BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a possible method for remediating age-associated cognitive decline in the older adult population. While tDCS has shown potential for improving cognitive functions in healthy older adults, stimulation outcomes on various cognitive domains have been mixed. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsychInfo. Search results were then screened for eligibility based on inclusion/exclusion criteria to only include studies where tDCS was applied to improve cognition in healthy older adults 65 years and above. Eligible studies were reviewed and demographic characteristics, tDCS dose parameters, study procedures, and cognitive outcomes were extracted. Reported effect sizes for active compared to sham group in representative cognitive domain were converted to Hedges' g. MAIN RESULTS: A total of thirteen studies involving healthy older adults (n=532, mean age=71.2+5.3 years) were included in the meta-analysis. The majority of included studies (94%) targeted the prefrontal cortex with stimulation intensity 1-2 mA using various electrode placements with anodes near the frontal region. Across all studies, we found Hedges' g values ranged from -0.31 to 1.85 as reported group effect sizes of active stimulation compared to sham. CONCLUSION: While observed outcomes varied, overall findings indicated promising effects of tDCS to remediate cognitive aging and thus deserves further exploration. Future characterization of inter-individual variability in tDCS dose response and applications in larger cohorts are warranted to further validate benefits of tDCS for cognition in healthy older adults.
BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a possible method for remediating age-associated cognitive decline in the older adult population. While tDCS has shown potential for improving cognitive functions in healthy older adults, stimulation outcomes on various cognitive domains have been mixed. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsychInfo. Search results were then screened for eligibility based on inclusion/exclusion criteria to only include studies where tDCS was applied to improve cognition in healthy older adults 65 years and above. Eligible studies were reviewed and demographic characteristics, tDCS dose parameters, study procedures, and cognitive outcomes were extracted. Reported effect sizes for active compared to sham group in representative cognitive domain were converted to Hedges' g. MAIN RESULTS: A total of thirteen studies involving healthy older adults (n=532, mean age=71.2+5.3 years) were included in the meta-analysis. The majority of included studies (94%) targeted the prefrontal cortex with stimulation intensity 1-2 mA using various electrode placements with anodes near the frontal region. Across all studies, we found Hedges' g values ranged from -0.31 to 1.85 as reported group effect sizes of active stimulation compared to sham. CONCLUSION: While observed outcomes varied, overall findings indicated promising effects of tDCS to remediate cognitive aging and thus deserves further exploration. Future characterization of inter-individual variability in tDCS dose response and applications in larger cohorts are warranted to further validate benefits of tDCS for cognition in healthy older adults.
Authors: Donel M Martin; Rose Liu; Angelo Alonzo; Melissa Green; Michael J Player; Perminder Sachdev; Colleen K Loo Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Siobhán Harty; Ian H Robertson; Carlo Miniussi; Owen C Sheehy; Ciara A Devine; Sarahjane McCreery; Redmond G O'Connell Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Vishal Rawji; Matteo Ciocca; André Zacharia; David Soares; Dennis Truong; Marom Bikson; John Rothwell; Sven Bestmann Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Cheshire Hardcastle; Hanna K Hausman; Jessica N Kraft; Alejandro Albizu; Nicole D Evangelista; Emanuel M Boutzoukas; Andrew O'Shea; Kailey Langer; Emily Van Van Etten; Pradyumna K Bharadwaj; Hyun Song; Samantha G Smith; Eric Porges; Steven T DeKosky; Georg A Hishaw; Samuel S Wu; Michael Marsiske; Ronald Cohen; Gene E Alexander; Adam J Woods Journal: Geroscience Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Cheshire Hardcastle; Hanna K Hausman; Jessica N Kraft; Alejandro Albizu; Andrew O'Shea; Emanuel M Boutzoukas; Nicole D Evangelista; Kailey Langer; Emily J Van Etten; Pradyumna K Bharadwaj; Hyun Song; Samantha G Smith; Eric Porges; Steven T DeKosky; Georg A Hishaw; Samuel S Wu; Michael Marsiske; Ronald Cohen; Gene E Alexander; Adam J Woods Journal: Geroscience Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 7.581
Authors: Aprinda Indahlastari; Alejandro Albizu; Jessica N Kraft; Andrew O'Shea; Nicole R Nissim; Ayden L Dunn; Daniela Carballo; Michael P Gordon; Shreya Taank; Alex T Kahn; Cindy Hernandez; William M Zucker; Adam J Woods Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2021-08-08 Impact factor: 8.955