| Literature DB >> 32278344 |
Martin Bäumlein1, Antonio Klasan1, Christine Klötzer1, Benjamin Bockmann2, Daphne Eschbach1, Matthias Knobe3, Benjamin Bücking1, Steffen Ruchholtz1, Christopher Bliemel4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Implant anchorage in highly osteoporotic bone is challenging, since it often leads to osteosynthesis failure in geriatric patients with supracondylar femoral fractures. Cementation of screws is presumed to prevent such osteosynthesis failure. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a newly designed, cementable fenestrated condylar screw for plate fixation in a biomechanical setting.Entities:
Keywords: Biomechanical analysis; Cement augmentation; Distal femoral fracture; Fenestrated screws; Osteoporosis; Polyaxial angular stable plate osteosynthesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32278344 PMCID: PMC7149902 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03215-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Clinical case of a 93-year-old woman with highly osteoporotic bone structure and the presence of a supracondylar distal femoral fracture (a). Fracture fixation was conducted with a plate osteosynthesis and cement augmentation of the condylar screws. As shown (red arrows), an uncontrolled cement outflow towards proximal occurred (b)
Fig. 2Illustration of the new, partially threaded, fenestrated, cancellous, condylar screw (diameter 5 mm) suitable for the NCB®-DF system. The screw provides two longitudinal furrows and ten perforation holes, for an optimal cement extrusion along the shaft of the screw
Fig. 3Cement injection gun (large picture detail) with cement applicator and iN3 calcium phosphate bone cement (small picture detail)
Fig. 4Typical postoperative X-ray pictures showing a pair of samples with cement augmented, fenestrated condylar screws in the right femur (a) and with non-augmented condylar screws in the left femur (b)
Fig. 5Test setup demonstrating force application with a metal plate, movable in two directions. The femoral shaft is statically fixed in an anatomical 5–7° valgus position
Fig. 6Photographs showing the different types of construct failures. Cutting out of the screws (a) was most common in both groups, followed by deformation of the condylar region (b). This deformation of the condylar region can be seen by comparing the position of the distal end of the plate in relation to the joint line before loading ((b) small picture) and at the end of the testing ((b) big picture). Condylar fracture (c) was only seen once in the group with cement augmented condylar screws
Fig. 7Failure loads based on the cyclic loading tests, comparing plate osteosynthesis with and without augmentation of the condylar screws
Fig. 8Plastic deformation of osteosynthesis with augmented condylar screws and non-augmented condylar screws at a load of 1000 N