BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intraspecific variation in foundation species of forest ecosystems can shape community and ecosystem properties, particularly when that variation has a genetic basis. Traits mediating interactions with other species are predicted by simple allocation models to follow ontogenetic patterns that are rarely studied in trees. The aim of this research was to identify the roles of genotype, ontogeny and genotypic trade-offs shaping growth, defence and reproduction in aspen. METHODS: We established a common garden replicating >500 aspen genets in Wisconsin, USA. Trees were measured through the juvenile period into the onset of reproduction, for growth, defence chemistry (phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins), nitrogen, extrafloral nectaries, leaf morphology (specific leaf area), flower production and foliar herbivory and disease. We also assayed the TOZ19 sex marker and heterozygosity at ten microsatellite loci. KEY RESULTS: We found high levels of genotypic variation for all traits, and high heritabilities for both the traits and their ontogenetic trajectories. Ontogeny strongly shaped intraspecific variation, and trade-offs among growth, defence and reproduction supported some predictions while contradicting others. Both direct resistance (chemical defence) and indirect defence (extrafloral nectaries) declined during the juvenile stage, prior to the onset of reproduction. Reproduction was higher in trees that were larger, male and had higher individual heterozygosity. Growth was diminished by genotypic allocation to both direct and indirect defence as well as to reproduction, but we found no evidence of trade-offs between defence and reproduction. CONCLUSIONS: Key traits affecting the ecological communities of aspen have high levels of genotypic variation and heritability, strong patterns of ontogeny and clear trade-offs among growth, defence and reproduction. The architecture of aspen's community genetics - its ontogeny, trade-offs and especially its great variability - is shaped by both its broad range and the diverse community of associates, and in turn further fosters that diversity.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intraspecific variation in foundation species of forest ecosystems can shape community and ecosystem properties, particularly when that variation has a genetic basis. Traits mediating interactions with other species are predicted by simple allocation models to follow ontogenetic patterns that are rarely studied in trees. The aim of this research was to identify the roles of genotype, ontogeny and genotypic trade-offs shaping growth, defence and reproduction in aspen. METHODS: We established a common garden replicating >500 aspen genets in Wisconsin, USA. Trees were measured through the juvenile period into the onset of reproduction, for growth, defence chemistry (phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins), nitrogen, extrafloral nectaries, leaf morphology (specific leaf area), flower production and foliar herbivory and disease. We also assayed the TOZ19 sex marker and heterozygosity at ten microsatellite loci. KEY RESULTS: We found high levels of genotypic variation for all traits, and high heritabilities for both the traits and their ontogenetic trajectories. Ontogeny strongly shaped intraspecific variation, and trade-offs among growth, defence and reproduction supported some predictions while contradicting others. Both direct resistance (chemical defence) and indirect defence (extrafloral nectaries) declined during the juvenile stage, prior to the onset of reproduction. Reproduction was higher in trees that were larger, male and had higher individual heterozygosity. Growth was diminished by genotypic allocation to both direct and indirect defence as well as to reproduction, but we found no evidence of trade-offs between defence and reproduction. CONCLUSIONS: Key traits affecting the ecological communities of aspen have high levels of genotypic variation and heritability, strong patterns of ontogeny and clear trade-offs among growth, defence and reproduction. The architecture of aspen's community genetics - its ontogeny, trade-offs and especially its great variability - is shaped by both its broad range and the diverse community of associates, and in turn further fosters that diversity.
Authors: Thomas G Whitham; Joseph K Bailey; Jennifer A Schweitzer; Stephen M Shuster; Randy K Bangert; Carri J LeRoy; Eric V Lonsdorf; Gery J Allan; Stephen P DiFazio; Brad M Potts; Dylan G Fischer; Catherine A Gehring; Richard L Lindroth; Jane C Marks; Stephen C Hart; Gina M Wimp; Stuart C Wooley Journal: Nat Rev Genet Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 53.242
Authors: Joseph K Bailey; Andrew P Hendry; Michael T Kinnison; David M Post; Eric P Palkovacs; Fanie Pelletier; Luke J Harmon; Jennifer A Schweitzer Journal: New Phytol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Vicki H G Decker; Franziska Bandau; Michael J Gundale; Christopher T Cole; Benedicte R Albrectsen Journal: Tree Physiol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: Simone Des Roches; David M Post; Nash E Turley; Joseph K Bailey; Andrew P Hendry; Michael T Kinnison; Jennifer A Schweitzer; Eric P Palkovacs Journal: Nat Ecol Evol Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 15.460
Authors: Harley Gordon; Christin Fellenberg; Nathalie D Lackus; Finn Archinuk; Amanda Sproule; Yoko Nakamura; Tobias G K Llner; Jonathan Gershenzon; David P Overy; C Peter Constabel Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2022-07-30 Impact factor: 12.085