Literature DB >> 32289795

Return of Research-Related Genetic Test Results and Genetic Discrimination Concerns: Facilitators and Barriers of Genetic Research Participation in Diverse Groups.

Andrea N Burnett-Hartman1, Erica Blum-Barnett2, Nikki M Carroll2, Sarah D Madrid2, Cabell Jonas3, Kristen Janes4, Monica Alvarado5, Ruth Bedoy2, Valerie Paolino2, Nazneen Aziz6, Elizabeth A McGlynn7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most genetics studies lack the diversity necessary to ensure that all groups benefit from genetic research.
OBJECTIVES: To explore facilitators and barriers to genetic research participation.
METHODS: We conducted a survey on genetics in research and healthcare from November 15, 2017 to February 28, 2018 among adult Kaiser Permanente (KP) members who had been invited to participate in the KP biobank (KP Research Bank). We used logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the willingness to participate in genetic research under different return of results scenarios and genetic discrimination concerns between groups, according to their demographic characteristics.
RESULTS: A total of 57,331 KP members were invited to participate, and 10,369 completed the survey (18% response rate). Respondents were 65% female, 44% non-Hispanic White (NH White), 22% Asian/Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (Asian/PI), 19% non-Hispanic Black (NH Black), and 16% Hispanic. Respondents willing to participate in genetic research ranged from 22% with no results returned to 87% if health-related genetic results were returned. We also found variation by race/ethnicity; when no results were to be returned, Asian/PIs, Hispanics, and NH Blacks were less likely to want to participate than NH Whites (p < 0.05). However, when results were returned, disparities in the willingness to participate disappeared for NH Blacks and Hispanics. Genetic discrimination concerns were more prevalent in Asian/PIs, Hispanics, and NH Blacks than in NH Whites (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Policies that prohibit the return of results and do not address genetic discrimination concerns may contribute to a greater underrepresentation of diverse groups in genetic research.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Keywords:  GINA; Genetic research; Participation; Race/ethnicity; Return of results

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32289795     DOI: 10.1159/000507056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  7 in total

1.  Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A Framework for Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Genetics and Genomics Research.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck; John F P Bridges; Jennifer W Mack; Stacy W Gray; Jeffrey M Trent; Suzanne George; Norah L Crossnohere; Electra D Paskett; Corrie A Painter; Nikhil Wagle; Miria Kano; Patricia Nez Henderson; Jeffrey A Henderson; Shiraz I Mishra; Cheryl L Willman; Andrew L Sussman
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-04-15

Review 3.  Multisystem Proteinopathy Due to VCP Mutations: A Review of Clinical Heterogeneity and Genetic Diagnosis.

Authors:  Gerald Pfeffer; Grace Lee; Carly S Pontifex; Roberto D Fanganiello; Allison Peck; Conrad C Weihl; Virginia Kimonis
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.141

4.  Use of Community Listening Sessions to Disseminate Research Findings to Past Participants and Communities.

Authors:  Jennifer Cunningham-Erves; Elizabeth C Stewart; Jillian Duke; Leah Alexander; Jamaine Davis; Derek Wilus; Kimberlee Wyche-Etheridge; Stephania T Miller
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2021-10-08

5.  Promoting Inclusive Recruitment: a Qualitative Study of Black Adults' Decision to Participate in Genetic Research.

Authors:  Jade Connor; Ashley Kyalwazi; Ruth-Alma Turkson-Ocran; Daniele Ölveczky
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 5.801

6.  Exploring Rare Disease Patient Attitudes and Beliefs regarding Genetic Testing: Implications for Person-Centered Care.

Authors:  Andrew A Dwyer; Melissa K Uveges; Samantha Dockray; Neil Smith
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-16

Review 7.  Applying an equity lens to pharmacogenetic research and translation to under-represented populations.

Authors:  Tiana Luczak; David Stenehjem; Jacob Brown
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.689

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.