Literature DB >> 32290748

Lupeol alleviates coxsackievirus B3-induced viral myocarditis in mice via downregulating toll-like receptor 4.

Ming Xu1, Xiaoyong Li1, Laichun Song, Chao Tao, Jihui Fang, Liang Tao.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lupeol; coxsackievirus B3; inflammation; myocarditis; toll-like receptor 4

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32290748      PMCID: PMC7158257          DOI: 10.1177/0300060520910908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Viral myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the myocardium, which can cause heart failure in severe cases.[1] It is well known that coxsackie virus B3 (CVB3) is the predominant cause of viral myocarditis, and the pathogen has been shown to be the most common cause of heart failure in young adults.[2,3] Viral myocarditis murine models established by Coxsackie virus B3 (CVB3) have been widely studied.[4,5] The pathogenesis of viral myocarditis is complex and some researchers have proposed that excessive innate immune response-induced inflammation is the major mechanism.[6] Toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor κB (TLR4/NF-κB) signal pathway is closely related to the inflammatory response.[7,8] and several investigators have suggested that there is a positive correlation between TLR4 activation and viral myocarditis. For example, TLR4 was reported to be overexpressed in CVB3 induced viral myocarditis,[9] whereas TLR4 silence was shown to ameliorate viral myocarditis in the CVB3 infected mouse model.[10] Another study showed that viral myocarditis could be exacerbated by enhancing the activation of TLR4.[11] Therefore, inhibiting TLR4 activation may be a promising target for alleviating inflammation and myocardial damage in viral myocarditis. Lupeol, is a pentacyclic triterpenoid found in a variety of edible vegetables, fruits and other plants. [12] It has been suggested to have beneficial pharmacological activities including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer effects.[12,13] Interestingly, lupeol was observed to inhibit TLR4/MyD88 (myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88) pathway in D-galactosamine and lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatic failure.[14] In addition, lupeol has been shown to have cardioprotective effects.[15,16] However, the effect of lupeol in viral myocarditis is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this present study was to investigate the effect of lupeol on the standard mouse model of CVB3 induced viral myocarditis.

Materials and methods

Animals

Specific pathogen free six-week-old BALB/C mice (male, 14–16 g) were purchased from Hubei Experimental animal research centre (Wuhan, Hubei, China). Mice were housed under constant conditions and had free access to food and water during the experimental period. All animal procedures were performed according to the NIH guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital.

Establishment of the viral myocarditis mouse model

In total, 180 mice were used in the study and separated into six groups: normal mice treated with the same volume of Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (DNEM group, n = 20) CVB3-induced myocarditis (CVB3 group, n = 40) CVB3-induced myocarditis treated with 50 mg/kg lupeol (St. Louis, MO, USA) by intraperitoneal injection (EXP-L group, n = 40) CVB3-induced myocarditis mice treated with 100 mg/kg lupeol by intraperitoneal injection. (EXP-H group, n = 40). [14] CVB3-induced myocarditis mice treated with small interfering RNA (siRNA)-TLR4 (CVB3-siRNA group, n = 20) CVB3-induced myocarditis mice treated with siRNA-TLR4 and 100 mg/kg lupeol (St. Louis, MO, USA) by intraperitoneal injection (siRNA + EXP-H group, n = 20) The CVB3-induced myocarditis mouse models were established by using intraperitoneal injections of 102 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose) CVB3 on Day 0.[10] After 24 h, all mice received intraperitoneal injections every 24 h for 21 days. The mice in the DMEM and CVB3 groups received normal saline (NS), and the mice in the EXP-L and EXP-H groups received lupeol. The mice were monitored and survival noted every two days until they were sacrificed at 21 days.

Detection of cardiac function index

Heart rate (HR) and left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP) were measured via a Power Lab recording instrument (AD Instruments, Castle Hill, Australia). The left ventricle end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were detected by transthoracic echocardiographic using an Agilent Sonos 5500 ultrasound machine (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Mass, USA).

Histopathology

Heart tissues from the mice were harvested and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 h. Thereafter, the specimens were embedded in paraffin, cut into 4 μm sections and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The sections were examined by the same investigator under an optical microscope (OLYMPUS, Japan). Foci of mononuclear infiltration and myocardial necrosis were quantified from 5 high-power fields per section and each specimen was graded as follows: 0: no inflammation or injury; 1: <5% involvement; 2: 5% – 25% involvement; 3: 25% – 75% involvement; 4: >75% involvement.

Virus titre assay

For the virus titre assay, 50 mg of myocardial tissue was placed into 500 ul of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to form an homogenate. The supernatant was serial diluted 10-fold using DMEM and HeLa cells were infected with the supernatant on a 96-well culture plate. Cultured HeLa cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 96 hours. Tissue culture infective dose at 50% (TCID50) was calculated as previously described.[17] The result was expressed as –log10TCID50.

Cytokines and biomarkers

Levels of muscle haemoglobin (Mb), MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB), cardiac troponin I (cTn I), serum tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and serum interleukin (IL)-β, were measured using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The immunohistochemistry for interleukin (IL)-6 was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions for SP immunohistochemistry kits (I003-2, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). Positive cells were detected as brown staining and specimens were analysed using a microscope (OLYMPUS, Japan).

RNA extraction and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from tissues using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) and 2 μg total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNAs via the Prime Script TM RT Master Mix kit (Takara Bio, Kyoto, Japan). Fast Real-time PCR 7300 System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) was used to amplify the cDNA through the SYBR Green (Takara) detection method. The mRNA expression of TLR4 and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) transcripts were normalized to the corresponding β-actin expression using the 2–ΔΔCt method. The specific primers sequences are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.

Specific primers sequences for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

GeneForward primer sequenceReverse primer sequence
β-actin5′-TCACCGAGCGCGGCT-3′5′-TAATGTCACGCACGATTTCCC-3′
COX25′-CCTCTGCGATGCTCTTCC-3′5′-TCACACTTATACTGGTCAAATCC-3′
TLR45′-TGATTGTTGTGGTGTCCCA-3′5’- TGTCCTCCCACTCCAGGTAA-3′

TLR4, toll like receptor 4; COX2, cyclooxygenase-2.

Specific primers sequences for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). TLR4, toll like receptor 4; COX2, cyclooxygenase-2.

Western-blot analysis

Protein was extracted using a total protein extraction kit (W034, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) and quantified using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay. Thereafter, 40 μg of protein was resolved on gel for separation using SDS-PAGE loading buffer. The samples were subsequently transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore Millex, USA) that was blocked and washed The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (i.e., toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, MyD88, phosphorylated NF-κB P65 [P-NF-κb-P65] and NF-κB P65 (all purchased from Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 4°C overnight. The following day, antibodies were washed and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Abcam) for 1.5 h at room temperature. Finally, the immunoreactive bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) and detected using a ChemiDoc XRS imaging system. Β-actin was used as control. To investigate the function of TLR4 in CVB3 caused viral myocardial injury, small interfering RNA (siRNA) of TLR4 was used to block TLR4 expression.

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using Graphpad Prism, version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) and a P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Differences between groups were determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test for comparison.

Results

By comparison with mice treated with DMEM, mice that received the CVB3 virus had reduced HR, LVSP and LVEF and an elevated LVEDP (Table 2). Interestingly, mice with the CVB3 virus who received lupeol treatment (i.e., EXP-L and EXP-H groups) were significantly less affected than the non-treated CVB3 group.
Table 2.

Haemodynamic and cardiac function parameters in the coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) mouse myocarditis model.


GROUPS
ParametersDMEM (n = 20)CVB3 (n = 40)EXP-L (n = 40)EXP-H (n = 40)
Heart rate, bpm473 ± 14337 ± 12**389 ± 16*,#421 ± 13*,#
LVEDP, mm Hg3.6 ± 0.812.3 ± 1.0**6.0 ± 0.5*,#4.7 ± 0.4*,#
LVSP, mm Hg155 ± 14102 ± 8**125 ± 6*,#146 ± 13*,#
LVEF, %45 ± 330 ± 4**35 ± 4*,#39 ± 4*,#

Values are shown as mean ± SD.DMEM, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium; EXP-L, CVB3 + 50 mg/kg lupeol by intraperitoneal injection; EXP-H, CVB3 + 100 mg/kg lupeol by intraperitoneal injection; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVSP, left ventricular systolic pressure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

* P < 0.05 compared with DMEM group, **P < 0.01 compared with DMEM group, #P < 0.05 compared with CVB3 group.

Haemodynamic and cardiac function parameters in the coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) mouse myocarditis model. Values are shown as mean ± SD.DMEM, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium; EXP-L, CVB3 + 50 mg/kg lupeol by intraperitoneal injection; EXP-H, CVB3 + 100 mg/kg lupeol by intraperitoneal injection; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVSP, left ventricular systolic pressure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction. * P < 0.05 compared with DMEM group, **P < 0.01 compared with DMEM group, #P < 0.05 compared with CVB3 group. Heart tissues from the CVB3 group showed the most serious myocardial damage compared with the other three groups as evidenced by the irregularly arranged myocardial cells (Figure 1a). All CVB3-infected mice showed lesions of mononuclear cellular infiltration and necrosis. However, the two groups treated with lupeol showed less myocardial damage than the non-treated CVB3 group. All mice in the DMEM group survived until the end of the experiment (Figure 1b). By contrast, survival rates in the non-treated CVB3 group were significantly decreased (P < 0.01) but survival rates in the lupeol groups were markedly elevated from the CVB3 level (P < 0.01). By comparison with the non-treated CVB3 group, the two lupeol groups had significantly smaller myocarditis scores as assessed from histological analysis (Figure 1c).
Figure 1.

Effects of lupeol on myocardial histopathology and survival rates. (a) Cardiac injury as demonstrated by haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (magnification 400×). (b) Survival rate of the four groups of mice. (c) Myocarditis scores (mean ± SD) of the four groups of mice. Foci of mononuclear infiltration and myocardial necrosis were quantified from 5 high-power fields per section and each specimen was graded as follows: 0: no inflammation or injury; 1: <5% involvement; 2: 5% – 25% involvement; 3: 25% – 75% involvement; 4: >75% involvement. DMEM (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium) treated mice (n = 20); CVB3 (coxsackie virus B3) infected mice (n = 40); EXP-L mice (CVB3 + 50 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]); EXP-H mice (CVB3 + 100 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]).

**P < 0.01 compared with DMEM group, ##P < 0.01 compared with CVB3 group.

Effects of lupeol on myocardial histopathology and survival rates. (a) Cardiac injury as demonstrated by haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (magnification 400×). (b) Survival rate of the four groups of mice. (c) Myocarditis scores (mean ± SD) of the four groups of mice. Foci of mononuclear infiltration and myocardial necrosis were quantified from 5 high-power fields per section and each specimen was graded as follows: 0: no inflammation or injury; 1: <5% involvement; 2: 5% – 25% involvement; 3: 25% – 75% involvement; 4: >75% involvement. DMEM (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium) treated mice (n = 20); CVB3 (coxsackie virus B3) infected mice (n = 40); EXP-L mice (CVB3 + 50 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]); EXP-H mice (CVB3 + 100 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]). **P < 0.01 compared with DMEM group, ##P < 0.01 compared with CVB3 group. Virus titres in each group were expressed as –log10TCID50. The viral titre of CVB3 in the heart tissues was significantly reduced in lupeol groups compared with the non-treated CVB3 group (Figure 2a). In addition, the levels of myocardial damage markers (i.e., cTn I, Mb and CK-MB) were significantly elevated in the non-treated CVB3 group (P < 0.01). By comparison with the non-treated CVB3 group, 50 mg/kg (EXP-L) and 100 mg/kg lupeol (EXP-H) significantly reduced the levels of the three markers (P < 0.01) (Figure 2b, 2c and 2d).
Figure 2.

Effect of lupeol on virus titres and myocardial damage markers. (a) Virus titres; (b) cardiac troponin I (cTn I) levels; (c) muscle haemoglobin (Mb) levels; (d) MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB) levels. Values are shown as mean ± SD. DMEM treated mice (n = 20); CVB3 (coxsackie virus B3) infected mice (n = 40); EXP-L mice (CVB3 + 50 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]); EXP-H mice (CVB3 + 100 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]). **P < 0.01 compared with DMEM group, ##P < 0.01 compared with CVB3 group.

TCID, tissue culture infective dose.

Effect of lupeol on virus titres and myocardial damage markers. (a) Virus titres; (b) cardiac troponin I (cTn I) levels; (c) muscle haemoglobin (Mb) levels; (d) MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB) levels. Values are shown as mean ± SD. DMEM treated mice (n = 20); CVB3 (coxsackie virus B3) infected mice (n = 40); EXP-L mice (CVB3 + 50 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]); EXP-H mice (CVB3 + 100 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]). **P < 0.01 compared with DMEM group, ##P < 0.01 compared with CVB3 group. TCID, tissue culture infective dose. In contrast with the DMEM group, the levels of pro-inflammation cytokines (i.e., IL-1β, TNF-α and COX2) were significantly increased in the non-treated CVB3 group (P < 0.01) (Figure 3a and 3b). As expected, 50 mg/kg (EXP-L) and 100 mg/kg lupeol (EXP-H) significantly reduced the levels of these three cytokines compared with the non-treated CVB3 group (P < 0.01). Interestingly, the levels of IL-1β, TNF-α and COX2 in the CVB3-siRNA, siRNA+EXP-H and EXP-H groups were similar.
Figure 3.

Effect of lupeol on pro-inflammation cytokines. (a) Levels of interleukin (IL)-β and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) were detected by commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) kits. Values are shown as mean ± SD. (b) Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) was determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Values are shown as mean ± SD. (c) Expression of interleukin (IL)-6 detected by immunohistochemical staining. (d) Percentage of IL-6 positive cells shown by immunohistochemical staining. Values are shown as mean ± SD. DMEM treated mice (n = 20); CVB3 (coxsackie virus B3) infected mice (n = 40); EXP-L mice (CVB3 + 50 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]); EXP-H mice (CVB3 + 100 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]); CVB3-siRNA mice (CVB3 + small interfering RNA (siRNA)- toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), [n = 20]); siRNA + EXP-H mice (CVB3 + siRNA-TLR4 + 100 mg/kg lupeol [n = 20]); **P < 0.01 compared with DMEM group, ##P < 0.01 compared with CVB3 group.

Effect of lupeol on pro-inflammation cytokines. (a) Levels of interleukin (IL)-β and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) were detected by commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) kits. Values are shown as mean ± SD. (b) Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) was determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Values are shown as mean ± SD. (c) Expression of interleukin (IL)-6 detected by immunohistochemical staining. (d) Percentage of IL-6 positive cells shown by immunohistochemical staining. Values are shown as mean ± SD. DMEM treated mice (n = 20); CVB3 (coxsackie virus B3) infected mice (n = 40); EXP-L mice (CVB3 + 50 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]); EXP-H mice (CVB3 + 100 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]); CVB3-siRNA mice (CVB3 + small interfering RNA (siRNA)- toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), [n = 20]); siRNA + EXP-H mice (CVB3 + siRNA-TLR4 + 100 mg/kg lupeol [n = 20]); **P < 0.01 compared with DMEM group, ##P < 0.01 compared with CVB3 group. Using immunohistochemical staining, IL-6 was shown to be upregulated in the non-treated CVB3 group but significantly downregulated in the 50 mg/kg (EXP-L) and 100 mg/kg lupeol (EXP-H) groups (P < 0.01) (Figure 3c and 3d). The results following gene silencing of TLR4 by siRNA were similar to those in the EXP-H group. The protein expressions of TLR4, MyD88, NF-κB P65 and p-NF-κB P65 were shown by western blotting (Figure 4a). The mRNA level of TLR4 was significantly elevated in the non-treated CVB3 group and by comparison with this group, mRNA levels were reduced in the EXP-L and EXP-H groups (P < 0.01; Figure 4b). Similarly, protein levels of TLR4, MyD88 and phosphorylated NF-κB P65(P-NF-κb-P65) were significantly upregulated in non-treated CVB3 group and by comparison with this group the levels were downregulated in EXP-L and EXP-H groups (P < 0.01; Figure 4c, 4d and 4e).
Figure 4.

Effect of lupeol on the expression of toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, MyD88, phosphorylated NF-κB P65 [P-NF-κb-P65] and NF-κB P65. (a) The protein expressions of TLR4, MyD88, NF-κB P65and p-NF-κB P65 determined by western blotting. (b) mRNA levels of TLR4 determined by the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Values are shown as mean ± SD. (c–e) Quantitative analysis of the expression of TLR4, MyD88, NF-κB P65and p-NF-κB P65. Values are shown as mean ± SD. DMEM treated mice (n = 20); CVB3 (coxsackie virus B3) infected mice (n = 40); EXP-L mice (CVB3 + 50 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]); EXP-H mice (CVB3 + 100 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]). **P < 0.01 compared with DMEM group, ##P < 0.01 compared with CVB3 group.

Effect of lupeol on the expression of toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, MyD88, phosphorylated NF-κB P65 [P-NF-κb-P65] and NF-κB P65. (a) The protein expressions of TLR4, MyD88, NF-κB P65and p-NF-κB P65 determined by western blotting. (b) mRNA levels of TLR4 determined by the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Values are shown as mean ± SD. (c–e) Quantitative analysis of the expression of TLR4, MyD88, NF-κB P65and p-NF-κB P65. Values are shown as mean ± SD. DMEM treated mice (n = 20); CVB3 (coxsackie virus B3) infected mice (n = 40); EXP-L mice (CVB3 + 50 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]); EXP-H mice (CVB3 + 100 mg/kg lupeol [n = 40]). **P < 0.01 compared with DMEM group, ##P < 0.01 compared with CVB3 group.

Discussion

Excessive inflammation and cardiac dysfunction are observed during CVB3-induced myocarditis and so an effective therapeutic approach to combat viral myocarditis would be to restrain the inflammatory process.[18] Reports have suggested that lupeol may have anticancer, antioxidant, anti-hyperglycaemic, anti-dyslipidaemia and anti-mutagenic properties.[19] Although the compound has not been investigated previously in viral myocarditis, several animal studies have found that it has anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects.[14,20-23] In our experiments we used a standard viral myocarditis mouse model established by CVB3. [4,5] Our results showed that the model had been established successfully as evidenced by decreased cardiac function, increased viral tires and levels of inflammatory cytokines and biomarkers. In addition, the survival rate for the CVB3 infected mice was reduced. We found that although lupeol at 50 or 100mg/kg alleviated the inflammatory response induced during the viral myocarditis, the 100 mg/kg dose had a higher efficacy. TLR4 is an important member of TLR family which are a group of proteins that are important mediators of innate immunity and recognize many inflammatory inducers.[9,24] There are two types of TLR4 signalling pathways (i.e., MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent). [24] In the MyD88-dependent pathway, following TLR4 activation MyD88, an adaptor molecule, is recruited to activate the NF-kB pathway which results in the production of inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, COX2 and TNF-α.[25] Therefore, affecting the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway will undoubtedly affect the inflammatory response.[7,8]Consistent with the results from a previous study using the CVB3-induced myocarditis mouse model,[10]we found that the expression of TLR4, MyD88 and p-NF-κB P65 were increased in CVB3-induced mice. These results indicated that the MyD88-dependent pathway had been activated during viral induced myocarditis. We found that lupeol at 50 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg inhibited the activation of the MyD88-dependent pathway as shown by the reduced protein expression of TLR4, MyD88 and p-NF-κB P65. In addition, gene silencing of TLR4 reduced the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, COX2 and TNF-α. Therefore, CVB3 may induce viral myocarditis by upregulating TLR4 expression. Interestingly, we found that gene silencing of TLR4 by using siRNA provided similar results to those achieved in the EXP-H group (CVB3+ lupeol 100mg/kg). To our knowledge, our study is the first to demonstrate the anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects of lupeol in CVB3-induced viral myocarditis in mice. The underlying mechanism for lupeol may due to inhibition of the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB P65 signalling pathway. However, there may be other possible target molecules for lupeol and involvement of other downstream molecules of TLR4. Further studies are required to confirm our results but these preliminary data suggest that lupeol may be a potential new therapeutic target for the treatment for viral-induced myocarditis.
  25 in total

1.  Isolation and expression of grass carp toll-like receptor 5a (CiTLR5a) and 5b (CiTLR5b) gene involved in the response to flagellin stimulation and grass carp reovirus infection.

Authors:  Yao Jiang; Libo He; Changsong Ju; Yongyan Pei; Myonghuan Ji; Yongming Li; Lanjie Liao; Songhun Jang; Zuoyan Zhu; Yaping Wang
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 4.581

2.  Resveratrol mitigates lipopolysaccharide- and Aβ-mediated microglial inflammation by inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB/STAT signaling cascade.

Authors:  Hemachander Capiralla; Valérie Vingtdeux; Haitian Zhao; Roman Sankowski; Yousef Al-Abed; Peter Davies; Philippe Marambaud
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 5.372

3.  Nitric oxide inhibits dystrophin proteolysis by coxsackieviral protease 2A through S-nitrosylation: A protective mechanism against enteroviral cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  C Badorff; B Fichtlscherer; R E Rhoads; A M Zeiher; A Muelsch; S Dimmeler; K U Knowlton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Coxsackievirus B3 induces viral myocarditis by upregulating toll-like receptor 4 expression.

Authors:  Zhao Zhao; Tian-Zhi Cai; Yan Lu; Wen-Jun Liu; Man-Li Cheng; Yu-Qiang Ji
Journal:  Biochemistry (Mosc)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  Protective effect of lupeol and its ester on cardiac abnormalities in experimental hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Varatharajan Sudhahar; Sekar Ashok Kumar; Periyasamy Thandavan Sudharsan; Palaninathan Varalakshmi
Journal:  Vascul Pharmacol       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 5.773

6.  Antinociceptive effect of lupeol: evidence for a role of cytokines inhibition.

Authors:  Flávia Oliveira de Lima; Vivian Alves; José Maria Barbosa Filho; Jackson Roberto Guedes da Silva Almeida; Luis Cezar Rodrigues; Milena Botelho Pereira Soares; Cristiane Flora Villarreal
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 5.878

7.  Lupeol and its ester exhibit protective role against cyclophosphamide-induced cardiac mitochondrial toxicity.

Authors:  Periyasamy Thandavan Sudharsan; Yenjerla Mythili; Elangovan Selvakumar; Palaninathan Varalakshmi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 8.  The Diagnostic and Clinical Approach to Pediatric Myocarditis: A Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Ramush Bejiqi; Ragip Retkoceri; Arlinda Maloku; Aferdita Mustafa; Hana Bejiqi; Rinor Bejiqi
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-01-04

9.  Mouse lung slices: An ex vivo model for the evaluation of antiviral and anti-inflammatory agents against influenza viruses.

Authors:  Rui Liu; Liwei An; Ge Liu; Xiaoyu Li; Wei Tang; Xulin Chen
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.970

10.  Necrotic neurons enhance microglial neurotoxicity through induction of glutaminase by a MyD88-dependent pathway.

Authors:  Teresa F Pais; Catarina Figueiredo; Rui Peixoto; Maria H Braz; Sukalyan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.322

View more
  3 in total

1.  Phytochemical Constituents of Citrus hystrix DC. Leaves Attenuate Inflammation via NF-κB Signaling and NLRP3 Inflammasome Activity in Macrophages.

Authors:  Watunyoo Buakaew; Rungnapa Pankla Sranujit; Chanai Noysang; Yordhathai Thongsri; Pachuen Potup; Nitra Nuengchamnong; Nungruthai Suphrom; Kanchana Usuwanthim
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-01-14

2.  Shenjinhuoxue Mixture Attenuates Inflammation, Pain, and Cartilage Degeneration by Inhibiting TLR-4 and NF-κB Activation in Rats with Osteoarthritis: A Synergistic Combination of Multitarget Active Phytochemicals.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Ma; Chenxia Hao; Zhaokang Zhang; Huiting Jiang; Weixia Zhang; Jingjing Huang; Xiaofei Chen; Wanhua Yang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 3.  Anti-viral triterpenes: a review.

Authors:  Priya Darshani; Shreya Sen Sarma; Amit K Srivastava; Rinku Baishya; Deepak Kumar
Journal:  Phytochem Rev       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 7.741

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.