Literature DB >> 32294667

Translating transmissibility measures into recommendations for coronavirus prevention.

Fredi Alexander Diaz-Quijano1,2, Alfonso Javier Rodriguez-Morales3,4, Eliseu Alves Waldman1.   

Abstract

The rapid increase in clinical cases of the new coronavirus disease, COVID-19, suggests high transmissibility. However, the estimates of the basic reproductive number reported in the literature vary widely. Considering this, we drew the function of contact-rate reduction required to control the transmission from both detectable and undetectable sources. Based on this, we offer a set of recommendations for symptomatic and asymptomatic populations during the current pandemic. Understanding the dynamics of transmission is essential to support government decisions and improve the community's adherence to preventive measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32294667      PMCID: PMC7135119          DOI: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Saude Publica        ISSN: 0034-8910            Impact factor:   2.106


INTRODUCTION

The rapid increase in clinical cases of the new coronavirus disease, COVID-19, suggests that its transmissibility is high. Several studies indicated that the most probable basic reproductive number (R0) is between two and four for the coronavirus (meaning that each infectious individual may directly generate two to four others)[1]. However, some estimates suggested R0 higher than four with confidence intervals that reach values close to eight[2,7]. A reproductive number higher than one implies a progressive increase in cases, which translates into epidemics. Therefore, the reduction in this value must guide preventive strategies towards transmission control. In this study, we applied some simple calculations to translate the transmissibility measures into goals for contact rate reduction to support preventive recommendations during the coronavirus pandemic.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The R0 results from the product of three factors, such as R0 = dpc; where d is the duration of infectiousness (the period when a case can be a source of transmission), p is the probability of transmission by contact, and c is the contact rate[8]. The duration of infectiousness and the transmission probability by contact are practically inherent to the pathology and, therefore, difficult to modify. However, the contact rate is more feasible to control[9]. A theoretically effective strategy would be to eliminate any kind of contact between people, which is impractical. Therefore, a reasonable goal is to reduce contacts to the point that the reproductive number is lower than one. If we consider a R0 of eight, it would be necessary to minimize the contact rate for each infectious case by about . As it is difficult to test all the suspected patients, a sensible recommendation during the epidemic is to apply this goal to all people with respiratory symptoms, which means domestic confinement as long as they do not need specialized care. Asymptomatic people must also be considered because they represent the majority of infections. Recent studies suggested that about 86% of infections can be undocumented. Although the transmission probability from them appears to be 45% lower than from documented cases, undocumented infections are the source of 79% of clinical cases[10]. Given the limitations of both logistics and resources to carry out mass testing, in epidemic situations, everyone must be considered a potential carrier of the infection. Thus, a reasonable goal for asymptomatic people is to reduce the contact rate by more than . These estimates were based on extrapolations from different studies[2,7,10], for which we assumed the worst-case scenarios. Considering this, we represented the relationship between the baseline R0 of identifiable cases and the minimum necessary reduction in their contact rate to decrease that reproductive number to less than one (solid line in the figure). Additionally, we represented the minimum contact-rate reduction that should be concomitantly adopted by the undetectable infection cases to achieve the same goal (dotted line). According to these functions, even in a more optimistic scenario, for example, with a R0 of 4, contact rate should be reduced by at least 75% and 55% for symptomatic and asymptomatic people, respectively (Figure).
Figure

The minimum contact-rate reduction required according to the basic reproductive number (R0).

DISCUSSION

Although it is challenging to quantify how many contacts people usually have, the estimates presented help to understand the need for physical isolation, even among asymptomatic people. The minimum contact-rate reduction refers to that necessary only to decelerate the increasing transmission trend. Consequently, to achieve effective control, reduction must far exceed the minimum recommended and involve the entire community at risk. The virus is transmitted by aerosols that could remain suspended in the air for many minutes after coughing or sneezing[11]. Moreover, it can remain viable for a few days on multiple surfaces. Therefore, proper cleaning of shared spaces and personal hygiene are critical. During the epidemic, even asymptomatic people should avoid crowding and reduce all activities that imply proximity to others, including public transportation, as well as social, cultural, and academic events. Whenever possible, work and study activities should be carried out virtually, and commercial activities and travel should be reduced to what is strictly essential, such as the purchase of food or medicines. Cases with mild respiratory symptoms should be treated at home with hydration and paracetamol when needed. Visits to health centers should only be made when justified by the presence of risk factors (underlying severe disease) or warning signs (such as breathing difficulties or cognitive impairment). Older patients are especially susceptible to complications[12]. However, to reduce transmission, people of all ages must be committed to prevention. Thus, in the absence of vaccines or other preventive strategies, reducing the contact rate will be the only strategy to slow the progression of this pandemic. If these measures are adequately applied, the number of new cases is expected to decrease. It is difficult to predict for how long these preventive measures must be maintained. Nevertheless, the earlier and more rigorously they are incorporated, the faster the epidemiological conditions will be reversed and our regular routines resumed.
  11 in total

1.  Serial interval in determining the estimation of reproduction number of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the early outbreak.

Authors:  Shi Zhao; Peihua Cao; Daozhou Gao; Zian Zhuang; Yongli Cai; Jinjun Ran; Marc K C Chong; Kai Wang; Yijun Lou; Weiming Wang; Lin Yang; Daihai He; Maggie H Wang
Journal:  J Travel Med       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 8.490

Review 2.  A Review of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Tanu Singhal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Reporting, Epidemic Growth, and Reproduction Numbers for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Epidemic.

Authors:  Ashleigh R Tuite; David N Fisman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1.

Authors:  Neeltje van Doremalen; Trenton Bushmaker; Dylan H Morris; Myndi G Holbrook; Amandine Gamble; Brandi N Williamson; Azaibi Tamin; Jennifer L Harcourt; Natalie J Thornburg; Susan I Gerber; James O Lloyd-Smith; Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Preliminary estimation of the basic reproduction number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China, from 2019 to 2020: A data-driven analysis in the early phase of the outbreak.

Authors:  Shi Zhao; Qianyin Lin; Jinjun Ran; Salihu S Musa; Guangpu Yang; Weiming Wang; Yijun Lou; Daozhou Gao; Lin Yang; Daihai He; Maggie H Wang
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Prediction of the Epidemic Peak of Coronavirus Disease in Japan, 2020.

Authors:  Toshikazu Kuniya
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2).

Authors:  Ruiyun Li; Sen Pei; Bin Chen; Yimeng Song; Tao Zhang; Wan Yang; Jeffrey Shaman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Unique epidemiological and clinical features of the emerging 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) implicate special control measures.

Authors:  Yixuan Wang; Yuyi Wang; Yan Chen; Qingsong Qin
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 20.693

9.  Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts.

Authors:  Joel Hellewell; Sam Abbott; Amy Gimma; Nikos I Bosse; Christopher I Jarvis; Timothy W Russell; James D Munday; Adam J Kucharski; W John Edmunds; Sebastian Funk; Rosalind M Eggo
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 26.763

10.  Transmission dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak and effectiveness of government interventions: A data-driven analysis.

Authors:  Yaqing Fang; Yiting Nie; Marshare Penny
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 20.693

View more
  9 in total

1.  Health system collapse 45 days after the detection of COVID-19 in Ceará, Northeast Brazil: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Rocha Queiros Lemos; Sarah Mendes D'Angelo; Luis Arthur Brasil Gadelha Farias; Magda Moura Almeida; Ricristhi Gonçalves Gomes; Geovana Praça Pinto; Josafa Nascimento Cavalcante Filho; Levi Ximenes Feijão; Ana Rita Paulo Cardoso; Thaisy Brasil Ricarte Lima; Pâmela Maria Costa Linhares; Liana Perdigão Mello; Tania Mara Coelho; Luciano Pamplona de Góes Cavalcanti
Journal:  Rev Soc Bras Med Trop       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 1.581

2.  Phylodynamic analysis in the understanding of the current COVID-19 pandemic and its utility in vaccine and antiviral design and assessment.

Authors:  Jaime A Cardona-Ospina; Diana M Rojas-Gallardo; Sandra C Garzón-Castaño; Erika V Jiménez-Posada; Alfonso J Rodríguez-Morales
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Could thermodynamics and heat and mass transfer research produce a fundamental step advance toward and significant reduction of SARS-COV-2 spread?

Authors:  Michele Trancossi; Consuelo Carli; Giuseppe Cannistraro; Jose Pascoa; Shivesh Sharma
Journal:  Int J Heat Mass Transf       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.431

4.  Socio-demographic predictors of adherence to 2019 coronavirus prescribed recommendations and lockdown psychological impacts: Perspectives of Nigerian social media users.

Authors:  Obasanjo Afolabi Bolarinwa; Olalekan Olagunju; Tesleem Babalola; Balsam Qubais Saeed
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2020-11-25

Review 5.  SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 and advances in developing potential therapeutics and vaccines to counter this emerging pandemic.

Authors:  Ali A Rabaan; Shamsah H Al-Ahmed; Ranjit Sah; Ruchi Tiwari; Mohd Iqbal Yatoo; Shailesh Kumar Patel; Mamta Pathak; Yashpal Singh Malik; Kuldeep Dhama; Karam Pal Singh; D Katterine Bonilla-Aldana; Shafiul Haque; Dayron F Martinez-Pulgarin; Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales; Hakan Leblebicioglu
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Deep impact of COVID-19 in the healthcare of Latin America: the case of Brazil.

Authors:  Sergio Cimerman; Alberto Chebabo; Clovis Arns da Cunha; Alfonso J Rodríguez-Morales
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 1.949

7.  Contributions of Latin American researchers in the understanding of the novel coronavirus outbreak: a literature review.

Authors:  Karen Y Fiesco-Sepúlveda; Luis Miguel Serrano-Bermúdez
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Is it time to talk about the end of social distancing? A joinpoint analysis of COVID-19 time series in Brazilian capitals.

Authors:  Raphael Mendonça Guimarães; Mônica de Avelar Figueiredo Mafra Magalhães; Diego Ricardo Xavier; Raphael de Freitas Saldanha; Rafael de Castro Catão
Journal:  Rev Soc Bras Med Trop       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 1.581

9.  Brazilian Portuguese versions and cross-cultural adaptation of two instruments to assess knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding the COVID-19 pandemic in the Brazilian population.

Authors:  Andréa Cristina Meneghini; Wanderson Roberto da Silva; Edson Zangiacomi Martinez; Miriane Lucindo Zucoloto
Journal:  Trends Psychiatry Psychother       Date:  2021-04-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.