Literature DB >> 16821654

Cement augmentation in fracture treatment.

S Larsson1.   

Abstract

Surgical treatment of fractures close to joints, especially in osteoporotic patients, is often associated with problems to obtain adequate strength of the bone-implant construct as well as sufficient purchase for screws in the weak bone. One way to address this increasing problem is through the development of new metal implants specifically designed for fixation of fractures in osteopenic bone. An alternative strategy is to develop methods for augmentation of the weak bone that surrounds the metal implant. In most instances augmentation is achieved by using injectable cement to reinforce the bone. Conventional PMMA provides good strength but due to several drawbacks it has never gained general acceptance for fracture augmentation. More recently several injectable cements based on calcium-phosphate, calcium-sulphate or bioglass has been developed for augmentation of fractures in the extremities as well as for vertebral compressive fractures in the spine. On the basis of biomechanical studies and the clinical experience so far, cement augmentation will enable faster rehabilitation, as the strength of the cement makes it possible to allow full weight-bearing earlier than conventional metal implants alone. More clinical studies are needed in order to refine the surgical technique, develop cement types aimed for fracture treatment and define the most appropriate indications and limitations of augmentation for fracture repair. The purpose of this article is to review the possible use of augmentation as a technique in the treatment of fractures in the extremities as well as in the spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16821654     DOI: 10.1177/145749690609500206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Surg        ISSN: 1457-4969            Impact factor:   2.360


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of a fiber reinforced drillable bone cement for screw augmentation in a sheep model--mechanical testing.

Authors:  Benjamin J Ahern; Robert D Harten; Elliott A Gruskin; Thomas P Schaer
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Augmentation of implant fixation in osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Clifford B Jones
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Granuloma debridement and the use of an injectable calcium phosphate bone cement in the treatment of osteolysis in an uncemented total knee replacement.

Authors:  Henry D Atkinson; Vijai S Ranawat; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Long- Stem Total Knee Arthroplasty for Proximal Tibial Stress Fractures in the Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Mahmoud Jabalameli; Hossein A Hadi; Abolfazl Bagherifard; Mohammad Rahbar; Mohammadreza Minator Sajjadi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-09

Review 5.  Nanotechnology for treating osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Chunxia Gao; Donglei Wei; Huilin Yang; Tao Chen; Lei Yang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-08-13

6.  The Photodynamic Bone Stabilization System: a minimally invasive, percutaneous intramedullary polymeric osteosynthesis for simple and complex long bone fractures.

Authors:  Paul Vegt; Jeffrey M Muir; Jon E Block
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-12-12

7.  Cement augmentation of an angular stable plate osteosynthesis for supracondylar femoral fractures - biomechanical investigation of a new fixation device.

Authors:  Martin Bäumlein; Antonio Klasan; Christine Klötzer; Benjamin Bockmann; Daphne Eschbach; Matthias Knobe; Benjamin Bücking; Steffen Ruchholtz; Christopher Bliemel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review.

Authors:  Wenhao Wang; Kelvin W K Yeung
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-06-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.