Literature DB >> 32291130

Robotic inguinal hernia repair: Is it a new era in the management of inguinal hernia?

Eli Kakiashvili1, Maxim Bez2, Ibrahim Abu Shakra3, Samer Ganam4, Amitai Bickel5, Fahed Merei4, Assi Drobot4, Grigori Bogouslavski4, Walid Kassis4, Kamal Khatib4, Mahran Badran4, Yoram Kluger6, Ronit Almog7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared outcomes of elective inguinal hernia repair performed at one institution by three approaches: robotic-assistance, laparoscopic, and open.
METHODS: Characteristics of the patients, the hernia and the procedures performed during 2014-2016 were accessed from patient electronic medical files of 137 elective inguinal hernia repairs. 24 surgeries were robotic-assisted, 16 laparoscopic and 97 open repairs.
RESULTS: Distributions of age, sex and BMI did not differ between the groups. Bilateral repair was more common in the robotic (70.8%) than the laparoscopic (50.0%) and open groups (12.4%) (p < 0.001). Direct hernias were more common in the open (45.4%) than the robotic (20.8%) and laparoscopic (12.5%) groups (p < 0.001). Only 3 hernias were inguinoscrotal, all in the robotic group. The median operation times were 44.0, 79.0 and 92.5 min for the open, laparoscopic and robotic methods, respectively (p < 0.001). Among the unilateral repairs, the median operative times were the same for the robotic and laparoscopic procedures, 73 min, and less for the open procedures, 40 min. The proportion of patients hospitalized for 2-3 days was higher for open repair (13.4% vs. 6.2% and 0% for laparoscopic and robotic), but this difference was not statistically significant. The median maximal postoperative pain according to a 0-10-point visual analogue score was 5.0, 2.0 and 0 for open, laparoscopic and robotic procedures, respectively (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This report demonstrated the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32291130     DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  6 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is primarily performed by specialized surgeons: a scoping review.

Authors:  Danni Lip Hansen; Anders Gram-Hanssen; Siv Fonnes; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 2.  Spin is present in the majority of articles evaluating robot-assisted groin hernia repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danni Lip Hansen; Siv Fonnes; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Current status and future perspectives of robotic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Takuya Saito; Yasuyuki Fukami; Shintaro Kurahashi; Kohei Yasui; Tairin Uchino; Tatsuki Matsumura; Takaaki Osawa; Shunichiro Komatsu; Kenitiro Kaneko; Tsuyoshi Sano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.540

4.  Trends and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair in the veterans affairs system.

Authors:  T J Holleran; M A Napolitano; A D Sparks; J E Duncan; M Garrett; F J Brody
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 5.  Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leonardo Solaini; Davide Cavaliere; Andrea Avanzolini; Giuseppe Rocco; Giorgio Ercolani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-10-05

6.  One surgeon's experience with r-TAPP: a retrospective analysis of 150 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia cases.

Authors:  Jorge L Florin; Valeria Bianchi; Daniel D Wiggan
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-01-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.