Literature DB >> 31433468

Surgical Smoke Exposure in Operating Room Personnel: A Review.

Ice V Limchantra1, Yuman Fong2, Kurt A Melstrom2.   

Abstract

Importance: Smoke generated during surgical procedures has long been thought to be hazardous to hospital personnel; however, the degree of danger has yet to be determined. Observations: The dangers of surgical smoke are associated with the composition of the plume. Small-particulate matter is found in the smoke that is easily inhaled. Particulates deposit in the lungs, circulatory system, and other organs, which may cause numerous health problems. The smoke also contains many gaseous compounds known to cause cancer. The type of tissue and the form of cautery have been shown to alter the composition of the surgical smoke. Well-cited articles have asserted that daily inhaled surgical smoke could be equivalent to smoking dozens of cigarettes. Unsafe levels of cancer-causing compounds have been found in the smoke. However, there is no firm evidence that operating room personnel show increased cancer rates compared with the general population. Data implicating other forms of passively inhaled smoke, such as fumes associated with cooking and wood burning, are likely comparable to the smoke issued during surgical procedures. Most operating rooms do not require smoke evacuation, and the elimination techniques are variable. Most systems rely on dispersion and, possibly, mechanical evacuation and filtration. Newer electric filters show promise but require more development. Conclusions and Relevance: Surgical smoke is dangerous, but the severity of the risk has yet to be determined. Therefore, no safe level is known at this point. Efforts should be made to reduce and possibly eliminate smoke from the operating room. Research into cost-effective forms of smoke evacuation is necessary. Studies of respiratory and cancer sequelae of exposure to operating room smoke in personnel who have had long-term exposure to surgical smoke is also needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31433468     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  17 in total

1.  Current Evidence for Minimally Invasive Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Risk Mitigation Strategies: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Keegan Guidolin; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Abdu Sharkawy; Antonino Spinelli; Fayez A Quereshy; Allan Okrainec
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The management of surgical patients in the emergency setting during COVID-19 pandemic: the WSES position paper.

Authors:  Belinda De Simone; Elie Chouillard; Massimo Sartelli; Walter L Biffl; Salomone Di Saverio; Ernest E Moore; Yoram Kluger; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Luca Ansaloni; Federico Coccolini; Ari Leppänemi; Andrew B Peitzmann; Leonardo Pagani; Gustavo P Fraga; Ciro Paolillo; Edoardo Picetti; Massimo Valentino; Emmanouil Pikoulis; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider.

Authors:  Barry N Swerdlow
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Surgically generated aerosol and mitigation strategies: combined use of irrigation, respirators and suction massively reduces particulate matter aerosol.

Authors:  Moritz W J Schramm; Asim J Sheikh; Rebecca Chave-Cox; James McQuaid; Rachel C W Whitty; Evgenia Ilyinskaya
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Risk of Virus Contamination Through Surgical Smoke During Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature on a Neglected Issue Revived in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era.

Authors:  Nicola Pavan; Alessandro Crestani; Alberto Abrate; Cosimo De Nunzio; Francesco Esperto; Gianluca Giannarini; Antonio Galfano; Andrea Gregori; Giovanni Liguori; Riccardo Bartoletti; Francesco Porpiglia; Alchiede Simonato; Carlo Trombetta; Andrea Tubaro; Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2020-06-05

6.  Bioaerosols during transanal minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey Dalli; Niall Hardy; M Faraz Khan; Ronan A Cahill
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Letter to the Editor Regarding: "Coronavirus Neurosurgical/Head and Neck Drape to Prevent Aerosolization of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): The Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health Solution".

Authors:  Adesh Shrivastava; Rakesh Mishra; Manas Prakash; Sumit Raj; Pradeep Chouksey; Amit Agrawal
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  COVID-19 and dermatologic surgery: Hazards of surgical plume.

Authors:  Firas Al-Niaimi; Faisal R Ali
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.858

9.  A novel aerosolisation mitigation device for endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Jaime Viera-Artiles; David Mato; José J Valdiande; David Lobo; Juan Pedraja; José M López-Higuera; Javier Ospina
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Electrocautery, Diathermy, and Surgical Energy Devices: Are Surgical Teams at Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Kimberley Zakka; Simon Erridge; Swathikan Chidambaram; Michael Kynoch; James Kinross; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.