| Literature DB >> 32290541 |
Kian Keong Poh1,2, Poay Sian Sabrina Lee1,2, Andie Hartanto Djohan1, Mary Joyce Galupo1, Geronica Gorospe Songco1, Tiong Cheng Yeo1,2, Huay Cheem Tan1,2, Arthur Mark Richards1,2, Lei Ye3.
Abstract
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are bone-marrow derived cells that are critical in the maintenance of endothelial wall integrity and protection of ischemic myocardium through the formation of new blood vessels (vasculogenesis) or proliferation of pre-existing vasculature (angiogenesis). Diabetes mellitus (DM) and the metabolic syndrome are commonly associated with ischemic heart disease through its pathological effects on the endothelium and consequent endothelial dysfunction. Thymosin-β4 (Tβ4) which expressed in the embryonic heart is critical in epicardial and coronary artery formation. In this study, we explored the effects of Tβ4 treatment on diabetic EPCs in vitro and intramyocardial injection of Tβ4-treated and non-Tβ4 treated EPCs following acute myocardial infarction (MI) of diabetic rats in vivo. It was found that 10 ng/mL Tβ4 increased migration, tubule formation, and angiogenic factor secretion of diabetic EPCs in vitro. In vivo, although implantation of Tβ4 treated diabetic EPCs significantly increased capillary density and attracted more c-Kit positive progenitor cells into the infarcted hearts as compared with implantation of non-Tβ4 treated diabetic EPCs, the significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction was only found in the rats which received non-Tβ4 treated EPCs. The data suggests that a low dose Tβ4 increases diabetic EPC migration, tubule formation, and angiogenic factor secretion. However, it did not improve the effects of EPCs on left ventricular pump function in diabetic rats with MI.Entities:
Keywords: endothelial progenitor cells; myocardial infarction; thymosin beta
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32290541 PMCID: PMC7226991 DOI: 10.3390/cells9040949
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Function of EPCs in vitro. Representative images of tubule formation on Matrigel by non-Tβ4 treated (A) and Tβ4-treated (B) EPCs. (C) Quantification of mean branch length of tubules. (D) Quantification of EPCs in migration assay (Magnification of A&B = 40×) (n = 8).
Figure 2(A) Gene expression levels of platelet derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from Tβ4-treated and non- Tβ4 treated EPCs. Protein concentrations of PDGF-BB and VEGF (B) or IGF-1 (C) from Tβ4-treated and non-Tβ4 treated EPCs as determined by respective ELISA kit (n = 8) (*: p < 0.05, vs. non-Tβ4 treated EPCs).
Figure 3Dot-plot of ejection fraction (EF) (A) and average myocardial circumferential systolic strain (AvgSc) (B) of each rat in the MI, EPC, and EPC + Tb4 Groups. (One-way ANOVA, * p < 0.05).
Effects of transplanted EPC with and without TB4 on echocardiographic parameters.
| MI ( | EPC ( | EPC + TB4 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 403 ± 34.5 | 423.83 ± 15.2 | 418.3 ± 4 |
| LVIDd (mm) | 8.7 ± 0.83 | 8.95 ± 1.4 | 7.9 6 ± 0.4 |
| LVIDs (mm) | 5.87 ± 1.43 | 4.95 ± 1.13 | 5.04 ± 0.3 |
| LVEF (%) | 53.9 ± 17.8 | 69.6 ± 5.9# | 59.34 ± 8 |
| Mitral E (cm/s) | 109.3 ± 14 | 105.7 ± 7.3 | 115.83 ± 58 |
| HR (bpm) | 206.3 ± 31.5 | 226.7 ± 21.1 | 234.67 ± 40.3 |
| Septal E’ (mm) | 62.7 ± 25.7 | 49 ± 10.5 | 64.83 ± 45 |
| Septal S’ (mm) | 45.2 ± 21.5 | 45.3 ± 11.6 | 40 ± 16.89 |
| LAT E’ (mm) | 49.5 ± 10.5 | 43.2 ± 11.1 | 50.67 ± 35.3 |
| LAT S’ (mm) | 36.7 ± 11.1 | 38 ± 10.5 | 33.67 ± 17.4 |
| Avg E’ (mm) | 56.1 ± 19.9 | 46.1 ± 10.7 | 57.8 ± 39.3 |
| Avg S’ (mm) | 40.9 ± 16.9 | 41.7 ± 11.2 | 36.8 ± 16.7 |
| Avg SC (%) | −11 ± 2.6 | −15.6 ± 3.6# | −13. 4 ± 3. 3 |
| Avg SR (%) | 17.1 ± 8.6 | 27.7 ± 16.1 | 22.6 ± 10.4 |
| Avg SrC S (1/s) | −3.49 ± 0.87 | −3.64 ± 0.35 | −3.64 ± 0.3 |
| Avg SrC E (1/s) | 3.82 ± 1.69 | 4.71 ± 0.82 | 4.95 ± 0. 0.86 |
| Avg SrC A (1/s) | 3.82 ± 1.64 | 3.59 ± 0.62 | 3.37 ± 0.7 |
| Avg SrR S (1/s) | 4.81 ± 1.26 | 4.5 ± 0.92 | 5.14 ± 1.08 |
| Avg SrR E (1/s) | −4.08 ± 3.75 | −6.67 ± 2.66 | −7.21 ± 1. 36 |
| Avg SrR A (1/s) | −5.26 ± 1.58 | −4.19 ± 2.27 | −4.18 ± 0.69 |
| Avg Rot S (°) | −2.7 ± 2 | −0.09 ± 2.65 | 0.1 ± 1.5 |
| Avg RotR S (°/s) | −101.8 ± 52.6 | −96.7 ± 78.7 | −68 ± 18.43 |
| Avg RotR E (°/s) | 111.6 ± 52.3 | 112.6 ± 47.5 | 118.76 ± 23.08 |
| Avg RotR A (°/s) | 119.1 ± 50.2 | 112.8 ± 42.6 | 90.22 ± 28.74 |
LVIDd: the end-diastolic internal dimension; LVIDs: the end-systolic internal dimension; LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction; Mitral E: Early diastolic transmitral flow; HR: heart rate; Septal E’: LV early diastolic myocardial velocity at septal mitral annulus; Septal S’:LV systolic myocardial velocity at septal mitral annulus; LAT E’: LV early diastolic myocardial velocity at lateral mitral annulus; LAT S’: LV systolic myocardial velocity at lateral mitral annulus; Avg E’: (Septal E’ + LAT E’)/2; AvgS’: (Septal S’ + LAT S’)/2; Avg SC: Average myocardial circumferential systolic strain; Avg SR: Average myocardial radial systolic strain; Avg SrC S: Average myocardial circumferential strain rate in systole; Avg SrC E: Average myocardial circumferential strain rate in early diastole; Avg SrC A: Average myocardial circumferential strain rate in late diastole; Avg SrR S: Average myocardial radial strain rate in systole; Avg SrR E: Average myocardial radial strain rate in early diastole; Avg SrR A: Average myocardial radial strain rate in late diastole; Avg Rot S: Average myocardial rotation in systole; Avg RotR S: Average myocardial rotation rate in systole; Avg RotR E: Average myocardial rotation rate in early diastole; Avg RotR A: Average myocardial rotation rate in late diastole. # p < 0.05 EPC group vs. myocardial infarction (MI) group.
Figure 4Fluorescence immunostaining for CD31+ (A1, B1, and C1) and smooth muscle actin (SMA) (A2, B2, and C2) expressions in hearts of MI, EPC, and EPC + Tβ4 rat groups. (A3) Overlay images of A1 and A2. (B3) Overlay images of B1 and B2. (C3) Overlay images of C1 and C2. Quantification of total vascular density based on CD31+ expression (D) and arteriole density based on co-localization of CD31+ and SMA (E) (A–C magnification = 200×) (n = 6 for each group).
Figure 5Fluorescence immunostaining for c-Kit (A1, B1, and C1) and cardiac troponin I (A2, B2, and C2) expressions in hearts of MI, EPC, and EPC + Tβ4 rat groups. (D) Quantification of c-Kit+ cardiac cells in in hearts of MI, EPC, and EPC + Tβ4 rat groups. (A–C magnification = 400×) (n = 6 for each group).