Literature DB >> 32292198

Report of the 2018-2019 Strategic Engagement Standing Committee.

Diane B Ginsburg1, Anandi V Law2, Henry J Mann3, Laura Palombi4, W Thomas Smith5, Hoai-An Truong6, Lucio R Volino7, Jeffrey O Ekoma8.   

Abstract

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Strategic engagement is critical to the success of colleges and schools of pharmacy in expanding pharmacy and public health practice, meeting programmatic needs, and fulfilling institutional missions. The AACP 2019-2020 Strategic Engagement Committee was charged with exploring faculty leadership and development as they relate to strategic engagement, considering challenges and barriers to faculty participation and identifying successes in faculty engagement and opportunities for professional development. The committee reviewed literature and examples regarding strategic engagement across academic pharmacy, with strategic engagement understood as being part of the service mission of academic institutions. The committee found faculty service is often not rewarded or recognized equally to efforts in research and education, including in promotion and tenure. The perceived low value often accorded to strategic engagement efforts, coupled with lack of time and low priority for the work, are barriers to faculty participation in strategic engagement. Service missions thrive when supported by institutional culture, faculty and alumni role models and administration priorities. The committee also found that there is no defined path to leadership in most national organizations, a limited number of leadership positions and a lack of awareness regarding these positions. However, strategic engagement with organizations can open doors and increase visibility for faculty, leading to enhanced opportunities and improved scholarship. Engagement efforts can be particularly successful when aligned with faculty interests and school and departmental priorities. Based on the committee's work, the following recommendations are provided to AACP for consideration.Recommendation #1 - AACP should create a pathway or exemplar stories of members who have become leaders within the Academy including institutional and volunteer leadership roles.Recommendation #2 - AACP should provide an organizational chart to outline the reporting structures, as well as the policy development process to help members understand how AACP works and points of entry for involvement.Recommendation #3 - AACP should develop an initiative to "groom" faculty for leadership roles including providing tools/training programs for emerging leaders within the Academy.Recommendation #4 - AACP should consider creating a community for targeted groups of faculty, eg, tenured/tenure-track and non-tenure track to address leadership development and engagement based on member interest.Recommendation #5 - AACP should establish a "service mentors" program to match current and past leaders with members interested in enhancing their involvement in the association.
© 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Strategic engagement; faculty member; leadership; professional development; promotion; service; tenure

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32292198      PMCID: PMC7055409          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  11 in total

1.  ACCP white paper: Essential components of a faculty development program for pharmacy practice faculty.

Authors:  Eric G Boyce; Jill S Burkiewicz; Mark R Haase; Eric J MacLaughlin; Alissa R Segal; Eunice P Chung; Lingtak-Neander Chan; Raylene M Rospond; Joseph A Barone; Stephen W Durst; Barbara G Wells
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.705

2.  Faculty awards at US colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Authors:  Michelle M Kalis; Harold L Kirschenbaum
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Competencies for student leadership development in doctor of pharmacy curricula to assist curriculum committees and leadership instructors.

Authors:  Kristin K Janke; Andrew P Traynor; Cynthia J Boyle
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Preparation of faculty members and students to be citizen leaders and pharmacy advocates.

Authors:  Leigh Ann Ross; Kristin K Janke; Cynthia J Boyle; Gerald Gianutsos; Cameron C Lindsey; Leticia R Moczygemba; Karen Whalen
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Building a sustainable system of leadership development for pharmacy: report of the 2008-09 Argus Commission.

Authors:  Robert A Buzz Kerr; Diane E Beck; Jason Doss; JoLaine R Draugalis; Elaine Huang; Adrianne Irwin; Ashish Patel; Cynthia L Raehl; Brent Reed; Marilyn K Speedie; Lucinda L Maine; Jennifer Athay
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Considerations for embracing and expanding community engaged scholarship in academic pharmacy: Report of the 2013-2014 research and graduate affairs committee.

Authors:  Lauren S Bloodworth; Seena L Haines; Kevin R Kearney; Earlene E Lipowski; Todd D Sorensen; Dennis F Thompson; Yuen-Sum Vincent Lau
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  P&T and Me.

Authors:  Daniel R Kennedy; Diane M Calinski
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Utilization of external reviews by colleges of pharmacy during the promotion and tenure process for pharmacy practice faculty.

Authors:  Abigail M Yancey; Matthew Pitlick; Jamie L Woodyard
Journal:  Curr Pharm Teach Learn       Date:  2017-02-17

9.  Use of a Modified Delphi Process to Define the Leadership Characteristics Expected of Pharmacy Faculty Members.

Authors:  Andrew P Traynor; Laura Borgelt; Tobias E Rodriguez; Leigh Ann Ross; Terrence L Schwinghammer
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Faculty turnover within academic pharmacy departments.

Authors:  Orly Carter; Surakit Nathisuwan; Gregory J Stoddard; Mark A Munger
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.