Literature DB >> 32281054

Reading and interpreting reviews for health professionals: a practical review.

Michele Antonelli1,2,3, Fabio Firenzuoli4, Carlo Salvarani5,6, Gian Franco Gensini7, Davide Donelli8,4,6.   

Abstract

Literature reviews can be directly used by clinicians and other health professionals to support many decision-making processes. This review aims to offer health professionals an essential practical guide to critically evaluate and properly understand results of review articles published in the scientific literature. An evidence-based methodological review with step-by-step theoretical concepts and practical suggestions was developed. Key steps of this guide are: to consider the topic and the research question (a), to check the review type (b), to evaluate the methodology (with a keen focus on review guidelines, search strategy and study-selection process, evaluation of the quality and certainty of included evidence, and statistical analysis) (c), and to define the real impact of review results (d). This guide offers a description of essential and easy-to-apply key steps which can help health professionals to evaluate the reliability and implications of a literature review, and to select the latest high-quality scientific evidence to keep updated with.

Keywords:  Evidence-based medicine; Methodology; Review; Scientific literacy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32281054     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02334-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  30 in total

1.  From outdated to updated, keeping clinical guidelines valid.

Authors:  Eloise Clark; Edward F Donovan; Pamela Schoettker
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 2.  Evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Meta-analysis Metastasis.

Authors:  Joshua D Wallach
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Joaquim Radua
Journal:  Evid Based Ment Health       Date:  2018-07-13

5.  The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Promoting continence--continence advice.

Authors:  A Turner
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs Home Care       Date:  1989-03

7.  Why Systematic Review rather than Narrative Review?

Authors:  Chi-Un Pae
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks.

Authors:  Marina Krnic Martinic; Dawid Pieper; Angelina Glatt; Livia Puljak
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach.

Authors:  Sara Khangura; Kristin Konnyu; Rob Cushman; Jeremy Grimshaw; David Moher
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-10

10.  New evidence pyramid.

Authors:  M Hassan Murad; Noor Asi; Mouaz Alsawas; Fares Alahdab
Journal:  Evid Based Med       Date:  2016-06-23
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Forest Volatile Organic Compounds and Their Effects on Human Health: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Michele Antonelli; Davide Donelli; Grazia Barbieri; Marco Valussi; Valentina Maggini; Fabio Firenzuoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.