| Literature DB >> 32293262 |
Bashar M Thejer1,2, Partho P Adhikary1,3, Sarah L Teakel1, Johnny Fang1, Paul A Weston4,5, Saliya Gurusinghe4, Ayad G Anwer6,7, Martin Gosnell6,8, Jalal A Jazayeri1, Marina Ludescher9, Lesley-Ann Gray10, Michael Pawlak11, Robyn H Wallace1, Sameer D Pant12, Marie Wong13, Tamas Fischer14, Elizabeth J New15, Tanja N Fehm9, Hans Neubauer9, Ewa M Goldys6,7, Jane C Quinn4,16, Leslie A Weston4,5, Michael A Cahill17,18.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) is often elevated in cancers, and exists in alternative states of phosphorylation. A motif centered on PGRMC1 Y180 was evolutionarily acquired concurrently with the embryological gastrulation organizer that orchestrates vertebrate tissue differentiation.Entities:
Keywords: Cell death; Cytochrome P450; Embryology; Epigenetics; Genomic sequence; Hyperspectral autofluorescence; Metabolism; Organizer; Steroid biology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32293262 PMCID: PMC7160964 DOI: 10.1186/s12860-020-00268-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Mol Cell Biol ISSN: 2661-8850
Fig. 1Hyperspectral autofluorescence reveals metabolic differences between cells expressing different mutant PGRMC1-HA proteins. a Principal component analysis (PCA) followed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) reveal hyperspectral autofluorescence parameters that significantly discriminate between cell types. The panel provides a three dimensional depiction of the three most significant canonical variables revealed by PCA and LDA as described [44] that differ according to PGRMC1-HA phosphorylation status. The table provides p values from Kolmogorov-Smirnov test pairwise discrimination analysis. b Mean cellular intensity of hyperspectral autofluorescence channel 3 [375 nm(Ex), 450 nm(Em)], which corresponds primarily to flavin emission, is significantly affected by PGRMC1-HA phosphorylation status. Boxplots were generated in SPSS. The table shows Kruskal-Wallis test p values for the pair-wise condition comparisons performed on primary emission data
Fig. 2PGRMC1 phosphorylation status does not affect P4-dependent resistance to doxorubicin toxicity or resistance to AG-205-induced cell death. a P4 reduces cell proliferation of cells expressing all PGRMC1-HA proteins. The panel shows boxplots of viable cells for n = 6 replicates. The viability of cells pretreated with P4 (dark boxes) or DMSO vehicle control (light boxes) after 23 h were allowed to grow a further 24 h and the level of MTT formazan was quantified as a proxy for viable cell numbers. “% cells after 48 hr” is presented relative to the signal obtained after adherence for 3 h. No significant differences were observed between non-P4 treated cell pairings, except MP v. TM (p = 0.021, 2 way ANOVA). Pair wise comparisons of P4-treated MP vs any of P4-treated WT, DM or TM, or of +/−P4 treatment for WT, DM and TM, were significantly different at the p < 0.00001 level (2 way ANOVA). MP cells +/− P4 were not different (p = 0.55, two way ANOVA). Considering only P4-treated cells, MP differed in P4 response from all other cell types (p < 1 × 10–10), and WT differed marginally from TM (p = 0.034) by one way ANOVA and post-hoc Bonferroni. b P4-protection of MP cells from doxorubicin-induced cell death is facilitated by over-expression of PGRMC1-HA proteins (WT, DM & TM). Cells were grown as in (a), except at t0 doxorubicin (Dox) was added at the indicated concentrations, followed by 24 h incubation. Because of altered cell proliferation during pretreatment with P4 (a), all signals at t0 were expressed as a percentage of the averaged control sample without Dox at t0 to assess the effects of P4. Data points represent the averages ± s.d. of n = 6 replicates. c Boxplots of area under the curve (AUC) results for all data points with dox addition from (b). Two way ANOVA dox treatments were statistically significant (F = 1292.237, df = 1, df2 = 40, p < 1 = e-8), with Partial Eta Squared indicating 97% effect size in the data. Considering pairwise comparisons of cell classes, DM v. TM (p = 0.014) and WT v. DM (p = 0.05) were significantly different. Pairwise comparison between the AUC levels for +/− P4 for each cell class yielded no difference for MP, but p < 1 × 10–8 for other cell types, +/− P4. One way ANOVA post-hoc Bonferroni pairwise comparisons for -P4 cells revealed that samples within dotted boxes did not differ significantly, whereas all pairwise p values were less than those indicated for comparisons between boxes
Fig. 3NpFR1 reveals differences in cytoplasmic redox status. a NpFR1 flow cytometry results. Scatter plots to the left depict green fluorescence on the x axis, and side scatter on the y axis. In the right panels the y axis represents cell number. The numbers at the upper left of each right panel are the fraction of the population in the respective left hand low fluorescent peak. Vertical arrows show the boundary between cell populations, and the inset numbers in the left of each panel represent the percentage of cells in the less oxidized left hand cell population. The vertical dotted reference line represents the 200 fluorescence intensity units, and the open arrow highlights TM fluorescence. b Boxplots showing mean and sample distribution for % cells in the less oxidized population of replicates of (a). Sample size is n = 3, being one each of independent cell lines 1–3 for WT, DM and TM, and triplicates of the MP cell line. The table shows ANOVA post-hoc Dunnet’s T3 p values for the indicated pairwise comparisons. c Boxplot of median fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the oxidized cell populations from (a). The horizontal dotted reference line and open arrow are identical to (A). The table shows ANOVA post-hoc Bonferroni p values for the indicated pairwise comparisons
Fig. 4Pathways enrichment suggests altered cell cycle control proteins. a Abundances of proteins detected as significantly differentially abundant in indicated Pathways Commons pathways by enrichment analysis (Accompanying paper [10]) at the adjP < 5% significance level. (b, c, e-g) Average reverse phase protein array (RPPA) normalized fluorescent intensity (NFI) from the indicated antibodies (see methods) is plotted from 6 replicate measurements. NFI is normalized to protein content. Significance levels are * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Conventions follow those of the accompanying paper [10]. d The ratio of average NFI of the anti-pRB antibody to that of the RB antibody
Fig. 5PGRMC1 phosphorylation status affects DNA mutation rate. a Western blot of cells following thirty passages showing expression of HA-tag. Beta actin was used as a control. b Unique mutations per cell line relative to human reference genome and other genomes in the analysis. Mutations/MB are plotted for 23 chromosomes excluding Y. The box shows p values for Kruskal-Wallis (K-W) post-hoc pairwise comparisons
Fig. 6PGRMC1 phosphorylation is associated with NNMT regulation. a Quantification of NNMT mRNA levels in the four cell types by RT-PCR. Quantification cycle (Cq) results were quantified using the 2ΔΔCq method using beta actin as an internal control. ANOVA post-hoc Tukey’s HSD p < 0.01 (**) or p < 0.001 (***). b Model of the NNMT and 1-methylnicotinamide pathway. Nicotinamide is produced from NAD by NAD-dependent deacetylases (e.g. Sirtuins), PARPS or CD38 [51]. NNMT transfers a methyl group of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to nicotinamide to produce 1-methylnicotinamide (1-MNA), producing S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH). This reaction is in competition with methylation reactions including DNA and histone methylation by SAM [52]. 1-MNA can feed back to stabilize sirtuin 1 [53]
Fig. 7PGRMC1 phosphorylation mutants elicit distinct patterns of genomic methylation. a Hierarchical clustering of methylation data from all cell lines sampled in triplicate. Clustering was applied using 520,031 probes with a coefficient of variation > 0.10. Height is calculated using the UPGMA method in the Lumi package and equates to the average distance between two members of two groups. b Volcano plots of the WT/MP, DM/WT and TM/DM comparisons. The log2 fold change (FC) (x axis) is plotted relative to the log10 p-value (y axis) to visualize the magnitude of the most significant features. Probes with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 and absolute log FC > 1 are plotted in green. Probes with an absolute logFC > 1 that were not significant are plotted in orange. Probes with a logFC < 1 that were significant at adjusted p-value < 0.05 are plotted in blue. Black probes were not significant. c Significant probes in each differential methylation comparison were extracted and the fraction of hypermethylated or hypomethylated probes per chromosome calculated. Methylation levels are higher in TM cells across all chromosomes