| Literature DB >> 32297657 |
Debra P C Peters1,2, Gregory S Okin2,3, Jeffrey E Herrick1,2, Heather M Savoy1,2, John P Anderson2,4, Stacey L P Scroggs2,5, Junzhe Zhang2,3.
Abstract
Alternative states maintained by feedbacks are notoriously difficult, if not impossible, to reverse. Although positive interactions that modify soil conditions may have the greatest potential to alter self-reinforcing feedbacks, the conditions leading to these state change reversals have not been resolved. In a 9-yr study, we modified horizontal connectivity of resources by wind or water on different geomorphic surfaces in an attempt to alter plant-soil feedbacks and shift woody-plant-dominated states back toward perennial grass dominance. Modifying connectivity resulted in an increase in litter cover regardless of the vector of transport (wind, water) followed by an increase in perennial grass cover 2 yr later. Modifying connectivity was most effective on sandy soils where wind is the dominant vector, and least effective on gravelly soils on stable surfaces with low sediment movement by water. We found that grass cover was related to precipitation in the first 5 yr of our study, and plant-soil feedbacks developed following 6 yr of modified connectivity to overwhelm effects of precipitation on sandy, wind-blown soils. These feedbacks persisted through time under variable annual rainfall. On alluvial soils, either plant-soil feedbacks developed after 7 yr that were not persistent (active soils) or did not develop (stable soils). This novel approach has application to drylands globally where desertified lands have suffered losses in ecosystem services, and to other ecosystems where connectivity-mediated feedbacks modified at fine scales can be expected to impact plant recovery and state change reversals at larger scales, in particular for wind-impacted sites.Entities:
Keywords: aeolian processes; alternative states; cusp-catastrophe model; desertification; ecohydrology; long-term studies; regime shifts; remediation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32297657 PMCID: PMC7569510 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecology ISSN: 0012-9658 Impact factor: 5.499
Fig. 1Cusp‐catastrophe theoretical diagram. Transitions from a stable grassland to a feedback‐stabilized woody plant‐dominated system can occur if the strength of feedbacks changes (A → C), such as when increasing bare gap size increases connectivity‐related feedbacks caused by wind and water erosion. A woody‐plant‐dominated state (point B), can be reversed if the exogenous factors change to favor grass recovery (B → A). A woody‐plant‐dominated system stabilized by feedbacks (point C) may revert to a perennial grassland (panel a, point D), but the exogenous forces be much more favorable for a woody‐plant‐to‐grassland transition (C → E→D) than they were for the grassland‐to‐woody plant transition (panel a, D → F→C). Because states are enforced by feedbacks, moving a system into the equilibrium regime potentially entails the suppression of positive feedbacks that stabilizes the woody‐plant‐dominated state (C → B→A).
Fig. 2Conceptual diagram of modifying connectivity to overcome patch‐scale resource redistribution by wind or water. (a) Area defined by ConMod or control structure. (b) Experimental design showing individual ConMods (50 cm wide × 20 cm tall) spatially distributed within an ~8 × 8 m treatment patch at 50–100 cm distance apart.
Fig. 3Precipitation through time at each of three locations. Annual precipitation (cm) from nearby weather station in three locations: aeolian, alluvial‐active, and alluvial‐stable. Horizontal lines indicate location means over the study period, and the long‐term mean (1915–2019) from the USDA ARS headquarters. w = wet year; a = average year; d = dry year.
Fig. 4Vegetation response and material accumulation through time at each of three locations. (a) Mean herbaceous and litter cover (percentage of area) from overhead imagery from 2008‐2016 with inserts indicating the percentage of herbaceous cover that is perennial grass and (b) mean vertical accumulation (mm) of soil and litter since 2008 from lateral imagery in 2012, 2015, and 2016. All means are from n = 4 plots per treatment. Error bars denote standard error. Asterisks denote significant differences between the treatment means at P < 0.05.
Fig. 5New recruits in ConMod/control structures at each of three locations. (a) Example unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery from Summer 2017 over one patch with ConMods from each location, and (b) the mean proportion (%) of ConMod/control structures with new plants (grass or shrub) within the total number of ConMod/control structures per treatment (n = 4). Error bars denote standard error. Asterisks denote significant differences between the treatment means at P < 0.05.
Fig. 6Grass cover as a function of multi‐scale drivers. (a) Percentage of cover attributed to grasses in ConMods as a function of precipitation (cm) in the previous six months from nearby weather station and (b) percentage of cover attributed to grasses in ConMods as a function of precipitation (PPT, cm) in the previous six months and relative net sediment flux (SEDflux, g·cm−2·d−1). Linear regression models per treatment and location are indicated. Only significant regression models shown (P < 0.05). Years are indicated in red for the ConMod values at the aeolian and alluvial‐active locations.