard fashion (0 = none; 1 = minor; 2 = major). The primary outcome was total contamination score and secondary outcomes were scores between intubator and assistant, anatomic areas contaminated and qualitative feedback on ease of intubation.
RESULTS: Five participants completed this study. Total contamination score was different between the 3 groups for the intubator (p = 0.02) but not the assistant (p = 0.2). For the intubator, the total contamination score was higher when the sheet was used (median 29 [interquartile range (IQR) 25-34]) than when the box was used (median 17 [IQR 15-22]) or when no barrier was used (median 18 [IQR 13-21]). All 5 participants reported challenges during intubation using the sheet.
INTERPRETATION: Use of a plastic sheet while intubating patients with COVID-19 may increase the risk of droplet and contact contamination during intubation and impede intubation. Further study should be undertaken before implementing barrier techniques in practice. Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32873584      PMCID: PMC7641175          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  15 in total

1.  Alternative doffing strategies of personal protective equipment to prevent self-contamination in the health care setting.

Authors:  Kathryn Osei-Bonsu; Nadia Masroor; Kaila Cooper; Christopher Doern; Kimberly K Jefferson; Yvette Major; Savion Adamson; Justin Thomas; Ian Lovern; Heather Albert; Michael P Stevens; Gordon Archer; Gonzalo Bearman; Michelle Doll
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Use of personal protective equipment among health care personnel: Results of clinical observations and simulations.

Authors:  JaHyun Kang; John M O'Donnell; Bonnie Colaianne; Nicholas Bircher; Dianxu Ren; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  The Italian coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak: recommendations from clinical practice.

Authors:  M Sorbello; K El-Boghdadly; I Di Giacinto; R Cataldo; C Esposito; S Falcetta; G Merli; G Cortese; R M Corso; F Bressan; S Pintaudi; R Greif; A Donati; F Petrini
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Double gloves: a randomized trial to evaluate a simple strategy to reduce contamination in the operating room.

Authors:  David J Birnbach; Lisa F Rosen; Maureen Fitzpatrick; Philip Carling; Kristopher L Arheart; L Silvia Munoz-Price
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Protecting Healthcare Workers During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak: Lessons From Taiwan's Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Response.

Authors:  Jonathan Schwartz; Chwan-Chuen King; Muh-Yong Yen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of Anaesthetists the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the Royal College of Anaesthetists.

Authors:  T M Cook; K El-Boghdadly; B McGuire; A F McNarry; A Patel; A Higgs
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Intubation and Ventilation amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: Wuhan's Experience.

Authors:  Lingzhong Meng; Haibo Qiu; Li Wan; Yuhang Ai; Zhanggang Xue; Qulian Guo; Ranjit Deshpande; Lina Zhang; Jie Meng; Chuanyao Tong; Hong Liu; Lize Xiong
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Barrier Enclosure during Endotracheal Intubation.

Authors:  Robert Canelli; Christopher W Connor; Mauricio Gonzalez; Ala Nozari; Rafael Ortega
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Zunyou Wu; Jennifer M McGoogan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover study.

Authors:  J L Begley; K E Lavery; C P Nickson; D J Brewster
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 12.893

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  ORi™: a new indicator of oxygenation.

Authors:  Yusuke Ishida; Toshio Okada; Takayuki Kobayashi; Hiroyuki Uchino
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.078

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.