| Literature DB >> 32280358 |
Nor Aishah Emi1, Wan Ying Gan1, Zalilah Mohd Shariff1, Azriyanti Anuar Zaini2, Nurainul Hana Shamsuddin3, Mahenderan Appukutty4, Geeta Appannah1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify a dietary pattern (DP) characterised mainly by high intakes of free sugar and other nutrients hypothesised to be associated with obesity such as dietary energy density (DED), percentage of energy from total fat and fibre density in adolescents from three southern states of Peninsular Malaysia, and its associations with cardiometabolic risk factors.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiometabolic risk factors; Childhood obesity; Dietary patterns; Dyslipidemia; Malaysian adolescent
Year: 2020 PMID: 32280358 PMCID: PMC7140313 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-020-00447-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Characteristics of study adolescents and their parents recruited from three southern states of Peninsular Malaysia
| Characteristics | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Total | ||
| School location | ||||
| Urban | 147 (49.0) | 287 (45.3) | 434 (46.5) | 0.29 |
| Rural | 153 (51.0) | 346 (54.7) | 499 (53.5) | |
| School size | ||||
| Small (≤100 students) | 19 (6.3) | 39 (6.2) | 58 (6.2) | 0.93 |
| Medium (101–199 students) | 109 (36.3) | 238 (37.6) | 347 (37.2) | |
| Large (≥200 students) | 172 (57.3) | 356 (56.2) | 528 (56.6) | |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Malay | 262 (87.3) | 552 (87.2) | 814 (87.2) | 0.95 |
| Chinese | 21 (7.0) | 42 (6.6) | 63 (6.8) | |
| Indian | 14 (4.7) | 30 (4.7) | 44 (4.7) | |
| Others | 3 (1.0) | 9 (1.4) | 12 (1.3) | |
| Parental Income, | ||||
| Below median | 159 (88.3) | 372 (88.8) | 531 (88.6) | 0.89 |
| Above median | 21 (11.7) | 47 (11.2) | 68 (11.4) | |
| Educational level of mother, | ||||
| No formal education/Primary | 23 (9.5) | 68 (11.8) | 91 (11.1) | 0.58 |
| Secondary school | 179 (74.3) | 425 (73.7) | 604 (73.8) | |
| Higher institution | 39 (16.2) | 84 (14.6) | 123 (15.0) | |
| Physical activity total score, | 2.77 (±0.72) | 2.40 (±0.57) | 2.52 (±0.64) | < 0.001 |
| ‘High sugar, high fibre, high DED and low fat’ DP z-score, | −0.15 (±1.14) | 0.06 (±1.40) | 0.00 (±1.33) | 0.08 |
aMedian monthly household income (RM 5, 228) based on Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey 2016. p < 0.05 considered significant. DED Dietary Energy Density, DP Dietary Pattern
Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics of adolescents aged 13 years recruited from three southern states of Peninsular Malaysia
| Characteristics | Male | Female | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||
| Height (cm), | 155.4 (±8.5) | 153.0 (±5.9) | 153.8 (±6.9) | < 0.001 |
| Weight (kg), | 49.8 (±14.6) | 48.6 (±13.1) | 49.0 (±13.6) | 0.20 |
| BMI (kg/m2), | 20.5 (±5.3) | 20.6 (±5.0) | 20.6 (±5.1) | 0.65 |
| BMI z-score, | 0.37 (±1.57) | 0.26 (±1.48) | 0.29 (±1.51) | 0.30 |
| WC (cm), | 66.7 (±13.5) | 65.0 (±10.8) | 65.5 (±11.7) | 0.05 |
| WC z-score, | 0.10 (±1.15) | −0.05 (±0.92) | 0.00 (±1.00) | 0.03 |
| Fasting Blood Glucose (mmol/L), | 4.93 (±0.39) | 4.83 (±0.42) | 4.86 (±0.42) | 0.02 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L), | 4.36 (±0.72) | 4.71 (±0.79) | 4.60 (±0.79) | < 0.001 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L), | 1.48 (±0.32) | 1.58 (±0.32) | 1.55 (±0.33) | 0.003 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L), | 2.47 (±0.63) | 2.73 (±0.70) | 2.65 (±0.69) | < 0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L), | 0.88 (±0.54) | 0.89 (±0.38) | 0.89 (±0.44) | 0.78 |
| Serum insulin (uIU/mL), | 14.14 (±9.07) | 13.96 (±8.08) | 14.02 (±8.38) | 0.83 |
| HOMA-IR (unit), | 3.14 (±2.20) | 3.03 (±1.83) | 3.06 (±1.95) | 0.55 |
| Overweight/obesity, | 103 (34.6) | 198 (31.4) | 301 (32.4) | 0.11 |
| Abdominal obesity, | 35 (11.8) | 73 (11.6) | 108 (11.6) | 0.92 |
| Dyslipidaemia, | 22 (14.3) | 99 (28.0) | 121 (23.9) | 0.001a |
| Plausible dietary reporter, | 54 (31.4) | 117 (28.5) | 171 (29.2) | 0.11 |
aFisher’s exact test. Overweight and obesity were defined using BMI z-scores of more than one and two standard deviations above the WHO growth standard median, respectively. WC z-score was computed and abdominal obesity was defined according to the Malaysian WC centile curves of equal or more than the 90th centiles [28]. Dyslipidaemia during childhood and adolescence was determined when the level of total cholesterol was greater than or equal to 5.2 mmol/L or their LDL-C level was greater than or equal to 3.4 mmol/L [30]. Plausible dietary reporter was adolescents with the ratio of energy intake to basal metabolic rate between 1.09 to 2.21 estimated using the Goldberg equation [22]. BMI Body Mass Index, WC Waist Circumference, HDL-C High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, LDL-C Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, HOMA-IR Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance
Unadjusted associations [odds ratio (95% CI)] between ‘high sugar, high fibre, high energy density and low fat’ DP z-scores and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents aged 13 years recruited from three southern states of Peninsular Malaysia
| Cardiometabolic risk factors | Male | Female | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd tertile vs 1st tertile | 3rd tertile vs 1st tertile | 2nd tertile vs 1st tertile | 3rd tertile vs 1st tertile | 2nd tertile vs 1st tertile | 3rd tertile vs 1st tertile | |
| Overweight/Obese, | 0.9 (0.4,1.9) | 0.7 (0.3,1.6) | 0.9 (0.5,1.5) | 0.8 (0.5,1.4) | 0.9 (0.6,1.4) | 0.8 (0.5,1.2) |
| Abdominal Obesity, | 0.8 (0.3,2.7) | 1.5 (0.5,4.5) | 0.9 (0.5,1.9) | 0.4 (0.19,1.0) | 0.9(0.5,1.7) | 0.7(0.4,1.3) |
| Dyslipidaemia, | 0.7 (0.1,3.9) | 2.9 (0.8,10.9) | 1.9 (0.9,3.9) | 2.0 (0.9,4.2) | 1.7 (0.9,3.3) | 2.3* (1.2,4.3) |
| Elevated blood glucose (≥5.60 mmol/L), | 4.5 (0.4,45.7) | 8.1 (0.9,73.8) | 0.0 (0.0,0.0) | 0.9 (0.2,3.8) | 0.6 (0.1,2.5) | 2.0 (0.6,6.1) |
| Elevated total cholesterol (≥5.20 mmol/L), | 0.7 (0.1,3.9) | 2.9 (0.8,10.9) | 1.9 (0.9,3.9) | 2.0 (0.9,4.2) | 1.7 (0.9,3.3) | 2.3* (1.2,4.3) |
| Lower HDL-cholesterol level (≤1.03 mmol/L), | 0.7 (0.1,7.9) | 3.0 (0.5,17.9) | 0.3 (0.1,1.8) | 0.5 (0.1,2.3) | 0.4 (0.1,1.7) | 1.0 (0.4,3.1) |
| Elevated LDL-cholesterol (≥4.12 mmol/L), | 1.2 (0.4,3.1) | 2.1 (0.8,5.4) | 1.6 (0.9,3.1) | 1.6 (0.8,3.0) | 1.6 (0.9,2.6) | 1.8* (1.0,3.0) |
| Elevated triglycerides (≥1.70 mmol/L), | 0.7 (0.1,7.9) | 0.7 (0.1,7.9) | 2.7 (0.3,26.6) | 4.9 (0.6,42.7) | 1.4 (0.3,6.2) | 2.2 (0.5,8.8) |
| Elevated serum insulin (≥25.0 uIU/mL), | 1.4 (0.2,10.6) | 4.0 (0.7,22.1) | 0.6 (0.2,2.0) | 0.6 (0.2,2.1) | 0.8(0.8,2.1) | 1.2 (0.5,3.0) |
| Abnormal HOMA-IR level (≥4.0 unit), | 2.4 (0.7,22.1) | 4.1* (1.1,14.8) | 1.2 (0.6,2.5) | 0.9 (0.4,1.9) | 1.5 (0.8,2.8) | 1.4 (0.7,2.6) |
*p < 0.05 is considered significant. HDL-C High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, LDL-C Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, HOMA-IR Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance
Adjusted associations [odds ratio (95% CI)] between ‘high sugar, high fibre, high energy density and low fat’ DP z-scores and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents aged 13 years recruited from three southern states of Peninsular Malaysia
| Cardiometabolic risk factors* | Male, | Female, | Total, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd tertile vs 1st tertile | 3rd tertile vs 1st tertile | 2nd tertile vs 1st tertile | 3rd tertile vs 1st tertile | 2nd tertile vs 1st tertile | 3rd tertile vs 1st tertile | |
| Overweight/Obese, | 1.2 (0.5, 3.1) | 0.6 (0.2,1.8) | 1.0 (0.5,1.8) | 0.9 (0.5,1.6) | 1.0 (0.6,1.7) | 0.9 (0.5,1.4) |
| Abdominal Obesity, | 0.9 (0.2,4.3) | 0.9 (0.2,4.5) | 0.8 (0.3,1.8) | 0.5 (0.2,1.2) | 0.9 (0.4,1.9) | 0.7 (0.3,1.6) |
| Dyslipidaemia, | 0.9 (0.1,8.8) | 3.2 (0.5119.0) | 2.1 (0.9,4.6) | 2.2 (0.9,5.0) | 2.0 (0.9,4.2) | 2.7* (1.3,5.6) |
| Elevated blood glucose (≥5.60 mmol/L), | 0.0 (0.0,0.0) | 0.0 (0.0,0.0) | 0.0 (0.0,0.0) | 0.5 (0.1,4.2) | 1.0 (0.25.9) | 3.2 (0.7,15.4) |
| Elevated total cholesterol (≥5.20 mmol/L), | 0.9 (0.1,8.8) | 3.2 (0.5119.0) | 2.1 (0.9,4.6) | 2.2 (0.9,5.0) | 2.0 (0.9,4.2) | 2.7* (1.3,5.6) |
| Lower HDL-cholesterol level (≤1.03 mmol/L), | 0.0(0.0,0.0) | 1.2 (0.1,19.0) | 0.0 (0.0,0.0) | 0.5 (0.1,3.0) | 0.0 (0.0,0.0) | 1.2 (0.3,4.1) |
| Elevated LDL-cholesterol (≥4.12 mmol/L), | 1.5(0.4,5.2) | 3.2 (0.9,11.2) | 1.6 (0.8,3.3) | 1.5 (0.7,3.1) | 1.7 (0.9,3.0) | 1.9* (1.0,3.5) |
| Elevated triglycerides (≥1.70 mmol/L), | 0.0 (0.0,0.0) | 0.2 (0.0,31.7) | 1.6 (0.1,19.1) | 3.7 (0.4,37.1) | 0.6 (0.1,3.7) | 2.1 (0.4,9.8) |
| Elevated serum insulin (≥25.0 uIU/mL), | 1.1 (0.0,25.7) | 9.8 (0.4222.8) | 0.5 (0.1,2.2) | 0.6 (0.1,2.5) | 0.6 (0.2,2.0) | 1.2 (0.4,3.6) |
| Abnormal HOMA-IR level (≥4.0 unit), | 1.8 (0.3,12.0) | 4.6 (0.7,28.6) | 1.4 (0.6,3.4) | 0.9 (0.3,2.2) | 1.7 (0.8,3.6) | 1.3 (0.6,3.0) |
Model adjusted for school location, mother’s educational level, dietary misreporting, physical activity and BMI (for blood biomarker only) aModel adjusted for sex, school location, mother’s educational level, dietary misreporting, physical activity and BMI (for blood biomarker only). *p < 0.05 is considered significant. HDL-C High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, LDL-C Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, HOMA-IR Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance