Andrew B Rosenkrantz1, Ryan Chung2, Richard Duszak3. 1. Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016. Electronic address: Andrew.Rosenkrantz@nyumc.org. 2. Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016. 3. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize articles in popular general radiology journals that go uncited for a decade after publication. METHODS: Using the Web of Science database, we identified annual citation counts for 13,459 articles published in Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, and Academic Radiology between 1997 and 2006. From this article cohort, we then identified all original research articles that accrued zero citations within a decade of publication. A concurrent equal-sized cohort of most cited articles was created. Numerous characteristics of the uncited and most cited articles were identified and compared. RESULTS: Only 47 uncited articles went uncited for a decade after publication. When compared to the 47 most cited articles over that same window, the uncited articles were significantly (P < .05) less likely to have a clinical focus, include a nonradiologist author and authors from multiple institutions and multiple nations, report research funding support and statistically significant findings, and include punctuation marks in their titles. Compared to the most cited articles, uncited articles also had significantly (P < .05) fewer authors, abstract words, manuscript words, references, tables, figure parts, and pages, as well as smaller subject sample sizes. CONCLUSION: Of articles published in popular general radiology journals, only a very small number of original research investigations remained uncited a decade after publication. Given that citations reflect the impact of radiology research, this observation suggests that journals are appropriately selecting meaningful work. Investigators seeking to avoid futile publication might consider their research initiatives in light of these characteristics.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize articles in popular general radiology journals that go uncited for a decade after publication. METHODS: Using the Web of Science database, we identified annual citation counts for 13,459 articles published in Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, and Academic Radiology between 1997 and 2006. From this article cohort, we then identified all original research articles that accrued zero citations within a decade of publication. A concurrent equal-sized cohort of most cited articles was created. Numerous characteristics of the uncited and most cited articles were identified and compared. RESULTS: Only 47 uncited articles went uncited for a decade after publication. When compared to the 47 most cited articles over that same window, the uncited articles were significantly (P < .05) less likely to have a clinical focus, include a nonradiologist author and authors from multiple institutions and multiple nations, report research funding support and statistically significant findings, and include punctuation marks in their titles. Compared to the most cited articles, uncited articles also had significantly (P < .05) fewer authors, abstract words, manuscript words, references, tables, figure parts, and pages, as well as smaller subject sample sizes. CONCLUSION: Of articles published in popular general radiology journals, only a very small number of original research investigations remained uncited a decade after publication. Given that citations reflect the impact of radiology research, this observation suggests that journals are appropriately selecting meaningful work. Investigators seeking to avoid futile publication might consider their research initiatives in light of these characteristics.
Authors: John T Wilson; Carter J Boyd; Jared Halstrom; Aseel Dib; Kimberly Martin; Michael D Johnson Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 1.251
Authors: Zachary R Burns; Carter J Boyd; Zachary W Sollie; Hua A Fang; Kimberly D Martin; Robert J Dabal Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Carter J Boyd; Jason J Patel; Edgar Soto; Srikanth Kurapati; Kimberly D Martin; Timothy W King Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 2.192