| Literature DB >> 32287835 |
P Subramaniam1, S Sugirtha Devi2, S Anbarasan1.
Abstract
The mechanism of oxidative decarboxylation of phenylsulfinylacetic acids (PSAA) by oxo(salen)Cr(V)+ ion in the presence of ligand oxides has been studied spectrophotometrically in acetonitrile medium. Addition of ligand oxides (LO) causes a red shift in the λ max values of oxo(salen) complexes and an increase in absorbance with the concentration of LO along with a clear isobestic point. The reaction shows first-order dependence on oxo(salen)-chromium(V)+ ion and fractional-order dependence on PSAA and ligand oxide. Michaelis-Menten kinetics without kinetic saturation was observed for the reaction. The order of reactivity among the ligand oxides is picoline N-oxide > pyridine N-oxide > triphenylphosphine oxide. The low catalytic activity of TPPO was rationalized. Both electron-withdrawing and electron-donating substituents in the phenyl ring of PSAA facilitate the reaction rate. The Hammett plots are non-linear upward type with negative ρ value for electron-donating substituents, (ρ - = -0.740 to -4.10) and positive ρ value for electron-withdrawing substituents (ρ + = +0.057 to +0.886). Non-linear Hammett plot is explained by two possible mechanistic scenarios, electrophilic and nucleophilic attack of oxo(salen)chromium(V)+-LO adduct on PSAA as the substituent in PSAA is changed from electron-donating to electron-withdrawing. The linearity in the log k vs. E ox plot confirms single-electron transfer (SET) mechanism for PSAAs with electron-donating substituents.Entities:
Keywords: LO, ligand oxide; Michaelis–Menten kinetics; Non-linear Hammett plot; OD, optical density; Oxo(salen)chromium(V); PSAA, phenylsulfinylacetic acid; Phenylsulfinylacetic acid; PicNO, picoline N-oxide; PyO, pyridine N-oxide; SET, single electron-transfer; Single electron-transfer; TPPO, triphenylphosphine oxide; salen, N,N′-bis(salicylidene)-ethylenediaminato
Year: 2016 PMID: 32287835 PMCID: PMC7116920 DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2016.05.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polyhedron ISSN: 0277-5387 Impact factor: 3.052
Scheme 1Oxidative decarboxylation of PSAA by oxo(salen)Cr(V)+ ion.
λmax values of oxo(salen)chromium(V)+ PF6− complexes in the presence of PSAA and ligand oxides.
| Complex | λmax (nm) in the presence of additives | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without additive | PSAA | TPPO | PyO | PicNO | ||||
| a | b | c | b | c | b | c | ||
| 560 | 584 | 613 | 595 | 612 | 597 | 612 | 598 | |
| 557 | 570 | 633 | 621 | 635 | 630 | 627 | 617 | |
| 584 | 622 | 640 | 627 | 627 | 627 | 627 | 622 | |
aoxo(salen) + PSAA.
boxo(salen) + LO.
coxo(salen) + PSAA + LO.
Fig. 1Absorption changes of Ia and Ic during spectral titration with ligand oxides.
Binding constant values of Ia-Ic with ligand oxides.
| Complex | Binding constant (M−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TPPO | PyO | PicNO | |
| 49.0 | 1817 | 747 | |
| 40.8 | 985 | 78.6 | |
| 129 | 3160 | 1892 | |
Fig. 2The absorption spectral change with time for the reaction between PSAA and Ic in the presence of TPPO. [PSAA] = 2 × 10−1 M; [Ic] = 5 × 10−4 M; [TPPO] = 1 × 10−2 M.
Fig. 3Plots of k1 vs. [PSAA] for the reactions. a, Ia with TPPO; b, Ia with PyO; c, Ia with PicNO; d, Ib with TPPO; e, Ib with PyO; f, Ib with PicNO; g, Ic with TPPO; h, Ic with PyO; i, Ic with PicNO. General conditions are as in Table 3.
Overall rate constants for the oxidative decarboxylation of PSAAs by Ia–Ic in the presence of ligand oxides.
| X-PSAA | 104 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | |||||||
| TPPO | PyO | PicNO | TPPO | PyO | PicNO | TPPO | PyO | ||
| 49.1 ± 0.83 | 82.9 ± 2.5 | 76.3 ± 0.30 | 57.8 ± 0.24 | 79.6 ± 0.18 | 65.9 ± 0.67 | 109 ± 8.9 | 119 ± 9.7 | 244 ± 3.1 | |
| 36.0 ± 1.3 | 79.8 ± 0.61 | 56.6 ± 1.9 | 43.4 ± 2.0 | 60.0 ± 0.73 | 54.1 ± 1.1 | 86.7 ± 2.7 | 105 ± 7.5 | 148 ± 14 | |
| 14.4 ± 0.25 | 60.2 ± 1.6 | 56.5 ± 0.59 | 28.0 ± 1.0 | 48.5 ± 1.5 | 50.7 ± 1.2 | 31.4 ± 0.77 | 90.0 ± 2.7 | 110 ± 1.0 | |
| 8.37 ± 0.15 | 50.0 ± 2.3 | 46.2 ± 0.63 | 15.4 ± 0.27 | 42.2 ± 1.9 | 40.8 ± 4.4 | 17.6 ± 0.49 | 79.0 ± 6.8 | 65.0 ± 1.2 | |
| H | 7.43 ± 0.40 | 51.7 ± 1.2 | 30.0 ± 1.6 | 14.7 ± 0.51 | 35.2 ± 0.48 | 27.4 ± 0.81 | 16.4 ± 0.49 | 73.4 ± 3.1 | 48.1 ± 2.4 |
| 8.69 ± 0.18 | 50.3 ± 0.50 | 30.4 ± 0.28 | 15.2 ± 0.16 | 37.0 ± 0.14 | 29.2 ± 0.15 | 17.1 ± 0.42 | 80.5 ± 0.39 | 50.8 ± 1.1 | |
| 11.4 ± 1.7 | 52.1 ± 2.6 | 32.4 ± 0.34 | 17.8 ± 0.45 | 38.5 ± 3.2 | 29.9 ± 1.1 | 21.2 ± 0.28 | 95.2 ± 0.51 | 53.1 ± 1.3 | |
| 12.9 ± 0.77 | 53.6 ± 0.76 | 33.4 ± 1.9 | 25.9 ± 0.48 | 41.0 ± 1.8 | 32.8 ± 0.58 | 27.0 ± 1.1 | 130 ± 4.9 | 52.9 ± 0.75 | |
| 14.6 ± 0.23 | 54.3 ± 0.16 | 34.5 ± 0.13 | 20.0 ± 0.47 | 40.2 ± 3.3 | 34.3 ± 0.43 | 33.1 ± 0.75 | 131 ± 0.48 | 54.0 ± 0 .28 | |
| 25.8 ± 2.5 | 56.1 ± 2.0 | 49.8 ± 1.2 | 51.2 ± 1.6 | 52.5 ± 2.9 | 47.8 ± 1.6 | 76.7 ± 1.4 | 172 ± 11 | 58.6 ± 6.8 | |
| −3.12 ± 0.52 | −1.16 ± 0.15 | −1.24 ± 0.26 | −2.27 ± 0.29 | −1.15 ± 0.20 | −1.23 ± 0.19 | −4.10 ± 0.60 | −0.740 ± 0.10 | −2.42 ± 0.28 | |
| 0.655 ± 0.03 | 0.057 ± 0.01 | 0.308 ± 0.04 | 0.751 ± 0.12 | 0.214 ± 0.02 | 0.303 ± 0.03 | 0.886 ± 0.07 | 0.491 ± 0.07 | 0.084 ± 0.01 | |
[TPPO] = 1.0 × 10−2 M; [PyO] = 5.0 × 10−3 M; [PicNO] = 1.0 × 10−3 M. [Ia] = [Ib] = [Ic] = 5.0 × 10−4 M.
For (Ic) [PicNO] = 5.0 × 10−4 M; Temp. = 303 K; solvent = 100% CH3CN; n = order w.r.t. PSAA.
Fig. 4Hammett plots for the substituent variation in PSAA in the presence of ligand oxides.
Scheme 2Possible electrophilic and nucleophilic pathways.
Fig. 5Log kov vs. Eox plot for the reaction of PSAA with Ic in the presence of ligand oxides. The numbers are in the order p-OMe, p-OEt, p-Me, m-Me, H, p-F, p-Cl, m-F m-Cl and p-NO2.
Fig. 6Resonance structures for electron-withdrawing substituents.