Literature DB >> 32298218

Potential for developing a SARS-CoV receptor-binding domain (RBD) recombinant protein as a heterologous human vaccine against coronavirus infectious disease (COVID)-19.

Wen-Hsiang Chen1,2, Peter J Hotez1,2,3, Maria Elena Bottazzi1,2,3.   

Abstract

A SARS-CoV receptor-binding domain (RBD) recombinant protein was developed and manufactured under current good manufacturing practices in 2016. The protein, known as RBD219-N1 when formulated on Alhydrogel®, induced high-level neutralizing antibodies and protective immunity with minimal immunopathology in mice after a homologous virus challenge with SARS-CoV (MA15 strain). We examined published evidence in support of whether the SARS-CoV RBD219-N1 could be repurposed as a heterologous vaccine against Coronavirus Infectious Disease (COVID)-19. Our findings include evidence that convalescent serum from SARS-CoV patients can neutralize SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, a review of published studies using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) raised against SARS-CoV RBD and that neutralizes the SARS-CoV virus in vitro finds that some of these mAbs bind to the receptor-binding motif (RBM) within the RBD, while others bind to domains outside this region within RBD. This information is relevant and supports the possibility of developing a heterologous SARS-CoV RBD vaccine against COVID-19, especially due to the finding that the overall high amino acid similarity (82%) between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 spike and RBD domains is not reflected in RBM amino acid similarity (59%). However, the high sequence similarity (94%) in the region outside of RBM offers the potential of conserved neutralizing epitopes between both viruses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Heterologous vaccine; SARS; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus; receptor-binding domain; subunit vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32298218      PMCID: PMC7482854          DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1740560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019, or COVID-19[1], is an emerging disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Similar to SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV), SARS-CoV-2 can cause severe respiratory illness and significant mortality among those over 60 y or with chronic conditions.[2] With an estimated reproductive number (R0) of 2.24–3.58,[3] the outbreak originated from Wuhan, China quickly spread across China and at least 25 other nations.[2] In addition, SARS-CoV-2 may be transmitted from infected individuals without symptoms,[3] which could increase the challenges for controlling the outbreak without the prospect of a vaccine. A SARS-CoV receptor-binding domain (RBD) recombinant protein was developed and manufactured under current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) in 2016.[4-6] The bulk drug substance has been stored frozen (−70°C to −80°C) and is under stability testing since its manufacturing, so far remaining stable. The protein known as RBD219-N1 (Figure 1a) was expressed in yeast (Pichia pastoris X33) and purified to optimize expression yield, antigenicity, and functionality, as well as immunogenicity in mice when formulated on alum.[4,6] Moreover, alum-adjuvanted RBD219-N1 induced protective immunity against homologous virus challenge with SARS-CoV (MA15 lethal strain), with minimal immunopathology, lessening potential safety concerns.[5] The high levels of protein expression in yeast, the relative ease of purification and its stability profile raise the possibility that this vaccine could be produced at a low cost for stockpiling or distribution among at-risk populations. Accordingly, we are therefore investigating whether the SARS-CoV RBD recombinant protein candidate could potentially be repurposed as a heterologous vaccine for SARS-CoV-2.
Figure 1.

(a) Illustration of SARS-CoV RBD subunit S1. (b) Sequence alignment between SARS-CoV RBD219-N1 and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The RBM region is circled in green. An example of a neutralizing conformational epitope consisting S343–367, 373–390 and 411–428 (reported by Bian et al.) is circled in blue, indicating neutralizing epitopes do not have to be within RBM.[7]

(a) Illustration of SARS-CoV RBD subunit S1. (b) Sequence alignment between SARS-CoV RBD219-N1 and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The RBM region is circled in green. An example of a neutralizing conformational epitope consisting S343–367, 373–390 and 411–428 (reported by Bian et al.) is circled in blue, indicating neutralizing epitopes do not have to be within RBM.[7]

SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2

Like the SARS coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 is closely related to bat SARS-like coronavirus.[8] The Receptor Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV RBD219-N1 share substantial amino acid sequence similarity (75% identity, 83% similarity) (Figure 1b) and evidence indicates that both coronaviruses use the human receptor angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) for cell entry.[9,10] Antibodies induced by anti-SARS vaccines can cross-neutralize bat SARS-like coronaviruses (SL-CoVs);[11] most importantly, serum from a convalescent SARS-CoV patient neutralized SARS-CoV-2-driven entry.[10] These findings suggest the possible cross-protection of using SARS-CoV RBD as the antigen against SARS-CoV-2.

Anti-SARS-CoV RBD neutralizing monoclonal antibodies

It is known that the blockage of the receptor-binding motif (RBM) within the RBD and the ACE2 association site, is a major mechanism of SARS-CoV neutralization. However, despite the overall high level of homology between the two SARS-CoV RBDs, it has been noted that the similarity of 70 amino acids in the RBM (S424−494) between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 is only 59%, and thus, the neutralizing antibodies (mAbs) raised from the RBM of SARS-CoV may have limited cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, several groups have shown (typically via a neutralization assay in Vero E6 cells) that neutralizing antibodies recognize epitopes other than in the RBM region. Using RBD proteins expressed in mammalian cells (293 T cells), He et al. reported on 27 anti-SARS-CoV RBD mAbs with 23 of them showing neutralizing activity (Table 1), and of these, some interfered with virus binding to the ACE2 receptor by affecting the binding of the RBM, but many achieved virus neutralization by recognizing epitopes outside of the RBM.[12] In some cases, it is likely that these non-RBM directed mAbs caused conformational changes that indirectly affected RBM binding or through mechanisms as yet undetermined.[13] Among these 23 neutralizing mAbs, 5 mAbs, including 24H8, 19B2, 35B5, 33G4 and 31H12, were used for a binding study on RBD219-N1, with all 5 neutralizing mAbs against both the RBM and non-RBM regions also recognized the RBD219-N1 recombinant protein.[6] He et al. also found neutralizing mAbs against non-RBM domains using a baculovirus expressed RBD,[12] while Bian et al. further identified one conformational neutralizing epitope consisting S343–367, 373–390 and 411–428,[7] which was on the RBD but outside of the RBM. Additionally, CR3022, a potent human neutralizing mAb, which was derived from a single-chain variable antibody fragment (scFv) phage display library was shown to bind to the RBD domain, but outside the RBM region.[14]
Table 1.

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies reported in He et al, 2005[11] were categorized based on its ability to inhibit RBM binding to the ACE2.

Ability to block RBM binding to ACE2Anti SARS-CoV RBD neutralizing mAb ID#Number of antibodies
No9F7, 10E7, 12B11, 18C2, 24H8,26E1, 29G2, 32H5, 20E7, 26A4, 27C1, 31H12, 30E10, 13B613
Partially11E12, 18D9, 19B23
Yes28D6, 30F9, 35B5, 24F4, 33G4, 38D4,6
Not defined26E11
 Total23
Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies reported in He et al, 2005[11] were categorized based on its ability to inhibit RBM binding to the ACE2. An important conclusion of these published studies was that virus neutralization does not depend on interference with the RBM. While the mechanism of action of these mAbs requires additional studies, some appear to bind to sites outside the RBM possibly by causing conformational changes to the RBD, while others still neutralize without directly inhibiting ACE2 binding in vitro. In more recent studies, Tian et al.[15] and Wrapp et al.[16] have used five anti-SARS-CoV RBD neutralizing mAbs to evaluate their cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 RBD (Table 2). Among these five neutralizing mAbs, the four mAbs that bound the epitopes in or close to RBM expectedly only had weak or no binding, while CR3022, which recognized the epitope outside of RBM, showed potent binding. Considering the highly conserved – a similarity of 94% – amino acid sequence of RBD region after excluding the RBM (Figure 1b), the possibility remains that antibodies raised from the epitopes outside of the RBM region may both show cross-reactivity and induce neutralizing antibodies.
Table 2.

Binding study of anti-SARS-CoV RBD neutralizing mAb against the SARS-CoV-2 RBD

Anti SARS-CoV RBD neutralizing mAb ID#Binding to RBMCross-reactivity of mAb to SARS-CoV-2 RBD
CR3022 [14]NoBound potently (Tian et al., 2020)[15]
CR3014 [14,17,18]YesNo binding (Tian et al., 2020)[15]
m396 [19,20]YesWeakly or no binding (Tian et al., 2020;Wrapp et al., 2020)15,16
80R [21]YesNo binding (Wrapp et al., 2020)[16]
S230 [20,22]YesNo binding (Wrapp et al., 2020)[16]
Binding study of anti-SARS-CoV RBD neutralizing mAb against the SARS-CoV-2 RBD

Concluding comments

The yeast-expressed SARS-CoV RBD219-N1 recombinant protein has been manufactured under cGMP and could soon enter clinical testing. Even though blockage of the RBM is a major mechanism of SARS-CoV neutralization, it was proven that neutralizing antibodies can also be raised from epitopes outside of RBM. Indeed, at least one neutralizing mAb that recognizes both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 binds to a domain outside the RBM. Despite the low amino acid similarity of RBM region between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, its high amino acid similarity with the homologous RBD from SARS-CoV-2, and its potential for raising neutralizing antibodies (when formulated on alum), especially against epitopes outside the RBM, offers the possibility that it might partially protect against COVID-19. Therefore, a logical and crucial next step would be that, in parallel to efforts to initiate the development of a homologous SARS-CoV-2 recombinant RBD protein vaccine, we accelerate the evaluation of a heterologous vaccine into safety clinical testing. Clinical data obtained from these studies would greatly assist in the development of a safe, immunogenic and effective vaccine against Coronaviruses.
  21 in total

1.  Antigenic and immunogenic characterization of recombinant baculovirus-expressed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein: implication for vaccine design.

Authors:  Yuxian He; Jingjing Li; Susanne Heck; Sara Lustigman; Shibo Jiang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Cross-neutralization of SARS coronavirus-specific antibodies against bat SARS-like coronaviruses.

Authors:  Lei-Ping Zeng; Xing-Yi Ge; Cheng Peng; Wanbo Tai; Shibo Jiang; Lanying Du; Zheng-Li Shi
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 6.038

3.  Molecular and biological characterization of human monoclonal antibodies binding to the spike and nucleocapsid proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus.

Authors:  Edward N van den Brink; Jan Ter Meulen; Freek Cox; Mandy A C Jongeneelen; Alexandra Thijsse; Mark Throsby; Wilfred E Marissen; Pauline M L Rood; Alexander B H Bakker; Hans R Gelderblom; Byron E Martina; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Wolfgang Preiser; Hans Wilhelm Doerr; John de Kruif; Jaap Goudsmit
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Structural basis for potent cross-neutralizing human monoclonal antibody protection against lethal human and zoonotic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus challenge.

Authors:  Barry Rockx; Davide Corti; Eric Donaldson; Timothy Sheahan; Konrad Stadler; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Ralph Baric
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Potent cross-reactive neutralization of SARS coronavirus isolates by human monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Zhongyu Zhu; Samitabh Chakraborti; Yuxian He; Anjeanette Roberts; Tim Sheahan; Xiaodong Xiao; Lisa E Hensley; Ponraj Prabakaran; Barry Rockx; Igor A Sidorov; Davide Corti; Leatrice Vogel; Yang Feng; Jae-Ouk Kim; Lin-Fa Wang; Ralph Baric; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Kristopher M Curtis; Gary J Nabel; Kanta Subbarao; Shibo Jiang; Dimiter S Dimitrov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

Authors:  Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 176.079

7.  Structural basis of neutralization by a human anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome spike protein antibody, 80R.

Authors:  William C Hwang; Yaqiong Lin; Eugenio Santelli; Jianhua Sui; Lukasz Jaroszewski; Boguslaw Stec; Michael Farzan; Wayne A Marasco; Robert C Liddington
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Structure of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor-binding domain complexed with neutralizing antibody.

Authors:  Ponraj Prabakaran; Jianhua Gan; Yang Feng; Zhongyu Zhu; Vidita Choudhry; Xiaodong Xiao; Xinhua Ji; Dimiter S Dimitrov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Human monoclonal antibody as prophylaxis for SARS coronavirus infection in ferrets.

Authors:  Jan ter Meulen; Alexander B H Bakker; Edward N van den Brink; Gerrit J Weverling; Byron E E Martina; Bart L Haagmans; Thijs Kuiken; John de Kruif; Wolfgang Preiser; Willy Spaan; Hans R Gelderblom; Jaap Goudsmit; Albert D M E Osterhaus
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Conserved amino acids W423 and N424 in receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV are potential targets for therapeutic monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  Chao Bian; Xiuqin Zhang; Xingfeng Cai; Linqi Zhang; Zhiwei Chen; Ye Zha; Ying Xu; Ke Xu; Wei Lu; Linchen Yan; Jianwei Yuan; Jiannan Feng; Pei Hao; Qidi Wang; Guoping Zhao; Gang Liu; Xueliang Zhu; Hao Shen; Bojian Zheng; Beifen Shen; Bing Sun
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.616

View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Biological characteristics and biomarkers of novel SARS-CoV-2 facilitated rapid development and implementation of diagnostic tools and surveillance measures.

Authors:  Gajanan Sampatrao Ghodake; Surendra Krushna Shinde; Avinash Ashok Kadam; Rijuta Ganesh Saratale; Ganesh Dattatraya Saratale; Asad Syed; Abdallah M Elgorban; Najat Marraiki; Dae-Young Kim
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 10.618

2.  Vaccines Targeting Numerous Coronavirus Antigens, Ensuring Broader Global Population Coverage: Multi-epitope and Multi-patch Vaccines.

Authors:  Sukrit Srivastava; Spyros D Chatziefthymiou; Michael Kolbe
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 3.  Antibodies and Vaccines Target RBD of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Long Min; Qiu Sun
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-04-22

Review 4.  Thermostability, Tunability, and Tenacity of RNA as Rubbery Anionic Polymeric Materials in Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine-Specific Cancer Targeting with Undetectable Toxicity.

Authors:  Daniel W Binzel; Xin Li; Nicolas Burns; Eshan Khan; Wen-Jui Lee; Li-Ching Chen; Satheesh Ellipilli; Wayne Miles; Yuan Soon Ho; Peixuan Guo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 5.  Advances in Pathogenesis, Progression, Potential Targets and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies in SARS-CoV-2-Induced COVID-19.

Authors:  Hong Zhou; Wei-Jian Ni; Wei Huang; Zhen Wang; Ming Cai; Yan-Cai Sun
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 6.  Drug targets for COVID-19 therapeutics: Ongoing global efforts.

Authors:  Ambrish Saxena
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Developing a low-cost and accessible COVID-19 vaccine for global health.

Authors:  Peter J Hotez; Maria Elena Bottazzi
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-07-29

Review 8.  A contemporary review on pathogenesis and immunity of COVID-19 infection.

Authors:  Rasoul Mirzaei; Sajad Karampoor; Mohammad Sholeh; Pouya Moradi; Reza Ranjbar; Faezeh Ghasemi
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Purification and characterization of the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Yunxia He; Jinming Qi; Lucheng Xiao; Lijuan Shen; Weili Yu; Tao Hu
Journal:  Eng Life Sci       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.678

10.  Tracking Changes in SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Evidence that D614G Increases Infectivity of the COVID-19 Virus.

Authors:  Bette Korber; Will M Fischer; Sandrasegaram Gnanakaran; Hyejin Yoon; James Theiler; Werner Abfalterer; Nick Hengartner; Elena E Giorgi; Tanmoy Bhattacharya; Brian Foley; Kathryn M Hastie; Matthew D Parker; David G Partridge; Cariad M Evans; Timothy M Freeman; Thushan I de Silva; Charlene McDanal; Lautaro G Perez; Haili Tang; Alex Moon-Walker; Sean P Whelan; Celia C LaBranche; Erica O Saphire; David C Montefiori
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 66.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.