Addition of anionic donors to the manganese(V)-oxo corrolazine complex Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz) has a dramatic influence on oxygen-atom transfer (OAT) reactivity with thioether substrates. The six-coordinate anionic [Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)](-) complexes (X = F(-), N3(-), OCN(-)) exhibit a ∼5 cm(-1) downshift of the Mn-O vibrational mode relative to the parent Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz) complex as seen by resonance Raman spectroscopy. Product analysis shows that the oxidation of thioether substrates gives sulfoxide product, consistent with single OAT. A wide range of OAT reactivity is seen for the different axial ligands, with the following trend determined from a comparison of their second-order rate constants for sulfoxidation: five-coordinate ≈ thiocyanate ≈ nitrate < cyanate < azide < fluoride ≪ cyanide. This trend correlates with DFT calculations on the binding of the axial donors to the parent Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz) complex. A Hammett study was performed with p-X-C6H4SCH3 derivatives and [Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)](-) (X = CN(-) or F(-)) as the oxidant, and unusual "V-shaped" Hammett plots were obtained. These results are rationalized based upon a change in mechanism that hinges on the ability of the [Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)](-) complexes to function as either an electrophilic or weak nucleophilic oxidant depending upon the nature of the para-X substituents. For comparison, the one-electron-oxidized cationic Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz(•+)) complex yielded a linear Hammett relationship for all substrates (ρ = -1.40), consistent with a straightforward electrophilic mechanism. This study provides new, fundamental insights regarding the influence of axial donors on high-valent Mn(V)(O) porphyrinoid complexes.
Addition of anionicdonors to the manganese(V)-oxo corrolazinecomplexMn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz) has a dramatic influence on oxygen-atom transfer (OAT) reactivity with thioether substrates. The six-coordinate anionic [Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)](-) complexes (X = F(-), N3(-), OCN(-)) exhibit a ∼5 cm(-1) downshift of the Mn-O vibrational mode relative to the parent Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz) complex as seen by resonance Raman spectroscopy. Product analysis shows that the oxidation of thioether substrates gives sulfoxide product, consistent with single OAT. A wide range of OAT reactivity is seen for the different axial ligands, with the following trend determined from a comparison of their second-order rate constants for sulfoxidation: five-coordinate ≈ thiocyanate ≈ nitrate < cyanate < azide < fluoride ≪ cyanide. This trend correlates with DFT calculations on the binding of the axial donors to the parent Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz) complex. A Hammett study was performed with p-X-C6H4SCH3 derivatives and [Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)](-) (X = CN(-) or F(-)) as the oxidant, and unusual "V-shaped" Hammett plots were obtained. These results are rationalized based upon a change in mechanism that hinges on the ability of the [Mn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)](-) complexes to function as either an electrophilic or weak nucleophilic oxidant depending upon the nature of the para-X substituents. For comparison, the one-electron-oxidized cationicMn(V)(O)(TBP8Cz(•+)) complex yielded a linear Hammett relationship for all substrates (ρ = -1.40), consistent with a straightforward electrophilic mechanism. This study provides new, fundamental insights regarding the influence of axial donors on high-valent Mn(V)(O) porphyrinoidcomplexes.
A
key structural factor that contributes to metal-oxo reactivity
in heme enzymes is the nature of the axial ligands coordinated trans
to the oxo group. The concept of axial ligand tuning is exemplified
in the powerful oxygenating enzyme Cytochrome P450, in which the anionic,
deprotonated Cys ligand is believed to play a critical role. It has
been suggested that the Cys in Cyt-P450 plays an essential role in
modulating the reactivity of Compound-I (Cpd-I), FeIV(O)(porph•+)(Cys), (porph = porphyrin) which is the key intermediate
prior to substrate oxidation.[1−7] Further evidence for the importance of the axial donor lies in the
fact that it is the major feature that distinguishes broad classes
of heme enzymes, with Cyt-P450 and chloroperoxidase (CPO) containing
an axial Cys, peroxidase containing an axial His,[8−10] and catalase
containing an axial Tyr ligand.[11,12]The preparation
of synthetic analogs of heme enzymes has provided
a means to test mechanistic hypotheses regarding the influence of
axial donors. Synthetic models of heme active sites are particularly
useful for examining complexes that are analogous to the highly unstable
intermediates in enzyme systems, including high-valent metal-oxo species.
Regarding the influence of axial donors on these species, a potential
advantage of model systems is the ability to rationally tune the nature
of the axial ligand by varying its structural and electronic properties
in a systematic fashion. The influence of axial ligands on high-valent,
iron-oxo porphyrin models has been investigated, including the examination
of the effects of axial donors on oxygen-atom transfer (OAT) reactivity.
For example, axial ligands were shown to enhance the reactivity of
Fe(O)(porph) in epoxidations.[13−21] A recent study on the effects of axial ligation on Cpd-I analogs,
FeIV(O)(porph•+)(X), provided a detailed
thermodynamic analysis which led to a possible explanation for the
trend in OAT reactivity versus axial donor.[15] The mechanisms of these reactions and especially the exact role
played by the axial ligands are still not well understood.In
contrast to Fe(O) species, the influence of axial donors on
analogous Mn(O) porphyrinoidcomplexes has been much less studied,
with very few systematic investigations for a wide range of axial
ligands reported to date.[22−30] One of the few examples comes from Chang and co-workers, who showed
that the reactivity of an MnV(O) corrole toward styrenecan be enhanced by 10-fold with an imidazole as an axial ligand.[23] The effects of axial donors on nonhemeMn(O)complexes such as Mn(O)(salen)(X) have been reported.[31−34] However, direct structural, spectroscopic, or reactivity information
on these complexes is in general quite limited because of the transient
nature of these species.[31]Previously,
we took advantage of our ability to isolate and definitively
characterize a relatively stable high-valent MnV(O) complex
MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) (TBP8Cz = octakis(p-tert-butylphenyl)corrolazinato3–), which contains a ring-contracted porphyrinoid ligand, in order
to examine the influence of cyanide and fluoride ions on C–H
activation. Indirect evidence was obtained that suggested CN– and F– were weakly bound trans to the terminal oxo ligand and caused significant increases in H-atom
abstraction rates.[35] More recently, we
used X-ray absorption spectroscopy to characterize one of these complexes,
[MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(CN)]−, and
showed that CN– was indeed coordinated to the metal
while leaving the short MnV–O bond intact.[36] Addition of the CN– donorcaused a large rate enhancement in OAT to thioanisole, giving the
predicted two-electron reduced MnIIIcomplex and sulfoxide
product.Herein we describe a comprehensive study regarding
the influence
of a wide range of anionic axial ligands on the OAT reactivity of
an MnV(O) porphyrinoidcomplex. Significant rate enhancements
for OAT to thioether substrates are seen for different axial donors.
The use of a series of p-X-C6H4SCH3 substrates provides a range of OAT rates for the
cyanide- and fluoride-ligated MnV(O) complexes, revealing
unexpected “V-shaped” Hammett plots. These results point
to a dramatic switch in mechanism for OAT, depending upon the nature
of the substrate. This work provides new, fundamental insights regarding
the influence of axial donors on the OAT reactivity of rarely observed
MnV(O) porphyrinoidcomplexes.
Experimental
Section
Materials
All reactions were performed under an argon
atmosphere using dry solvents and standard Schlenk techniques. The
MnIII(TBP8Cz) and MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) complexes were synthesized according to published methods.[37] Solvents were purified via a Pure-Solv solvent
purification system from Innovative Technologies, Inc. H218O (97% 18O) was purchased from Cambridge
Isotopes, Inc. All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
at the highest level of purity and used as received.
Instrumentation
UV–vis spectroscopy was performed
on a Hewlett-Packard 8542 diode-array equipped with HPChemstation
software. A filter was placed between the spectrometer light and the
sample to prevent bleaching of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− from UV light (<400 nm). The temperature-dependent
kinetics were performed on a Hewlett-Packard 8453 diode-array spectrophotometer
equipped with an Unisoku thermostat cell holder. Gas chromatography
(GC) was performed on an Agilent 6850 gas chromatograph fitted with
a DB-5 5% phenylmethyl siloxanecapillary column (30 m × 0.32
mm × 0.25 μm) and equipped with a flame-ionization detector.
GC mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was performed on an Agilent 6850 gas
chromatograph fitted with a DB-5 5% phenylmethyl siloxanecapillary
column and equipped with a mass spectrometer. LDI-TOF was conducted
on a Bruker Autoflex III TOF/TOF instrument equipped with a nitrogen
laser at 335 nm using an MTP 384 ground steel target plate. 31P NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz NMR spectrometer
at 298 K. All spectra were taken in 5 mm o.d. NMR tubes, and chemical
shifts were reported as δ values from standard peaks.
Resonance
Raman Sample Preparation
A solution of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) (1 mM) in CH2Cl2 (250 μL)
at 25 °C was combined with Bu4N+X– (X = F, N3, OCN at 1 M). Samples
were loaded into an EPR tube, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen,
and stored at 77 K until measurements were performed.
Resonance Raman
Spectroscopy
Resonance Raman spectra
were recorded on a triVista 555 triple monochromator (900/900/2400
gr/mm) equipped with a CCD camera (1340 × 100 pixels). A 413.2
nm line of a krypton-ion laser was used for excitation. The laser
power was <15 mW at the sample to reduce the risk of photoreduction.
900/900/2400 gr/mm gratings provided a resolution of 0.69 cm–1 per CCD pixel at 413.2 nm. Samples were held in an EPR finger-dewar
(77 K) in a 135° backscattering arrangement. Raw spectra were
analyzed using the program Igor Pro for background subtraction. No
smoothing procedures were performed on the raw data.
Product Analysis
In a typical reaction, a stirring
solution of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) (0.2 or 5 mM) in
CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was combined with an anionicdonorBu4N+F– (1.3 or 12 mM) at
25 °C. To initiate the reaction, dimethyl sulfide (DMS): 11 M
or triphenylphosphine (PPh3): 5 mM was added. Isosbesticconversion of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(F)]− (λmax = 419, 634 nm) to [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(F)]− (λmax = 428, 471,
680 nm) was observed by UV–vis spectroscopy. Upon completion
of the reaction, the solution was concentrated to ∼50 μL
under vacuum. The phosphine reaction was dissolved in CDCl3 and analyzed by 31P NMR. The yield was obtained by comparing
the integration of the product peak, triphenylphosphine oxide, to
that of the reactant peak (PPh3). To analyze the DMS reaction, n-decane was added as an internal standard, and the solution
was immediately analyzed by GC-FID. The product, dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO), was identified by comparison with a standard sample. Yields
were obtained by comparing the integration of the product peak with
the integration of the internal standard peak. All yields are an average
of two runs.
OAT Reaction of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− with DMS and Dibutyl Sulfide
In a typical
reaction, a solution of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) (11 μM)
in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) at 25 °C was combined
with Bu4N+X– (11 mM) (X =
N3, OCN, SCN, NO3) or Bu4N+F–·3H2O (0.03 M). Excess DMS or
dibutyl sulfide (DBS) was added to begin the reaction. The changes
in absorbance were monitored by UV–vis spectroscopy showing
the isosbestic decay of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− (λmax = 419, 634 nm) and formation
the of [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(X)]−. A filter was placed between the spectrometer light and the sample
to prevent bleaching of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− from UV light (<400 nm). The pseudo-first-order
rate constants, kobs, were obtained by
nonlinear least-squares fitting (eq 1) of the
growth in absorbance of [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(X)]− at 680–693 nm or decay of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− at 634 nm versus time:where Absf = final absorbance,
Abs0 = initial absorbance, and Abst = absorbance
at time (t). Second-order rate constants were obtained
from the slope of the best-fit line of the linear plot of kobs versus substrate concentration.
Measurement
of the Binding Constant for Fluoride to MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)
A solution of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) (10 μM) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) at
25 °C was combined with DBS (2.7 mM). The reaction was initiated
by the addition of Bu4N+F–·3H2O (1.7–59 mM). The changes in absorbance
were monitored by UV–vis spectroscopy showing the isosbestic
decay of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(F)]− (λmax = 419, 634 nm) and formation of [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(F)]− (λmax = 469, 680 nm). The pseudo-first-order rate constants, kobs, were obtained by nonlinear least-squares fitting
(eq 1) of the growth in absorbance of [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(F)]− at 680 nm versus
time. A plot of kobs versus [F–] showed saturation behavior.The data were modeled for a 1:1
binding event as shown in eq 2, where the association
constant K = k1/k–1, k2 is the pseudo-first-order
rate constant for a given concentration of DMS, and [F–]total is the total concentration of TBAF.[38] A fit of 1/kobs and
1/[F–]total plot is given in eq 3.
Linear Free
Energy Correlations for OAT of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− to para-Substituted
Thioanisoles
A solution of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) (12 μM for CN–; 15 μM for F–) in toluene (X = CN–) or CH2Cl2 (X = F–) (2 mL) at 25 °C
was combined with a para-substituted thioanisole
(0.13 M). The reaction was initiated by the addition of Bu4N+X– (12 mM, X = CN–; 15 mM, X = F–). The changes in absorbance were
monitored by UV–vis spectroscopy showing the isosbestic decay
of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− (λmax = 419, 634 nm) and formation of [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(X)]− (λmax = 443, 492,
694 nm, X = CN–; λmax = 470, 679
nm, X = F–). The pseudo-first-order (kobs) rate constants were obtained as described above.
The log(kX/kH) for each para-substituted thioanisole was graphed
versus its Hammett constant (σ).[39]
Linear Free Energy Correlations for OAT of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz•+) to para-Substituted
Thioanisoles
Following an earlier report,[40] a solution of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) (11
μM) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) at 25 °C was
combined with a one-electron oxidant [(4-BrC6H4)3N•+](SbCl6–) (11 μM) and monitored by UV–vis spectroscopy which
showed the isosbesticconversion of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) (λmax = 419, 634 nm) to [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz•+)] (λmax = 410, 780
nm). Once complete formation of the MnV(O)(TBP8Cz•+) complex was observed the OAT reaction was
initiated by the addition of a para-substituted thioanisole
(0.13 M). The changes in absorbance were monitored by UV–vis
spectroscopy showing the isosbestic decay of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz•+)] (λmax = 410, 780
nm) and formation of [MnIV(TBP8Cz)]+ (λmax = 433, 669, and 722 nm). The pseudo-first-order
(kobs) rate constants were obtained by
nonlinear least-squares fitting (eq 1) of the
growth in absorbance of [MnIV(TBP8Cz)]+ at 722 nm versus time. The log(kX/kH) for each para-substitutedthioanisole was graphed versus its Hammet constant (σ).[39]
Results and Discussion
OAT Reactivity of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(F)]− with Thioether
and Phosphine Substrates
Kinetic
analysis showed that the oxidation of thioether substrates by MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) was relatively slow, with second-order
rate constants of 2.0 × 10–3 M–1 s–1 for DMS and 3.8 × 10–4 M–1 s–1 for DBS.[40] The addition of CN– to MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) dramatically increased the rates of
sulfoxidation, giving a second-order rate constant of 9.2 M–1 s–1 for DBS.[36] We next
sought to extend our study on the influence of anionicdonors and
determine whether a correlation with reactivity and the nature of
the axial donorcould be made. Investigations were initiated by examining
the reactivity of the fluoride anion. Addition of Bu4N+F– (TBAF) to MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) in the presence of excess DMS as substrate was monitored in CH2Cl2 at 25 °C (Scheme 1). The UV–vis spectra are shown in Figure 1a and reveal isosbesticconversion of the MnV-oxocomplex to the axially ligated complex [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(F)]−, with a split Soret band at 428 and 471
nm. As previously observed, there is little change in the UV–vis
spectrum for MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) upon addition of
F–, but splitting in the Soret region of the corresponding
[MnIII(TBP8Cz)(F)]− complex
is clearly seen in Figure 1b.[35,36] A related complex (Et4N)[MnIII(TBP8Cz)(Cl)] was crystallographically characterized and exhibited a similar
splitting in the Soret band.[37,41] With the addition of
excess TBAF, the OAT reaction was complete in 1.5 h, and analysis
by GC-FID revealed DMSO as the major oxidation product (85%). In comparison,
the oxidation of DMS by the five-coordinate MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) is much slower, taking over 17 h for completion.
Scheme 1
Oxidation of Thioether and Phosphine Substrates
by [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(F)]−
Figure 1
(a) UV–vis spectral changes (0–1.5
h) for the reaction
of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) + Bu4N+F– (6 equiv) (419, 634 nm) with excess DMS to give
[MnIII(TBP8Cz)(F)]− (428,
471, 680 nm) in CH2Cl2 at 25 °C. (b) UV–vis
spectral titration of MnIII(TBP8Cz) (435, 685
nm) (blue line) with Bu4N+F– (0–1 equiv) to give [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(F)]− (430, 472, 681 nm) in CH2Cl2 at 25 °C.
An alternate O-atom acceptor, PPh3, showed similar reactivity,
resulting in the rapid conversion of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(F)]− to [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(F)]−. The 31P NMR spectrum (Figure S1) of the reaction mixture identified OPPh3 as the major product in 89% yield (Scheme 1). Thus, the MnV(O) complex, in the presence of TBAF,
reacts rapidly and quantitatively with both thioether and phosphine
O-atom acceptors to give sulfoxide or phosphine oxide products via
a formal OAT process.(a) UV–vis spectral changes (0–1.5
h) for the reaction
of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) + Bu4N+F– (6 equiv) (419, 634 nm) with excess DMS to give
[MnIII(TBP8Cz)(F)]− (428,
471, 680 nm) in CH2Cl2 at 25 °C. (b) UV–vis
spectral titration of MnIII(TBP8Cz) (435, 685
nm) (blue line) with Bu4N+F– (0–1 equiv) to give [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(F)]− (430, 472, 681 nm) in CH2Cl2 at 25 °C.
Dependence of OAT Rates
on Fluoride Concentration
In
earlier work we showed that the rates of H-atom abstraction by MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) with C–H substrates depended
on the concentration of added TBAF.[35] A
plot of pseudo-first-order rate constants (kobs) versus [TBAF] for two different C–H substrates
gave a saturation curve that was successfully modeled as a 1:1 binding
equilibrium.[35] In the present study, the
rates of sulfoxidation of DBS under pseudo-first-order conditions
were similarly monitored by UV–vis, and the concentration of
TBAF was varied. Plots of the absorbance associated with the decay
and growth of the MnV and MnIIIcomplexes, respectively,
were well-fit to a single exponential kinetic model (Figure S2). The resulting kobs values were plotted versus [F–] (Figure 2a) and exhibit saturation behavior, indicative of
a rapid pre-equilibrium for the binding of F– prior
to the rate-determining step. A double reciprocal plot (1/kobs versus 1/[F–]total) (Figure 2b) reveals good linearity, with
a best fit that gives a binding constant of K(F–) = 115 ± 4 M–1. This value
is in good agreement with the binding constants found previously for
fluoride anion and the MnV(O) complex in reactions with
C–H substrates (163 ± 7 and 191 ± 10 M–1).[35] These results provide strong evidence
that addition of excess F– leads to the formation
of a six-coordinate MnV(O) complex with the fluoride ligated
relatively weakly trans to the oxo group.
Figure 2
(a) Dependence
of the kobs values on
the concentration of Bu4N+F– for the reaction of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) + DBS (270
equiv) in CH2Cl2 at 25 °C. (b) Double-reciprocal
plot of 1/kobs versus 1/[F–] (blue circles) and best fit line (black).
(a) Dependence
of the kobs values on
the concentration of Bu4N+F– for the reaction of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) + DBS (270
equiv) in CH2Cl2 at 25 °C. (b) Double-reciprocal
plot of 1/kobs versus 1/[F–] (blue circles) and best fit line (black).
Resonance Raman Spectroscopy of the Six-coordinate MnV(O) Complexes
The binding of X– to MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) can be described according to the simple
equilibrium in eq 4:The six-coordinate
complexes were examined
by resonance Raman spectroscopy for X = F–, N3–, and OCN–. Excess X– was added to push the equilibrium in eq 4 to favor the six-coordinate complexes in CH2Cl2. Frozen solution samples were excited with the 413.2 nm krypton-ion
excitation line at 77 K. A Mn–O vibrational mode for the five-coordinate
MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) starting complex was identified
at 981 cm–1, which downshifts to 939 cm–1 upon 18O substitution (Figure S3). This 42 cm–1 shift is in good agreement with
diatomic harmonic oscillator predictions as well as previously published
results.[42] The spectra for the F–, N3–, and OCN– complexes
are shown in Figure 3, together with the five-coordinate
starting material. The Mn–O mode clearly downshifts by 5 cm−1 to 976 cm–1 relative to the starting
complex. The identity of the peak at 976 cm–1 was
verified using 18O labeling for the F– and N3– complexes (Figures S4 and S5). These results provide strong evidence
that the anionicdonors are coordinated trans to
the terminal oxo ligand, thereby inducing a subtle weakening of the
Mn–O vibrational mode. Similar effects on the metal-oxo stretch
were seen upon variation of trans axial donors in
both heme and nonheme FeIV(O) complexes.[15,43,44]
Figure 3
Low-frequency resonance Raman spectra of 16O [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− where X = no
ligand, F−, N3−, or
OCN−. The resonances near 900 cm–1 were used to scale the spectra. Data were collected using a 413.2
nm krypton-ion laser line.
Low-frequency resonance Raman spectra of 16O [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− where X = no
ligand, F−, N3−, or
OCN−. The resonances near 900 cm–1 were used to scale the spectra. Data were collected using a 413.2
nm krypton-ion laser line.
Kinetic Studies of OAT for a Series of Anionic Axial Donors
A broad series of anionic axial ligands (X−),
in conjunction with two thioether substrates (DMS and DBS), were employed
for kinetic studies (Scheme 2). An example
of the UV–vis spectral changes observed for these OAT reactions
is shown in Figure 4, where X = N3–. Good isosbestic behavior is seen, and the final
spectrum matches that for [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(N3)]−. Plots of absorbance versus time for
the decay of the MnV(O) complex (634 nm) and the appearance
of the MnIII(N3–) complex
(685 nm) are shown in the inset, Figure 4.
These plots, along with the plots for the other axial donors, were
well fit by a single exponential model, consistent with the mechanism
shown in Scheme 2. The resulting fits yielded
pseudo-first-order rate constants (kobs), which were found to be linearly dependent on substrate concentration
(Figure 5). The best-fit lines of kobs versus [substrate] yielded second-order rate constants
(k) (Table 1) for the different
axial donors.
Scheme 2
Kinetic Model for
OAT to Thioether Substrates
Figure 4
UV–vis spectral changes for the reaction of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(N3)]− (9 μM)
(419, 634 nm) with DMS (4.0 mM) in CH2Cl2 at
25 °C. Inset: changes in absorbance versus time for the growth
of [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(N3)]− (685 nm) (open red circle) and the decay of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(N3)]− (634 nm) (open blue
square) together with best fits (solid black line).
Figure 5
(a) Plots of kobs versus concentration
of DBS for X– = CN– (solid blue
triangle), F– (solid red circle), and SCN– (solid green diamond). Inset: expanded region from 0 to 0.05 M.
(b) Plots of kobs versus concentration
of DMS for X– = F– (solid red
circle), N3– (solid purple diamond),
OCN– (solid blue square) and NO3– (solid green triangle). Inset: expanded region from
0 to 0.045 M.
Table 1
Second-Order
Rate Constants for OAT
to Thioether Substrates
axial ligand
substrate
k (M–1 s–1)
k[MnV(O)(X)]−/k[MnV(O)]
nonea,b
DBS
3.8 × 10–4
CNa,c
DBS
9.2 ± 0.3
24,000
F
DBS
0.63 ± 0.02
1700
SCN
DBS
(1.5 ± 0.1) × 10–4
0.4
noneb
DMS
(2.0 ± 0.2) × 10–3
F
DMS
2.3 ± 0.3
1100
N3
DMS
0.14 ± 0.01
70
OCN
DMS
(2.9 ± 0.3) × 10–3
1.5
NO3
DMS
(1.5 ± 0.1) × 10–3
0.75
In toluene.
Ref (40).
Ref (36).
As can be seen from Table 1, there is a remarkable enhancement in OAT reactivity for the MnV(O) complex in the presence of anionicdonors. The second-order
rate constant for F– reveals a dramatic rate enhancement
of 1100-fold in the oxidation of DMScompared to the five-coordinate
MnV(O) complex. A similar rate enhancement (1700) is seen
for the oxidation of DBS. Addition of CN– as the
axial donor has an even more dramatic effect, revealing a rate enhancement
of 24,000 for DBS oxidation by the [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(CN)]− complex.Further examination of
the other anionic axial donors in Table 1 reveals
some important trends. The addition of
azide (N3–) leads to a 70-fold rate enhancement
over the five-coordinate complex in the sulfoxidation of DMS. The
cyanate (OCN–) anion gives a more modest increase
of only 1.5 times for reaction with DMS, and the nitrate (NO3–) anion showed essentially no influence. The thiocyanate
(SCN–) anion also has little effect over the reaction
rate with DBS as substrate. Taken together, the kinetic data indicate
the following trend regarding the influence of the anionicdonors
on the rate of OAT: none ≈ SCN– ≈
NO3– < OCN– <
N3– < F– ≪
CN–. This trend is supported by our DFT calculations
and suggests a possible structural explanation for the relative influence
of X on the reactivity of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz) (vide infra).UV–vis spectral changes for the reaction of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(N3)]− (9 μM)
(419, 634 nm) with DMS (4.0 mM) in CH2Cl2 at
25 °C. Inset: changes in absorbance versus time for the growth
of [MnIII(TBP8Cz)(N3)]− (685 nm) (open red circle) and the decay of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(N3)]− (634 nm) (open blue
square) together with best fits (solid black line).(a) Plots of kobs versus concentration
of DBS for X– = CN– (solid blue
triangle), F– (solid red circle), and SCN– (solid green diamond). Inset: expanded region from 0 to 0.05 M.
(b) Plots of kobs versus concentration
of DMS for X– = F– (solid red
circle), N3– (solid purple diamond),
OCN– (solid blue square) and NO3– (solid green triangle). Inset: expanded region from
0 to 0.045 M.In toluene.Ref (40).Ref (36).
Influence of para-Substituents on the Reactivity
of Thioanisole Derivatives
The reactive cyanide-ligated [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(CN)]− complex was
chosen for further study with a series of p-X-C6H4SCH3 derivatives (Scheme 3). The oxidation of C6H5SCH3 proceeds in good yield (84%) to give the mono-oxygenated
sulfoxide product, with 71% of the 18O label in [MnV(18O)(TBP8Cz)(CN)]− transferring to the sulfur atom.[36] The
reactions between the p-X-substitutedthioanisole
derivatives and [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(CN)]− were monitored by UV–vis spectroscopy, and good isosbestic
behavior for the conversion of the MnV starting material
to the [MnIII(CN)]− product was seen
for all substrates. The resulting pseudo-first-order rate constants
(kX) for the different para-substituted derivatives were used to construct the Hammett plot
shown in Figure 6. For the electron-donating
substituents, there is a good linear correlation with a clear negative
slope of rho (ρ) = −1.29. This trend is easily explained
by a mechanism involving electrophilic attack of the oxo group of
the MnV(O) complex on the sulfurcenter of the thioanisole
derivatives. A negative ρ value was also seen for H-atom abstraction
by the five-coordinate MnV(O) complex with a series of p-substituted phenols.[45] These
data indicate that the anionic, six-coordinate MnV(O) complex
maintains significant electrophiliccharacter. However, the electron-withdrawing p-COOMe, p-CN, and p-NO2 substituents lead to a substantial increase in reaction rate and a positive rho value of ρ
= +1.22. Such a “V-shaped” Hammett plot suggests a distinct
change in mechanism for the electron-poor substrates. For comparison,
a V-shaped Hammett plot was observed for a related MnV(imido)(corrole)
complex, also implicating a mechanistic switch.[46] The generality of this change in mechanism for the six-coordinate
anionic MnV(O) complexes was confirmed by examining the
fluoride-ligated [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(F)]−. Reaction of this complex with p-X-C6H4SCH3 derivatives also revealed a clear V-shaped
Hammett plot (Figure S14).
Scheme 3
OAT to para-Substituted Thioanisole Derivatives
Figure 6
Hammett plot for the reaction of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(CN)]− and para-X-substituted
thioanisole derivatives.
A possible
explanation for the V-shaped Hammett plots comes from consideration
of the contributing resonance structures shown in Figure 7. The quinoid-type resonance forms may be partly
stabilized by the electron-withdrawing p-COOMe, p-CN, and p-NO2 substituents.
Evidence for the contribution of a similar quinoid-type resonance
form in a p-nitrophenylthiolate–NiIIcomplex was observed by X-ray crystallography.[47] The quinoid-type resonance form shown in Figure 7 generates partial positive charge on the sulfurcenter, making these relatively electron-poor substrates potentially electrophilic in nature. A different mechanism for sulfoxidation
could then result for the p-COOMe, p-CN, and p-NO2 substrates.
Figure 7
Resonance structures for electron-withdrawing para-subsituted thioanisole derivatives.
The
two possible mechanistic scenarios are shown in Scheme 4. Pathway A corresponds to the electron-donating para-X substituents and shows the sulfoxidation reaction
formally broken into electron-transfer and O–S bond formation
steps. The redox potentials of the thioether substrates (E°ox = 1.2–1.6 V vs SCE) as compared to the
parent five-coordinate MnV(O) complex (E1/2 = −0.05 V vs SCE)[37] indicate that pure outer-sphere ET between ArSR and the six-coordinate,
anionic MnV(O) complexes is likely to be thermodynamically
highly disfavored. Thus, a more reasonable mechanism, which we favor,
involves a single transition state with contributions from both the
ET and S–O bond formation steps formally depicted in Pathway
A. The rates for the electron-donating substituents correlate with
the trend expected from a significant contribution of the ET process,
which should get slower as the redox potential of the thioether increases.
In contrast, the electron-withdrawing substituents may exhibit negligible
contribution from electron-transfer because of their very high redox
potentials. For these substrates, the quinoid-type resonance structure
can enhance the rate of S–O bond formation, taking advantage
of the ability of the anionic [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− (X = CN– or F–) complex to serve as a potential weak nucleophile.[48,49] Thus, for pathway B, the transition state is dominated by S–O
bond formation. This barrier would be lower for more electron-withdrawing
substrates, providing an explanation for the positive ρ value
and the V-shaped Hammett plot seen in Figure 6.
Scheme 4
Possible Mechanistic Pathways for Electron-Donating (Pathway
A) and
Electron-Withdrawing (Pathway B) para-Substituted
Thioanisole Derivatives
Hammett plot for the reaction of [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(CN)]− and para-X-substitutedthioanisole derivatives.Resonance structures for electron-withdrawing para-subsituted thioanisole derivatives.The cationiccomplex MnV(O)(TBP8Cz•+) was previously prepared by some of
us and, to our knowledge, is the only example of an MnV(O)(π-radical cation) complex. This cationiccomplex functioned as an electrophilic oxidant toward phosphine
and thioether substrates and was an ideal candidate for comparison
of its OAT reactivity with the anionic axially ligated
MnV(O) complexes. The MnV(O)(π-radical
cation) complex was generated by chemical oxidation of the neutral
MnV(O) starting material with the one-electron oxidant
[(4-BrC6H4)3N•+](SbCl6–) (Scheme 5). Isosbestic behavior was observed for the reactions with the p-X-substitutedthioanisole derivatives, and in this case
the two-electron reduced product of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz•+) is the MnIV complex [MnIV(TBP8Cz)]+, as expected following OAT. The
resulting Hammett plot of log(kX/kH) versus σ values for the para-X derivatives is shown in Figure 8. A strong
linear correlation with a slope ρ = −1.40 is found throughout
the range of para-X derivatives, in stark contrast
to the V-shaped Hammett plot seen for the anionic [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− (X = CN– or F–). A single mechanism involving electrophilic attack
of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz•+) (Pathway
A) is inferred. These findings provide strong support for the conclusion
that there is a mechanistic switch for the CN– and
F– complexes and the electron-poor substrates (Pathway
B), and it is the anionic nature of the CN– and F– species that likely facilitates the opening
of this unique reaction channel.
Scheme 5
Generation and OAT Reaction of the
Cationic [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz+•)]
Complex
Figure 8
Hammett plot for the
reaction of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz+•) with para-X-substituted
thioanisole derivatives in CH2Cl2.
Hammett plot for the
reaction of MnV(O)(TBP8Cz+•) with para-X-substitutedthioanisole derivatives in CH2Cl2.
Density Functional Theory (DFT) Calculations
Computational
studies were undertaken to help explain the trend in reactivity for
the different anionic axial ligands. Calculations were performed at
RIJCOSX-B3LYP/LANLDZ/6-31G level of theory, and the optimized geometries
revealed a variation in MnV–X bond distances that
were used for a qualitative comparison of the binding interactions
for the various axial (X–) donors. The TBP groups
were replaced with H-atoms on the Cz ligand to facilitate the computations.
The calculations were performed on the singlet state only for the
MnV ion, which has been shown to be the ground state in
previous calculations[35,40] and which is consistent with
XAS measurements for the CN– complex.[36] The optimized geometries for the six-coordinate
F– and CN– structures were calculated
previously[35] but were repeated here for
comparative purposes. The calculated structures for 1[MnV(O)(H8Cz)(X)]− (X = F–, CN–) revealed Mn–X distances (Table 2) indicating a binding interaction. The azide and
cyanate anions also remained bound to the metal following optimization
but exhibit longer bond distances. Interestingly, the nitrate anion
binds only very weakly, and thiocyanate (not shown in Table 2) dissociates completely from the metal upon geometry
optimization. Both NO3– and SCN– anions showed no influence on the rate of OAT. The computational
results show that the MnV–X distance correlates
well with the trend in reactivity for the axial donors, in which the
shorter distances seen for CN– and F– correspond to large rate enhancements, whereas the other ligands
exhibit either weak or no influence on OAT rates.
Table 2
Select Bond Distances (Å) from
DFT Calculations
none
CN–
F–
N3–
OCN–
NO3–
MnV–O
1.549
1.568
1.568
1.568
1.561
1.557
MnV–X
–
2.146
1.931
2.354
2.420
2.518
Conclusions
Addition of anionic
axial donors (X–) to an MnV(O) corrolazine
results in binding to the MnV center.
Resonance Raman spectroscopy confirms a subtle weakening of the MnV–O triple bond upon addition of the X– ligand, providing strong evidence for coordination of X– in a position trans to the terminal oxo group.
The axial donors CN– and F– lead
to dramatic increases in OAT reactivity to thioether substrates, and
N3– also shows a strong effect. The OCN–, NO3–, and SCN– anions, however, exhibit little or no influence on OAT. These trends
in reactivity correlate well with the trend in the DFT-derived MnV–X distances. A Hammett analysis with a range of p-X-C6H4SCH3 derivatives
revealed an unusual V-shaped Hammett plot for [MnV(O)(TBP8Cz)(X)]− (X = CN– or F–) complexes, indicating a distinct change in mechanism
for OAT to the thioether substrates. This Hammett behavior strongly
contrasts the linear plot seen for the cationiccomplex MnV(O)(TBP8Cz•+). These findings suggest
a novel bifurcated mechanistic scenario in which the axially ligated
anioniccomplexes can function in either a purely electrophiliccapacity
or in an initial nucleophilic manner when strong electron-withdrawing
substituents are present on the thioanisole derivatives. Our results
suggest that axial ligation is a key factor in the OAT reactivity
of MnV(O) complexes, and the addition of the appropriate
axial donorcan be a good strategy for dramatically increasing OAT
reactivity. Even though the axially ligated complexes bear an overall
negative charge, they function as more powerful, electrophilic oxidizing
agents as compared to the nonligated, neutral MnV(O) precursor
complex. With the strong electron-withdrawing p-X
substituents on the thioanisole derivatives, the nucleophilic properties
of the anionic MnV(O) complexes provide a further boost
to their reactivity. These new mechanistic insights should help in
our understanding of axial ligand effects in heme enzymes as well
as in the potential design of new synthetic oxidation catalysts.
Authors: Pannee Leeladee; Regina A Baglia; Katharine A Prokop; Reza Latifi; Sam P de Visser; David P Goldberg Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Heather M Neu; Jieun Jung; Regina A Baglia; Maxime A Siegler; Kei Ohkubo; Shunichi Fukuzumi; David P Goldberg Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yan Li; Suhashini Handunneththige; Jin Xiong; Yisong Guo; Marat R Talipov; Dong Wang Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Roy E Schreiber; Hagai Cohen; Gregory Leitus; Sharon G Wolf; Ang Zhou; Lawrence Que; Ronny Neumann Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Evan E Joslin; Jan Paulo T Zaragoza; Regina A Baglia; Maxime A Siegler; David P Goldberg Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 5.165