| Literature DB >> 32292385 |
Han Zhang1, Yi Peng1, Chunliu Li1, Hong Lan1, Guoqiang Xing2, Zhu Chen1, Bo Zhang1.
Abstract
Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is common among elderly people. So far, effective treatment that can stabilize or reverse the cognitive decline associated with MCI is lacking. Recent studies suggest that playing mahjong may improve attention and memory in elderly people. However, its effect on executive function remains unknown.Entities:
Keywords: TBI; activities of daily living (ADL); elderly; executive function; mahjong; mild cognitive impairment
Year: 2020 PMID: 32292385 PMCID: PMC7120035 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Flowchart of selection of subjects.
Demographics of the participants (N = 56).
| Gender, (women %) | 78.6% | 67.9% | 73.2% | 0.375 |
| Age, year (mean ± s.d) | 74.4 ± 3.9 | 74.2 ± 4.8 | 74.3 ± 4.3 | 0.879 |
| Education, year | 5.6 ± 3.7 | 5.9 ± 4.2 | 5.7 ± 3.9 | 0.814 |
| GDS (mean ± s.d) | 3 ± 1.56 | 2.86 ± 1.7 | 2.93 ± 1.64 | 0.748 |
| CDR (mean ± s.d) | 0.88 ± 0.59 | 0.84 ± 0.62 | 0.86 ± 0.6 | 0.826 |
GDS-15, Geriatric Depression Scale; CDR, The Clinical Dementia Rating.
Changes in MoCA-B, STT-B, and FAQ scores (mean ± s.d) after 6 and 12 weeks of mahjong intervention.
| Mahjong | 21.11 ± 2.22 | 21.3 ± 1.9 | 22.8 ± 1.7 | −1.000/0.326 | −6.971/0.001 | −6.162/0.001 |
| Control | 22.18 ± 2.39 | 22.1 ± 2.3 | 22.0 ± 1.9 | 0.493/0.626 | 0.895/0.379 | 0.593/0.558 |
| t/ | −1.74/ 0.09 | −1.47/0.15 | 1.63/0.11 | |||
| Mahjong | 573.1 ± 113.8 | 555.1 ± 115.0 | 535.7 ± 111.7 | 8.88/ <0.001 | 8.59/0.001 | 5.79/ 0.001 |
| Control | 559.3 ± 95.9 | 561.4 ± 102.0 | 565.5 ± 93.0 | −0.28/0.783 | −1.71/0.66 | −0.45/0.098 |
| t/ | 0.49/ 0.62 | −0.22/0.83 | −1.084/0.283 | |||
| Mahjong | 17.89 ± 4.64 | 16.9 ± 4.5 | 15.6 ± 4.8 | 5.50/ <0.001 | 5.44/ <0.001 | 2.86/ <0.01 |
| Control | 19.36 ± 3.81 | 19.5 ± 3.3 | 19.9 ± 3.6 | −0.87/0.39 | −1.89/0.07 | −1.8/0.083 |
| t/ | −1.291/ 0.20 | −2.61/0.012 | −3.74/0.00 | |||
P < 0.05, difference between mahjong and control groups or between different times after mahjong intervention within each group;
P < 0.001, difference between mahjong and control groups or between different times after mahjong intervention within each group; base, baseline; STT-B, the Shape Trail Test-B; FAQ, Functional Activities Questionnaire; MoCA-B, Montreal Cognitive Assessment—Beijing.
Figure 2Changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment–Beijing (MoCA-B), the Shape Trail Test-B (STT-B), and Functional Activities Questionnaire-21 (FAQ21) among the studied groups. A significant effect of time is observed on the FAQ21 between the two groups after 6 and 12 weeks, while no significant changes were observed in MoCA-B and STT-B. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001 significant between groups at point of assessment.
Correlations between FAQ, MoCA-B, and SST-B before and after 6 and 12 weeks of mahjong playing of all participants (N = 56).
| FAQ: baseline | 1 | ||||||||
| FAQ: 6 weeks | 0.956 | 1 | |||||||
| FAQ: 12 weeks | 0.872 | 0.923 | 1 | ||||||
| MoCA-B: baseline | −0.583 | −0.480 | −0.444 | 1 | |||||
| MoCA-B: 6 weeks | −0.563 | −0.465 | −0.456 | 0.931 | 1 | ||||
| MoCA-B: 12 weeks | −0.495 | −0.490 | −0.569 | 0.766 | 0.759 | 1 | |||
| STT-B: baseline | 0.681 | 0.603 | 0.566 | −0.494 | −0.483 | −0.362 | 1 | ||
| STT-B: 6 weeks | 0.703 | 0.653 | 0.615 | −0.471 | −0.444 | −0.364 | 0.956 | 1 | |
| STT-B: 12 weeks | 0.720 | 0.676 | 0.671 | −0.436 | −0.424 | −0.388 | 0.957 | 0.937 | 1 |
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two tailed).
STT-B, the Shape Trail Test-B; FAQ, Functional Activities Questionnaire; MoCA-B, Montreal Cognitive Assessment—Beijingß.