| Literature DB >> 32288257 |
Shuibing Wang1,2,3, Zhao Ai1,2,3, Zefen Zhang1,2,3, Man Tang1,2,3, Nangang Zhang1,2,3, Feng Liu1,2,3, Gujing Han1,2,3, Shao-Li Hong1,2,3,4, Kan Liu1,2,3,5.
Abstract
Influenza viruses with multiple subtypes have highly virulent in humans, of which influenza hemagglutinin (HA) is the major viral surface antigen. Simultaneous and automated detection of multiple influenza HA are of great importance for early-stage diagnosis and operator protection. Herein, a magnetism and size mediated microfluidic platform was developed for point-of-care detection of multiple influenza HA. With multiplex microvalves and computer program control, the detection process showed high automation which had a great potential for avoiding the high-risk virus exposure to the operator. Taking advantage of magnetism and size mediated multiple physical fields, multiple influenza HA could be simultaneous separation and detection depended on different-size magnetic beads. Using high-luminance quantum dots as reporter, this assay achieved high sensitivity with a detection limit of 3.4 ng/mL for H7N9 HA and 4.5 ng/mL for H9N2 HA, and showed excellent specificity, anti-interference ability and good reproducibility. These results indicate that this method may propose new avenues for early detection of multiple influenza subtypes.Entities:
Keywords: Influenza detection; Magnetism and size; Microfluidic chip; Multiple physical fields
Year: 2020 PMID: 32288257 PMCID: PMC7125920 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.127675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sens Actuators B Chem ISSN: 0925-4005 Impact factor: 7.460
Scheme 1Schematic illustration for the automated detection platform.
Fig. 1Microscopic images of IMBs (bright field, fluorescence field, and merge, respectively). (A–C) Microscopic images of H7N9 antibody modified magnetic beads. (D–F) Microscopic images of H7N9 antibody unmodified magnetic beads. The scale bar is 50 μm.
Fig. 2(A) Microscopic image of microvalves controlling. (B) Numerical simulation of the magnetophoretic separation. (C) Microscopic image of magnetic beads in the separation zone. (D) Microscopic image of magnetic beads in the detection zone. (E) The photograph of the detection platform. The scale bar is 200 μm.
Fig. 3(A–F) Fluorescence microscopic images of different concentrations of samples (0, 10.0, 20, 50.0, 100.0, and 500.0 ng/mL, respectively). (G) Fluorescence intensity for H7N9 HA in 5−500 ng/mL. (H) Linear response for H7N9 HA with the concentration range of 5.0–100.0 ng/mL. (I) Fluorescence intensity for H9N2 HA in 5−500 ng/mL. (H) Linear response for H9N2 HA with the concentration range of 5.0–100.0 ng/mL. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three experiments. The scale bar is 10 μm.
Fig. 4(A). Histograms of the specificity of H7N9 HA. (B) Histograms of the specificity of H9N2 HA. (C) Histogram of H7N9 fluorescence intensity in different samples. (D) Histogram of H9N2 fluorescence intensity in different samples. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three experiments.
Intra- and Interassay Variability of This Method.
| Intra-assay | Interassay | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | CV (n = 5) | Mean | SD | CV (n = 5) | |
| H7N9 | 242.5 | 10.9 | 4.5 % | 251.2 | 18.3 | 7.3 % |
| H9N2 | 115.1 | 4.3 | 3.7 % | 125.3 | 7.8 | 6.2 % |