| Literature DB >> 32290311 |
Kholoud K Khoja1, Amy Buckley1, Mohamad F Aslam1, Paul A Sharp1, Gladys O Latunde-Dada1.
Abstract
Iron deficiency is a global epn>idemic afEntities:
Keywords: Microgreen; iron; mature; minerals; vegetables
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32290311 PMCID: PMC7231393 DOI: 10.3390/nu12041057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Moisture and mineral content in the dried vegetable samples (µg/g).
| Samples | Fenugreek | Rocket | Broccoli | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mature | Microgreen | Mature | Microgreen | Mature | Microgreen | |
| Moisture (%) | 86.97 | 90.52 | 92.6 | 92.28 | 89.89 | 92.12 |
| Fe | 108.5 ± 0.76 | 82.32 ± 1.22 **** | 130.82 ± 82.3 | 74.41 ± 1.21 **** | 54.37 ± 0.48 | 55.90 ± 1.03 |
| Ca | 26834.2 ± 139.56 | 7658.93 ± 79.58 **** | 36753.4 ± 319.08 | 22475.13 ±137.14 **** | 3911.91 ± 35.9 | 25601.7 ± 136.28 **** |
| Cu | 6.72 ± 0.22 | 9.15 ± 0.11 **** | 11.65 ± 0.32 | 9.93 ± 0.40 ** | 8.26 ± 0.42 | 6.40 ± 0.12 *** |
| Mg | 2687.4 ± 18.31 | 1645.0 ± 24.92 **** | 3886.85 ± 45.66 | 3472.46 ± 140.1 *** | 1752.92 ± 9.52 | 3702.53 ± 52.35 **** |
| Mn | 41.24 ± 1.4 | 24.94 ± 0.37 **** | 119.93 ± 1.22 | 92.30 ± 1.10 **** | 25.67 ± 0.20 | 115.0 ± 1.15 * |
| Mo | 6.18 ± 0.025 | 2.88 ± 0.05 **** | 3.23 ± 0.036 | 7.91 ± 0.29 **** | 1.67 ± 0.007 | 2.76 ± 0.046 **** |
| Zn | 23.27 ± 0.32 | 34.92 ± 0.52 **** | 80.29 ± 0.03 | 90.34 ± 1.58 **** | 52.22 ± 0.22 | 39.65 ± 0.67 **** |
Mineral contents, calcium (Ca), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn) and Molybdenum (Mo) in 100 g of sample. Results are presented as means ± SEM, n = 6. Comparison of means of microgreens and mature vegetables were analysed using an independent samples t-test. Different * indicates a significant difference: * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001) and **** (p ≤ 0.0001).
Total bioaccessible and low-molecular-weight iron in digest samples.
| Samples | Fenugreek | Rocket | Broccoli | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mature | Microgreens | Mature | Microgreens | Mature | Microgreens | ||
| Total Bioaccessible Iron (TBF) | µg/g | 61.07 ± 0.11 | 34.27 ± 0.11 **** | 25.02 ± 0.07 | 28.15 ± 0.64 **** | 24.73 ± 0.05 | 20.10 ± 0.02 **** |
| % | 56.26 ± 0.10 | 41.63 ± 0.13 **** | 19.13 ± 0.06 | 37.83 ± 0.87 **** | 45.49 ± 0.10 | 35.96 ± 0.31 **** | |
| Low-Molecular-Weight Iron (LMW) | µg/g | 6.32 ± 0.11 | 5.76 ± 0.11 | 7.29 ± 0.16 | 5.44 ± 0.08 **** | 6.00 ± 0.11 | 4.41 ± 0.06 **** |
| % | 5.82 ± 0.10 | 7.00 ± 0.14 | 5.58 ± 0.13 | 7.32 ± 0.12 | 11.04 ± 0.20 | 7.88 ± 0.11 ** | |
Results are presented as means of ± SEM, n = 3. Comparison of means of microgreens and mature vegetables were analysed using an independent samples t-test. ** (p ≤ 0.01), and **** (p ≤ 0.0001).
Figure 1Cell viability of Caco-2 after exposure to digest vegetable Mature (MT) and Microgreen (MG) samples alone or with added ascorbic acid (AA) during digestion for 2 h. Results are presented as means ± SEM, n = 4. Data were analysed using a one-way ANOVA test. Different letters on top of bars indicate a significant difference: * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001) and **** (p ≤ 0.0001).
Figure 2Iron uptake by Caco-2 cells from (a) Fenugreek, (b) Rocket, and (c) Broccoli mature (MT) and microgreen (MG) vegetables alone, with added ascorbic acid (AA) during digestion and vegetable samples with AA added during exposure to cells. The control treatment represents ferritin formation in Caco-2 cells in the presence of extract containing only the digestive enzymes. Results are presented as means ± SEM, n = 6. Data were analysed using a two-way ANOVA test. Different letters on top of bars indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between data in the same group. The differences between MT and MG groups of the same vegetables are denoted: * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001) and **** (p ≤ 0.0001).
Figure 3Iron uptake by Caco-2 cells from vegetable digests. Cells were exposed to the digest samples with added 50 µM: (a) FeSO4 (Fe(II)); and (b) FAC (Fe(III)). Results are presented as means of ± SEM n = 6. Data were analysed using a two-way ANOVA test between control and vegetable samples or among mature and microgreen samples. The differences between groups are denoted: * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01) and **** (p ≤ 0.0001).
Figure 4Phytic acid content (g/100 g) of the vegetable samples. Values are presented as means ± SEM, n = 6. Comparison of means of microgreens and mature vegetables were analysed using an independent samples t-test. The differences between the groups are denoted: * (p ≤ 0.05) and ** (p ≤ 0.01).