Literature DB >> 32289714

Determination of anodal tDCS duration threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: An investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms.

Maryam Hassanzahraee1, Michael A Nitsche2, Maryam Zoghi3, Shapour Jaberzadeh4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used to induce neuroplasticity in the human brain. Within certain limits of stimulation duration, anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) over the primary motor cortex induces long term potentiation- (LTP) like plasticity. A reversal of the direction of plasticity has however been described with prolonged a-tDCS protocols.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically investigate the intervention duration threshold for reversal of a-tDCS-induced effects on corticospinal excitability (CSE) and to determine the probable mechanisms involved in these changes.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy participants received a-tDCS of 1 mA for five different durations in pseudo-random session order. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered over the left M1, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of a contralateral hand muscle were recorded before, immediately and 30 min following intervention to measure CSE changes. Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and long interval facilitation (LIF) were assessed via paired-pulse TMS protocols.
RESULTS: A-tDCS significantly increased CSE as expected at stimulation durations of 22 and 24 min. However, this effect of a-tDCS on CSE decreased and even reversed when stimulation duration increased to 26, 28, and 30 min. Respective alterations of ICF, LIF, and SICI indicate the involvement of glutamatergic, and GABAergic systems in these effects.
CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm a duration threshold for reversal of the excitability-enhancing effect of a-tDCS with stimulation durations ≥ 26 min. Counter-regulatory mechanisms are discussed as a mechanistic foundation for these effects, which might prevent excessive brain activation.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corticospinal excitability; Motor cortex; Motor evoked potential; Plasticity; TMS; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32289714     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  11 in total

1.  Network-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation May Modulate Gait Variability in Young Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Rong Zhou; Junhong Zhou; Yanwen Xiao; Jiawei Bi; Maria Chiara Biagi; Giulio Ruffini; Natalia A Gouskova; Brad Manor; Yu Liu; Jiaojiao Lü; On-Yee Lo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 2.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Remediate Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Cheshire Hardcastle; Alejandro Albizu; Stacey Alvarez-Alvarado; Emanuel M Boutzoukas; Nicole D Evangelista; Hanna K Hausman; Jessica Kraft; Kailey Langer; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.570

3.  Manipulating placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia by changing brain excitability.

Authors:  Yiheng Tu; Georgia Wilson; Joan Camprodon; Darin D Dougherty; Mark Vangel; Fabrizio Benedetti; Ted J Kaptchuk; Randy L Gollub; Jian Kong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of cerebellum alters spiking precision in cerebellar cortex: A modeling study of cellular responses.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Roeland Hancock; Sabato Santaniello
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  A Literature Mini-Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Zuzana Stuchlíková; Monika Klírová
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Effect of a tailored upper extremity strength training intervention combined with direct current stimulation in chronic stroke survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Stephania Palimeris; Yekta Ansari; Anthony Remaud; François Tremblay; Hélène Corriveau; Marie Hélène Boudrias; Marie Hélène Milot
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-08-03

7.  Bimanual motor skill learning after stroke: Combining robotics and anodal tDCS over the undamaged hemisphere: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Chloë De Laet; Benoît Herman; Audrey Riga; Benoît Bihin; Maxime Regnier; Maria Leeuwerck; Jean-Marc Raymackers; Yves Vandermeeren
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Effects of Different Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Haemodynamic Responses and Motor Performance in Acute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Wanalee Klomjai; Benchaporn Aneksan; Songkram Chotik-Anuchit; Pentida Jitkaew; Kasina Chaichanudomsuk; Pagamas Piriyaprasarth; Roongtiwa Vachalathiti; Yongchai Nilanon; Vimonwan Hiengkaew
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Determination of anodal tDCS intensity threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: an investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms.

Authors:  Maryam Hassanzahraee; Michael A Nitsche; Maryam Zoghi; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Dosage-Dependent Impact of Acute Serotonin Enhancement on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects.

Authors:  Lorena Melo; Mohsen Mosayebi-Samani; Elham Ghanavati; Michael A Nitsche; Min-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 5.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.