Carter J Boyd1, Jason J Patel1, Edgar Soto1, Srikanth Kurapati2, Kimberly D Martin3, Timothy W King4. 1. School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 2. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 4. School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama; Division of Plastic Surgery, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama. Electronic address: twking@uab.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of research comparing journal articles that accrue numerous citations with those that accrue few citations over time. Understanding differences between journal articles can help direct investigators in designing and conducting their research. METHODS: Using advanced bibliometric tools, we queried four plastic surgery journals (Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and Microsurgery) for primary research articles published between 1998 and 2008 accruing zero or one citations with at least a 10-y lag time. Forty-seven articles were identified as low citation and were compared with an equal number of articles in the same journals that accrued the highest number of citations in the same period as high citation (HC). The data were analyzed using Student t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, chi-square tests, and Fisher exact tests. The level of significance was established at P < 0.05. RESULTS: When compared with the HC cohort, the low citation articles were more likely to be nonclinical (P < 0.001), have no plastic surgery authors (P = 0.0026), and focus on the field of microsurgery (P = 0.003). The HC cohort was more likely to have higher sample sizes (P = 0.0339), focus on aesthetic/cosmetic surgery (P = 0.003), have a higher number of other disciplines included on authorship (P < 0.001), references (P = 0.0451), manuscript pages (P < 0.001), and words in the abstract (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A small number of articles published in four plastic surgery journals were uncited during a 10-y period. There are qualitative and quantitative differences between highly and lowly cited articles in the plastic surgery literature. Investigators should consider these differences when designing and conducting studies. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of research comparing journal articles that accrue numerous citations with those that accrue few citations over time. Understanding differences between journal articles can help direct investigators in designing and conducting their research. METHODS: Using advanced bibliometric tools, we queried four plastic surgery journals (Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and Microsurgery) for primary research articles published between 1998 and 2008 accruing zero or one citations with at least a 10-y lag time. Forty-seven articles were identified as low citation and were compared with an equal number of articles in the same journals that accrued the highest number of citations in the same period as high citation (HC). The data were analyzed using Student t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, chi-square tests, and Fisher exact tests. The level of significance was established at P < 0.05. RESULTS: When compared with the HC cohort, the low citation articles were more likely to be nonclinical (P < 0.001), have no plastic surgery authors (P = 0.0026), and focus on the field of microsurgery (P = 0.003). The HC cohort was more likely to have higher sample sizes (P = 0.0339), focus on aesthetic/cosmetic surgery (P = 0.003), have a higher number of other disciplines included on authorship (P < 0.001), references (P = 0.0451), manuscript pages (P < 0.001), and words in the abstract (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A small number of articles published in four plastic surgery journals were uncited during a 10-y period. There are qualitative and quantitative differences between highly and lowly cited articles in the plastic surgery literature. Investigators should consider these differences when designing and conducting studies. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bibliometric; Citations; Literature analysis; Plastic surgery
Authors: Edward W Swanson; Devin T Miller; Srinivas M Susarla; Joseph Lopez; Denver M Lough; James W May; Richard J Redett Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: Michael T Chang; Zachary G Schwam; Christopher A Schutt; Emily M Kamen; Boris Paskhover Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 2.326
Authors: David Ouyang; David Sing; Sonia Shah; Jiaqi Hu; Claire Duvernoy; Robert A Harrington; Fatima Rodriguez Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2018-12
Authors: Joseph Lopez; Nicholas Calotta; Ankur Doshi; Ashwin Soni; Jacqueline Milton; James W May; Anthony P Tufaro Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Daniel G Leal; Maria Amelia Rodrigues; Ana Carolina B Tedesco; Fabio Xerfan Nahas; Lydia Masako Ferreira; Ana C W Roxo; Claudio Cardoso de Castro; Jose Horacio Aboudib Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: Cormac W Joyce; Kenneth M Joyce; George Rahmani; Stewart R Walsh; Sean M Carroll; Alan J Hussey; Jack L Kelly Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2015-02-06
Authors: John T Wilson; Carter J Boyd; Jared Halstrom; Aseel Dib; Kimberly Martin; Michael D Johnson Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 1.251
Authors: Marek A Hansdorfer; Sydney R Horen; Brandon E Alba; Jennifer N Akin; Amir H Dorafshar; Adan Z Becerra Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-03-26