Li Ming Wen1,2,3, Chris Rissel2,3, Huilan Xu1, Sarah Taki1,2,3, Limin Buchanan1,3, Karen Bedford1, Philayrath Phongsavan2, Louise A Baur2,3,4. 1. Health Promotion, Population Health Research and Evaluation Hub, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in the Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
Importance: There is limited information as to whether telephone or short message service (SMS) support is effective in improving infant feeding practices and tummy time and reducing screen time. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of either nurse-led telephone or SMS support in improving infant feeding practices and tummy time and reducing screen time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was part of a 2-year, 3-group parallel, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 23, 2017, to November 30, 2018, among 1155 women in the third trimester of pregnancy in New South Wales, Australia. It reports the main outcomes at 6 and 12 months of child age. All analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat principle. Interventions: The intervention consisted of staged information booklets mailed to the intervention groups, each followed by either a nurse-led telephone support session or SMS intervention, antenatally and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 months after birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were infant feeding practices at both 6 and 12 months and tummy time at 6 months. The secondary outcome was screen time at 12 months. Results:Of 1155 mothers, 947 (82%; mean [SD] age, 32.5 [5.0] years) completed follow-up surveys at 6 months; 920 mothers (80%) completed follow-up surveys at 12 months. Compared with the control group, telephone support led to higher odds of appropriate timing of introducing solid foods (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.68 [95% CI, 1.22-2.32]), cup use (AOR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.12-2.13]), and early-start tummy time (AOR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.18-2.25]) at 6 months and higher odds of having no screen time (AOR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.28-2.53]) and no bottle at bedtime (AOR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.23-2.42]) at 12 months. Use of SMS also led to higher odds than the control group of having no screen time (AOR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.08-1.52]) and having no bottle at bedtime (AOR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.10-1.51]) at 12 months. No significant differences were found in breastfeeding rates between the telephone support, SMS support, and control groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Both the nurse-led telephone support and SMS interventions were effective in reducing screen time and bottle use at bedtime. Telephone support was also effective in promoting the appropriate timing of the introduction of solid foods, early-start tummy time, and cup use. Trial Registration: http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001470482.
RCT Entities:
Importance: There is limited information as to whether telephone or short message service (SMS) support is effective in improving infant feeding practices and tummy time and reducing screen time. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of either nurse-led telephone or SMS support in improving infant feeding practices and tummy time and reducing screen time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was part of a 2-year, 3-group parallel, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 23, 2017, to November 30, 2018, among 1155 women in the third trimester of pregnancy in New South Wales, Australia. It reports the main outcomes at 6 and 12 months of child age. All analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat principle. Interventions: The intervention consisted of staged information booklets mailed to the intervention groups, each followed by either a nurse-led telephone support session or SMS intervention, antenatally and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 months after birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were infant feeding practices at both 6 and 12 months and tummy time at 6 months. The secondary outcome was screen time at 12 months. Results: Of 1155 mothers, 947 (82%; mean [SD] age, 32.5 [5.0] years) completed follow-up surveys at 6 months; 920 mothers (80%) completed follow-up surveys at 12 months. Compared with the control group, telephone support led to higher odds of appropriate timing of introducing solid foods (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.68 [95% CI, 1.22-2.32]), cup use (AOR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.12-2.13]), and early-start tummy time (AOR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.18-2.25]) at 6 months and higher odds of having no screen time (AOR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.28-2.53]) and no bottle at bedtime (AOR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.23-2.42]) at 12 months. Use of SMS also led to higher odds than the control group of having no screen time (AOR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.08-1.52]) and having no bottle at bedtime (AOR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.10-1.51]) at 12 months. No significant differences were found in breastfeeding rates between the telephone support, SMS support, and control groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Both the nurse-led telephone support and SMS interventions were effective in reducing screen time and bottle use at bedtime. Telephone support was also effective in promoting the appropriate timing of the introduction of solid foods, early-start tummy time, and cup use. Trial Registration: http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001470482.
Authors: Linda C Pugh; Janet R Serwint; Kevin D Frick; Joy P Nanda; Phyllis W Sharps; Diane L Spatz; Renee A Milligan Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Rachel S Gross; Alan L Mendelsohn; Michelle B Gross; Roberta Scheinmann; Mary Jo Messito Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar; Seema Mihrshahi; Li Ming Wen; Sarah Taki; Greer Bennett; Louise A Baur; Chris Rissel Journal: Trials Date: 2018-09-15 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Li Ming Wen; Chris Rissel; Huilan Xu; Sarah Taki; Wendy Smith; Karen Bedford; Alison J Hayes; Philayrath Phongsavan; Judy M Simpson; Miranda J Shaw; Renee Moreton; Louise A Baur Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar; Huilan Xu; Chris Rissel; Louise Baur; Sarah Taki; Seema Mihrshahi; Li Ming Wen Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 6.055
Authors: Li Ming Wen; Huilan Xu; Chris Rissel; Erin Kerr; Limin Buchanan; Sarah Taki; Philayrath Phongsavan; Reuel Kangjie Chua; Myna Hua; Karen Wardle; Lisa Simone; Alison Hayes; Louise A Baur Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-05-27
Authors: Sarah Marshall; Sarah Taki; Penny Love; Yvonne Laird; Marianne Kearney; Nancy Tam; Louise A Baur; Chris Rissel; Li Ming Wen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar; Swathi Ekambareshwar; Seema Mihrshahi; Li Ming Wen; Louise A Baur; Rachel Laws; Sarah Taki; Chris Rissel Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Li Ming Wen; Huilan Xu; Danielle Jawad; Limin Buchanan; Chris Rissel; Philayrath Phongsavan; Louise A Baur; Sarah Taki Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar; Sarah Taki; Seema Mihrshahi; Louise Baur; Li Ming Wen; Chris Rissel Journal: Health Promot J Austr Date: 2021-12-08
Authors: Chelsea L Kracht; Leanne M Redman; Patrick H Casey; Rebecca A Krukowski; Aline Andres Journal: Child Obes Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 2.992